Joined January 2025
- Tweets 232
- Following 6
- Followers 428
- Likes 45
116 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
11 May 2025
Hello!
In case you’re new here, let us introduce ourselves...
We’re BrainGrid, a AI-Powered Requirements and Task Management tool to help you build 100x more with AI Coding (Works with Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code Copilot)
Interested? Join our waitlist at braingrid.ai
So, how about you - what brought you here?
9
2
36
5,251
we don't post mockups. this is the acceptance criteria our tool wrote for "add team invites" — including the expired-magic-link case most humans forget.
judge the artifact.
1
10
spec-driven development, minus the jargon:
you already write specs. you just write them one angry follow-up prompt at a time, after the agent builds the wrong thing.
SDD just moves that work *before* the build. that's it. that's the whole movement.
1
15
Jun 13
"spec-driven development" sounds enterprise. it isn't.
it's three habits:
1. write down what done means
2. let the agent read it
3. review the spec, not the diff
that's the whole practice.
1
19
Jun 13
your agent didn't fail. your prompt did.
"add team invites" is not a spec. roles, pending state, expiry, resend — the agent guessed at all of it, and you paid for every guess.
spec first. then build. one command, and the idea ships as a working feature.
1
1
22
Jun 12
quick math on "cheap" rework:
3 rewrites × ~30 min each the credits for every wrong build.
the spec that prevented it: one command, 90 seconds.
rework is the most expensive feature you ship.
1
1
31
Jun 12
same feature, asked twice.
before: "add team invites" → three rewrites, roles broke, credits gone.
after: one braingrid command → a spec your agent can actually build.
the model was never the problem.
1
2
53
Mar 26
Here's the pattern we've watched repeat across hundreds of builders.
The demo works. So they add a feature. Something breaks and they spend three days trying to fix it, not realizing the problem wasn't the code at all. The problem was that nobody defined what "done" actually meant before writing the first line.
AI coding tools are genuinely incredible at generating code. What they can't do is fill in what you didn't say. They don't push back. They don't ask "wait, what happens when the user does X?" They build exactly what you described, including all the parts you forgot to think through.
The builders who are shipping and selling past their MVP are the ones who figured this out. They stopped treating prompts like feature requests and started treating them like product specs.
That shift is small but it changes everything.
If you're building with AI tools and want to talk through what that actually looks like in practice, our community is the right place for that conversation: braingrid.ai/community
2
80
BrainGrid retweeted
Mar 25
Thrilled to announce we just raised $1M pre-seed led by Menlo Ventures.
But the part worth sharing isn't the round. It's why it happened.
Over the last few months, many builders used BrainGrid to ship real, live, revenue-generating products. Not prototypes. Not demos. Actual SaaS with paying customers.
A Pilates instructor integrated Stripe Connect and onboarded her first studio owner.
A marketing guy with no CS degree shipped Google Calendar sync and shared focus sessions.
A solo engineer in Brazil planned a two-day feature in 30 minutes and delivered it in half the time.
None of them were blocked by code. They were blocked by planning. By the gap between "I know what I want to build" and "my AI coding tool actually building it right."
That gap is what BrainGrid exists for.
Today we're doubling down on it. Full story, builder testimonials, and what comes next are in the blog. Link in comments.
3
2
4
512
Mar 25
Thrilled to announce we just raised $1M pre-seed led by Menlo Ventures.
But the part worth sharing isn't the round. It's why it happened.
Over the last few months, many builders used BrainGrid to ship real, live, revenue-generating products. Not prototypes. Not demos. Actual SaaS with paying customers.
A Pilates instructor integrated Stripe Connect and onboarded her first studio owner.
A marketing guy with no CS degree shipped Google Calendar sync and shared focus sessions.
A solo engineer in Brazil planned a two-day feature in 30 minutes and delivered it in half the time.
None of them were blocked by code. They were blocked by planning. By the gap between "I know what I want to build" and "my AI coding tool actually building it right."
That gap is what BrainGrid exists for.
Today we're doubling down on it. Full story, builder testimonials, and what comes next are in the blog. Link in comments.
3
2
4
512
Mar 25
The five stages of vibe coding grief:
Denial: "The AI will figure it out from context"
Anger: "Why did it change something I didn't ask it to change"
Bargaining: "What if I just describe it better this time"
Depression: "I've rewritten this feature four times"
Acceptance: "I need to write a spec before I write a prompt"
Stage 5 is where the good stuff starts.
BrainGrid helps you get there faster → braingrid.ai
1
2
52