Joined May 2024
3 Photos and videos
appreciate @wwwwednesday for bringing @zodiaceco to life top-notch team
Zodiac Visual identity โ†’ Motion โ†’ UI
3
9
521
dream space
In 15mn, 2pm GMT. Coordinating in the Dark: DarkFi Dark Forest OS โ€ข Amir Taaki (@lunardragon420) , @DarkFiSquad โ€ข Yancey Strickler (@ystrickler), DFOS/ @metalabel_ โ€ข Auryn Macmillan (@auryn_macmillan), Interfold x.com/i/spaces/1mxPaaDQPlVKNโ€ฆ
3
45
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Ethereum should not require users to expose their intent before execution. The Interfold is joining the Encrypt the Mempool Coalition to support private, credibly neutral transaction infrastructure.
4
7
27
879
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
The X Space just got daker: Amir (@lunardragon420) from @DarkFiSquad is joining the conversation. We'll be talking dark forests, dark finance, and privacy as the basis for collective agency, not just protection. Tomorrow, 2PM GMT.
Tomorrow, join us for a conversation on the rise of the "dark forest" internet - and what becomes possible when privacy is treated not as a defensive mechanism, but as a foundation for collective agency. Featuring: โ€ข Yancey Strickler (@ystrickler), Dark Forest OS โ€ข Auryn Macmillan (@auryn_macmillan), the Interfold ๐Ÿ“… Thursday, June 11 ๐Ÿ•‘ 2:00 PM GMT Save the date! ๐ŸŒ๐ŸŒณ๐ŸŒ x.com/i/spaces/1mxPaaDQPlVKN
2
14
867
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
tl;dr
3
1
16
590
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted

5
25
1,716
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Receipts are for sandwiches, not votes.
4
3
19
552
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Confidential coordination needs security at every layer: private inputs, verified computation, and threshold decryption. Proud for Interfold to be selected for Cohort I of the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program as we prepare Network Alpha.
Jun 4
1/ World, meet Cohort I of the Ethereum Security Subsidy Program. Out of 100 applicants, here are the 30 projects selected for our first of many cohorts. Proudly securing @ethereum mainnet together with @ethereumfndn, @nethermind and @chainlinklabs.
1
2
17
487
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Ciphernodes are the operators that make encrypted execution possible in the Interfold. They help generate public keys for encrypted inputs and contribute threshold shares when approved outputs are ready to be decrypted. Read the primer: blog.theinterfold.com/what-aโ€ฆ
2
5
18
523
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
1
4
18
471
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
New Interfold website. If you've been trying to understand confidential coordination, multiplayer privacy, ciphernodes, or what we're actually building, this is a good place to start. theinterfold.com/?v=1
2
5
27
591
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
MACI made one thing clear: private inputs and shared outcomes shouldn't depend on one operator. Voting was the starting point. The Interfold generalizes that pattern into a network for confidential coordination.
More people should know about the Interfold. It's basically what I've been yelling at people to build with the MACI ideas ( ethresear.ch/t/minimal-anti-โ€ฆ ) for almost a decade, and now it exists, in a generalized form. The idea is: a privacy protocol optimized for things like voting (and other use cases eg. secret-ballot auctions). The mechanism generates a threshold encryption key, and people send in their votes onchain, using a ZKP to prove eligibility. An arbitrary computation on the votes gets run inside FHE, and then threshold-decrypted. From what I can tell (the docs are good docs.theinterfold.com/CRISP/โ€ฆ ), it gets pretty optimal security guarantees: * Voter anonymity can be made unconditional if eligibility is proven with ZK-SNARKs * Censorship resistance is guaranteed by ethereum (votes can be posted directly onchain, and there's a proof that all posted votes are taking into account) * The correctness of the outputted result can be ensured via ZK over FHE * Liveness and coercion resistance depend on M-of-N honesty; unavoidable given present-day technology The main limitation is that today "ZK over FHE" is only properly available for additive vote tallying, as it's too expensive for computations that involve multiplication or other more complicated manipulation at the moment. There's work in progress on slashing-based / optimistic computation for such situations. (And of course ideally in the long term we'd figure out obfuscation so you can get rid of the M-of-N committees๐Ÿ˜ƒ)
2
4
28
1,726
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Meet Alessandro (@ctrlc03), Senior Engineer at The Interfold. With experience spanning cybersecurity, cryptography, contributions to MACI, p0tion, and @PrivacyEthereum infrastructure, he's helping build the foundations for multiparty privacy at scale. We're grateful to have him on our team! blog.theinterfold.com/alessaโ€ฆ
7
3
30
1,743
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
hey, today gave a lecture on ZK and posted some notes about what I said and the exercises! Very beginner friendly and helps you get the mental model, cheers! 0xjei.dev/writings/zk-lecturโ€ฆ
5
33
984
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
More people should know about the Interfold. It's basically what I've been yelling at people to build with the MACI ideas ( ethresear.ch/t/minimal-anti-โ€ฆ ) for almost a decade, and now it exists, in a generalized form. The idea is: a privacy protocol optimized for things like voting (and other use cases eg. secret-ballot auctions). The mechanism generates a threshold encryption key, and people send in their votes onchain, using a ZKP to prove eligibility. An arbitrary computation on the votes gets run inside FHE, and then threshold-decrypted. From what I can tell (the docs are good docs.theinterfold.com/CRISP/โ€ฆ ), it gets pretty optimal security guarantees: * Voter anonymity can be made unconditional if eligibility is proven with ZK-SNARKs * Censorship resistance is guaranteed by ethereum (votes can be posted directly onchain, and there's a proof that all posted votes are taking into account) * The correctness of the outputted result can be ensured via ZK over FHE * Liveness and coercion resistance depend on M-of-N honesty; unavoidable given present-day technology The main limitation is that today "ZK over FHE" is only properly available for additive vote tallying, as it's too expensive for computations that involve multiplication or other more complicated manipulation at the moment. There's work in progress on slashing-based / optimistic computation for such situations. (And of course ideally in the long term we'd figure out obfuscation so you can get rid of the M-of-N committees๐Ÿ˜ƒ)
The Interfold Launch Primer starts today. Over the next several weeks, we'll explain the system, the network, ciphernodes, and the path to participation. First: How Interfold works, from private inputs to collective outcomes.
243
151
999
196,687
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
principled people like @auryn_macmillan delivering confidential compute via @theInterfold also avail as a talk at Cypherpunk Congress: youtube.com/watch?v=gvVhTEmNโ€ฆ
More people should know about the Interfold. It's basically what I've been yelling at people to build with the MACI ideas ( ethresear.ch/t/minimal-anti-โ€ฆ ) for almost a decade, and now it exists, in a generalized form. The idea is: a privacy protocol optimized for things like voting (and other use cases eg. secret-ballot auctions). The mechanism generates a threshold encryption key, and people send in their votes onchain, using a ZKP to prove eligibility. An arbitrary computation on the votes gets run inside FHE, and then threshold-decrypted. From what I can tell (the docs are good docs.theinterfold.com/CRISP/โ€ฆ ), it gets pretty optimal security guarantees: * Voter anonymity can be made unconditional if eligibility is proven with ZK-SNARKs * Censorship resistance is guaranteed by ethereum (votes can be posted directly onchain, and there's a proof that all posted votes are taking into account) * The correctness of the outputted result can be ensured via ZK over FHE * Liveness and coercion resistance depend on M-of-N honesty; unavoidable given present-day technology The main limitation is that today "ZK over FHE" is only properly available for additive vote tallying, as it's too expensive for computations that involve multiplication or other more complicated manipulation at the moment. There's work in progress on slashing-based / optimistic computation for such situations. (And of course ideally in the long term we'd figure out obfuscation so you can get rid of the M-of-N committees๐Ÿ˜ƒ)
2
3
24
2,107
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Privacy gets more interesting when it has to produce a shared outcome. A winner. A tally. An evaluation. The hard part isn't hiding information. It's producing a verifiable result without giving one party control over the process. New Launch Primer โ†“
6
7
32
1,173
useful report from Quantus on quantum risk, cryptographic migration, and the coordination challenges facing crypto infrastructure. see the report for @auryn_macmillan's take
The crypto industry is on a collision course with quantum computing. We just published a report on where it stands, what it does to crypto, and what the industry is and isn't doing. Introducing ๐Ÿ‘‡ "The State of Quantum: What Crypto Can't Afford to Ignore" A thank you to our co-collaborators, @NEARProtocol @near_intents @quipnetwork @cadillion @midnightfdn @SebastienGllmt @KeystoneWallet @gnosisguild @auryn_macmillan @terminal3io @SwaynesWord @tx_track Link here ๐Ÿ‘‡ report.quantus.com/
1
8
388
facts
More people should know about the Interfold. It's basically what I've been yelling at people to build with the MACI ideas ( ethresear.ch/t/minimal-anti-โ€ฆ ) for almost a decade, and now it exists, in a generalized form. The idea is: a privacy protocol optimized for things like voting (and other use cases eg. secret-ballot auctions). The mechanism generates a threshold encryption key, and people send in their votes onchain, using a ZKP to prove eligibility. An arbitrary computation on the votes gets run inside FHE, and then threshold-decrypted. From what I can tell (the docs are good docs.theinterfold.com/CRISP/โ€ฆ ), it gets pretty optimal security guarantees: * Voter anonymity can be made unconditional if eligibility is proven with ZK-SNARKs * Censorship resistance is guaranteed by ethereum (votes can be posted directly onchain, and there's a proof that all posted votes are taking into account) * The correctness of the outputted result can be ensured via ZK over FHE * Liveness and coercion resistance depend on M-of-N honesty; unavoidable given present-day technology The main limitation is that today "ZK over FHE" is only properly available for additive vote tallying, as it's too expensive for computations that involve multiplication or other more complicated manipulation at the moment. There's work in progress on slashing-based / optimistic computation for such situations. (And of course ideally in the long term we'd figure out obfuscation so you can get rid of the M-of-N committees๐Ÿ˜ƒ)
1
5
148
gnosis guild ๐’†™ retweeted
Some vault actions are routine. Others change the system's risk surface. They should not sit behind the same permissions. Policy Pattern 04: Curator Ops, Separated by Authority
1
1
6
474