Joined April 2025
54 Photos and videos
23h
History rhymes. Governments once tried to treat cryptography as a munition. The math didn't care. Open-source won. The same playbook is now being applied to AI. It will fail for the same reasons. Not your AI, not your intelligence. Open-source, local-first, intelligence you own. That's the only path forward. That's why we created QVAC. Qvac.tether.io
18
45
310
2,929,997
QVAC retweeted
"Not your AI not your Intelligence" just became very clear @qvac Cypherpunk v2.0 will be about Open-Source AI.
36
28
343
36,022
QVAC retweeted
And they already integrated @qvac for local AI โค๏ธโค๏ธ๐Ÿค–๐Ÿค–
Just finished my field trip at the @G_Bionics robotics R&D in Genoa ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น At the core of Generative Bionics'a first robot, the GENE.01, there is an insane amount of mind-blowing engineering. I'm truly astonished by the achievements of Daniele's team. A beautiful Italian story.
8
13
142
17,432
QVAC retweeted
Just finished my field trip at the @G_Bionics robotics R&D in Genoa ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น At the core of Generative Bionics'a first robot, the GENE.01, there is an insane amount of mind-blowing engineering. I'm truly astonished by the achievements of Daniele's team. A beautiful Italian story.
16
21
266
30,847
Jun 12
Ok, we got our first prediction wrong. Fair enough. So we're running it back: 4 predictions today, each one made by an AI running 100% on your own device with QVAC. It pulls real team stats, runs 10,000 simulations, shows its reasoning, then commits to a scoreline. Today's 4: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA v Paraguay ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡พ ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil v Morocco ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Germany v Curaรงao ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands v Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต The AI's call for each game is in the replies. How many do you think it gets right? Drop your predictions below ๐Ÿ‘‡ qvac.tether.io/
9
44
587
17,337,338
Jun 12
Match 4 Most likely outcome: ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 1 - 0 Japan ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Based on the 10,000 simulations: ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands wins 45% of the time ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan wins 29% of the time 26 % chance for a draw
1
1
1,652
Jun 12
Want to play around with the predictor yourself? Try it out here: github.com/tetherto/qvac-fooโ€ฆ Want to build Local AI application? Download the QVAC SDK and gain your sovereignty over AI qvac.tether.io/
1
1,301
Jun 11

Jun 11
Replying to @qvac
In our first AI Prediction, see what happens when Mexico vs South Africa is played out 10,000 times by a model running 100% on one laptop. No cloud. QVAC Prediction for this game: Mexico ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ 1 - 1 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆSouth Africa ๐ŸŸฅ Red card for Mexico ๐ŸŸจ Yellow Card for South Africa Will this be accurate? Weโ€™ll know soon enough!
2
1
18
2,639
QVAC retweeted
QVAC Football Predictor 2026 is here โšฝ๏ธ
Jun 11
The tournament kicks off today, so we let a local AI call the opening game. This is QVAC Football Predictor 2026: every match simulated, the local AI writes the verdict.
11
6
57
15,459
Jun 11
How it works: A Monte Carlo model plays the match 10,000 times for the odds,using real football data. Then a local Qwen3, on-device through the QVAC SDK, reads those numbers and writes the call. It can run single matches or the whole 48-team tournament too, 5,000 times over.
1
1
7
1,709
Jun 11
We built it in 36 hours, and it is fully open source under Apache 2.0. Want to give it a try? Clone it, run it on your own machine, fork it, ship your own features. github.com/tetherto/qvac-fooโ€ฆ
2
8
1,357
Jun 11
QVAC Football Predictor is not a new QVAC product. It is an illustrative project, built to showcase what a local AI agent can do with the QVAC SDK: real data, on-device inference, and no cloud, all in one small app. This GitHub repo is an illustrative example only and provided "as is." You are responsible for what you build, including ensuring it complies with applicable laws and is appropriately safeguarded.
1
7
1,161
Jun 11
The tournament kicks off today, so we let a local AI call the opening game. This is QVAC Football Predictor 2026: every match simulated, the local AI writes the verdict.
28
48
1,038
8,210,027
Jun 11
In our first AI Prediction, see what happens when Mexico vs South Africa is played out 10,000 times by a model running 100% on one laptop. No cloud. QVAC Prediction for this game: Mexico ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ 1 - 1 ๐Ÿ‡ฟ๐Ÿ‡ฆSouth Africa ๐ŸŸฅ Red card for Mexico ๐ŸŸจ Yellow Card for South Africa Will this be accurate? Weโ€™ll know soon enough!
1
10
9,363
Jun 11
An image generator does not "draw." It starts from pure static, random noise with no picture in it, then removes that noise a little at a time until an image appears. That step by step cleanup is a diffusion model. Why start from noise? Because painting a full image in one shot is too hard, even for a big model. Removing a little noise is easy. Diffusion splits one impossible task into 20 to 50 easy ones, each step cleaning up the one before.
2
4
53
196,906
Jun 11
The starting static is a random "seed." Same prompt and same seed give the exact same image every time. Change the seed and you get a fresh take on the same idea. How does it learn the cleanup? Take millions of real images and add noise until each is static. Train the model to look at a noisy image and predict the noise that was added. Subtract that guess, and the picture gets one step clearer. Your prompt is a steering wheel, not a search box. At each step the model imagines the scene with your words and without them, then leans toward the version that matches. That lean is the "guidance" dial. Push it too high and images come out fried. It can run on a laptop for one reason: it never cleans up millions of pixels. It denoises a small compressed "sketch" of the image, then expands that to full resolution at the end. The whole model is a few GB, and your prompt and picture never leave your device.
1
3
739