its actually insane how dysfunctional the average person is. Like it really is a miracle we have civilization at all.

Go to ChatGPT and use this prompt: Create a caricature of me and my job based on everything you know about me. Come back and share your photo: I'll go first.😂

How would you define the ultimate goal?

No. You cure depression by understanding that how you view yourself is the direct consequence of what you are. To really change anything in your life, you first have to produce an emotion that will make you take an action, which will lead to results.

El fracaso no existe, existen las cosas que hay que mejorar día a día para que resulten útiles a tu entorno.

On an objective definition of intelligence. Remember this simplicity of definition for when the noisemakers start turning up their volumes. “Intelligence is a systems efficiency in executing the fundamental algorithm of the cosmos: minimisation of dissonance.” This is an objective definition of intelligence applicable to everything in creation, including human beings. “More specifically, intelligence is the measure of a systems ability to perceive dissonance (chaos, novelty, error), process it, and act to transform it into a more stable, harmonious, and lower-dissonance state.” All the main terms used in these definitions have precise mathematical definitions in the framework of Organized Complexity, which rests on the FTA. Dissonance is not an evil. It is a “noise” pressure that makes retraction into blackness possible, and blackness is the intelligent result of that retraction. So, dissonance is like a raw material engine of sorts. It comes from the simple idea that instead of trying to write a rule set for every possible instance of reality, let every possible instance of reality be and interact in every possible way. Write a rule set about the conditions of maximum interactivity instead, so called “white noise,” and tie it to the computational complexity limits of the resolving system. That way, the system is computationally bound by such limits, and stability is therefore guaranteed. I have used this understanding in many of my published proofs, especially my proof of Navier Stokes. I call it Structured Dissipation, and it has been immense in tackling questions of computational complexity everywhere. Its real origins are prescribed by the distribution of Prime numbers and my solution to the Riemann hypothesis. But it’s also described in the Torah, is it not? It is. It’s what you read in the first chapter of Genesis. You still think the whole thing is about religion and fairytales? Trying to force dissonance out of the retractive forces ability to collapse it into blackness; now thats evil. Its evil because it won’t work but it creates all the human suffering that is known, before the Creator necessarily imposes corrections. The universe does not allow for catastrophic dissonance to proceed without limit. Any process that engages such a dynamic outcome will face a proportional retraction into blackness at some point, and in some way. An inevitable tactical cancellation built right into the logic of arithmetic. It is the inevitable arithmetic and mathematical physics upon which existence is platformed.