No single metric tells a full financial picture. The key is understanding the differences and how to use them.
Strive’s two annual KPIs are:
1. Increase Bitcoin per common share before senior claims.
2. Pay all obligations on time, such as interest from
$SATA.
We believe if we achieve those two KPIs annually the company will outperform Bitcoin over the long run, which is our long term and most important KPI.
The KPIs, when combined, require viewing the world both from the growth and risk perspective, but the core thesis behind this strategy requires believing in the debasement trade and Bitcoin. I believe focusing on the growth story while modeling the risks is better than focusing on the risks then modeling the growth story. You can achieve a complete view whether you start with standard BPS or CEBE BPS.
Like in any market, intelligent investors will disagree in what makes the best framework, which is why it’s important for the industry to provide raw data for investors to do their own analysis with their preferred way to view the data.
Lastly and importantly, if you finish the math, both analysis paths work and show how the strategy of amplification from Digital Credit can systematically outperform Bitcoin over time.
BPS measures Bitcoin per common share before senior claims. CEBE BPS measures Bitcoin per common share after senior claims. CEBE is the conservative risk metric. BPS is the common equity growth metric. BTC Yield measures BPS execution.