This is the problem with grouping things together like DEI, Covid & Biden... I didn't read a single word after that.
It's lumping things together that may look similar on the surface but that have enough differences to demand a detailed explanation of their intersection's effect on Bitcoin. Next thing, we'll be hearing about how loose British immigration laws are ruining Bitcoin - just because on the surface it looks topically similar. It makes an honest reader question the argument's logic and throw the rest of the words away. The only people still reading are ones that already agree with the opinion and want something tasty to slurp up to reinforce their beliefs. It's revealing that the argument is entirely based on an assumption of three things looking alike, without actually making any real case that offers real value to anyone. Rational readers don't want to listen to assumptions.
That same lazy logic would stand to suggest that DEI BitDev hires are okay as long as they're done by Covid-shutdown and Biden critics. Neither the original point, nor this inferred point here, make any sense in terms to the potential damage that BitDev DEI hiring may actually result in.
BitDev DEI hiring deserves to be talked about. Lazy thinking like waving a tribal banner and honking on anthemic generalities gets in the way of where there might (seemingly accidentally) be a real point. Rational thinkers have already left the chat.