🚨 FIFA FAILED ALREADY
What has happened at the 2026 World Cup over the last 48 hours:
1️⃣ Swiss footballer Embolo’s visa was suddenly put under review, delaying his arrival to join his national team.
2️⃣ Iraqi striker Aymen Hussein was reportedly held for questioning for nearly 7 hours upon entering the United States.
3️⃣ Iran’s national team spent days struggling through visa procedures at the U.S. Consulate in Türkiye.
The U.S. reportedly only allowed them entry on match days, while 15 delegation members were denied visas completely.
4️⃣ Omar Abdulkadir Artan — CAF’s Best African Referee of 2025 — was denied entry into the United States despite traveling with a diplomatic passport.
FIFA confirmed he will not officiate at the tournament.
5️⃣ South Africa’s national team arrived much later than expected because part of the delegation was not granted visas on time.
6️⃣ Senegal national team staff were allegedly forced to remove their shoes and subjected to extensive searches, sparking accusations of discrimination and racism online.
7️⃣ Uzbekistan’s national team was searched with bomb-sniffing dogs, with footage spreading rapidly across international media.
8️⃣ Some Scottish supporters had their ESTA travel authorizations revoked only days before departure despite reportedly qualifying for visa-free travel.
9️⃣ Thousands of supporters who already bought tickets and accommodation reportedly had visa applications rejected — leaving many with major financial losses.
The tournament hasn’t even fully started yet… and chaos is already dominating headlines worldwide.
RULES ARE RULES.
#fblifestyle #fbtrending #viralposts #relationshiptalk #modernrelationships #psychologyfacts #masculinitycoach #mensmindset #menwithpurpose #alphamindset #highvaluecontent #viraltruths #mindsetshift #dailytruths #masculinityrise #mentaltoughness #selfmasteryjourney #modernmasculinity #lifeadviceformen #thetruthhurts #uncomfortabletruths #darkpsychologyfacts #realtalkdaily #knowledgeispower
Le fameux mythe journalistique ! Rappelons qd même que le décret de dissolution du 3 mars 2021 reprochait officiellement à Génération Identitaire son organisation "sous une forme militaire" (les doudounes bleues devaient faire très peur) et 1 "provocation à la discrimination" 1/
Jain’s are at the apex of discrimination matrix.
They discriminate on the bases of caste religion business food clothing language etc.
Yes the white line is an issue.
मी मराठी आहे एंड मी असल्या गोष्टीचा विरोध करतोय..
Kylie Maree retweeted
Discrimination is not about what someone is. It's about how they are perceived.
A straight man who is flamboyant might be discriminated against because a homophobe THINKS he is gay. It doesn't matter that he isn't gay. He was still discriminated against because of perception.
1
1
1
16
@Devonshires have DEMANDED I do not write about or discuss any matters related to the findings of the gross misconduct, fraud, attempted murder, perverting justice, contempt of court, defamation, wasting police time, discrimination and ‘general disregard for (my) Human Rights
1
Charles thinks getting a malfeasant underling to email an undated word salad letter, which provided zero explanation for the abuse, lies, harassment, discrimination, fraud, gross misconduct and does not provide his contact details, despite stating ‘contact me directly’.
1
Gilly retweeted
Trans women are women under CEDAW!
The Australian Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (SDA) was enacted to give effect to Australia’s international obligations under the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
In the trial, the defence (Grover) argued that CEDAW only recognised biological sex and that the SDA's protection of "gender identity" was inconsistent with the treaty's definition of "women."
The Federal Court found that Australia's interpretation of CEDAW does not prevent it from broadening domestic protections to cover gender identity, and that both the SDA and Australia's CEDAW obligations protect transgender women from discrimination based on their gender identity.
The factor that persuaded the Federal Court was that the United Nations Human Rights Committee which is the one that’s empowered to hear complaints about violence under the treaty had accepted that gender identity is an other status for the purpose of article 26, the list of examples when this occurred is set out in the judgment and those examples range from 2012 to 2023 the Federal Court held that article 26 created an obligation for parties to the convention to prohibit discrimination on a number of grounds which quote may readily extend to gender identity unquote. This then provided the treaty obligation which triggers the application of the external affairs power to support the relevant provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act that addresses gender identity.
So that’s how the train of reasoning worked out.
google.com/url?sa=i&source=w…
Jun 13
It is worth remembering that time spent arguing about who is a women and demonising trans women is time taken away from solving real problems like gender-based violence, pay inequity, workplace gender equality and access to reproductive healthcare.
Australia should be proud of the fact that, unlike the UK, we have contemporary anti-discrimination laws that protect all women, and courts that are willing to interpret and apply the laws in ways that are consistent with human rights norms and modern science.
Following the Giggle for Girls v Tickle decision, we can be confident that Australia is not going to allow the importation of the kind of anti-trans rhetoric we are seeing in the United States and UK. We will continue to be a country where all women enjoy equality before the law.”
abc.net.au/religion/giggle-f…
2
6
294
Canada ’ਚ Sikh Community ਦਾ ਭਵਿੱਖ ਕੀ ਹੈ? ਨਸਲੀ ਹਿੰਸਾ ਤੇ ਭੇਦਭਾਵ ਦੇ ਵਧਦੇ ਮਾਮਲੇ! | Racism | Hate Crimes
youtube.com/watch?v=gIrUtf2V… youtube.com/watch?v=gIrUtf2V…
What is the future of Sikhs in Canada? Are incidents of racism, discrimination, hate crimes, and targeted violence against the Sikh
3
𝓟𝓪𝓽𝓽𝔂 retweeted
They don’t want us discussing caste discrimination because they’re actively establishing a Hindu caste system in our nation. That’s why Hindutva is trying to pass laws accusing us of “Hinduphobia” for discussing it.
26
97
339
2,600
Facts he should file a discrimination lawsuit force them to show how many times that lady called cops on black ppl for same thing
2
sexism isn't hatred, that's misogyny. sexism refers to the prejudice and/or discrimination of a specific sex. please do your research. you can give your opinion and it still be sexist. hope that makes sense.
1
6
bamboo retweeted
"A viral video emerging from Kanpur has sparked a debate over social discrimination and law and order. It is being claimed that some people assaulted and attacked Dalit youths with sticks when they arrived to bathe at the Ganga Ghat. The video of the incident is rapidly going viral on social media. Demands for an investigation into the matter are rising, and people are calling for action against the culprits. The administration is currently investigating the entire matter. #Kanpur #India
2
2
60
Smooth brain low IQ of 85 can't understand this is why there were no blacks on the jury. Because you don't look at law you look at skin color that is called a tribble mindset and that's why he didn't have any black people on the jury they said they wouldn't be able to convict someone of the same skin color
Here's the straight explanation for why there were no Black jurors in the Karmelo Anthony trial:
What Actually Happened During Jury Selection
Jury pool: Started with ~589–600 prospective jurors summoned in Collin County, Texas (Black population ~12%).
Final panel: 12 jurors 6 alternates. Zero identified as Black.
Prosecution strikes: Prosecutors used peremptory challenges to strike the last three qualified Black prospective jurors.
Reason given: They were all educators (teachers/school-related). The case involved a school track meet with high school kids. Prosecutors said they didn't want educators on the jury for a case about teens at a school event — claimed it was race-neutral.
Defense response: Raised a Batson challenge (illegal racial discrimination in jury strikes). Judge John Roach Jr. rejected it and sided with the prosecution.
Specific admissions: At least one Black prospective juror said they'd have a "hard time putting a brother in jail." Others gave answers suggesting bias (e.g., "silence is deafening").
The defense participated in the entire process but couldn't (or didn't) keep any Black jurors on the panel. The jury included other minorities (Asian, Hispanic, etc.), but no Black jurors.
Why Geragos (and others) are pushing "unfair trial"
Mark Geragos (high-profile defense attorney) called it over after jury selection because he knows the stats: in high-profile interracial cases with a Black defendant, some Black jurors increase the chance of deadlock or acquittal on self-defense claims — especially when race gets injected. It's not about "no Black jurors = automatic racism." It's about the reality that jury composition affects outcomes when identity politics enter the room.
Smooth brain version:
Prosecutors legally struck the remaining Black candidates for stated non-racial reasons (educator occupation some admitted bias).
The judge approved it.
This is standard adversarial jury selection. Both sides strike people they think will hurt their case.
Black jurors aren't constitutionally guaranteed in every trial (jury of "peers" means from the community, not racially engineered to match the defendant). Random summons strikes got them to zero.
The evidence was overwhelming (Karmelo brought a knife to a tent he wasn't supposed to be in, stabbed Austin in the heart after being told to leave). The jury convicted in hours. No Black juror was needed to see that.
This "no Black jurors = unfair" cope is just post-verdict race-baiting to avoid the facts of the stabbing. Geragos is playing to the crowd.
1
Akshay Kashyap retweeted
The young Sikh student set a wonderful example for everyone.
Racism and discrimination are unacceptable, period. 🛑
2
99
427
13,322
Mecca My NAME is my NAME Bey retweeted
Think Black folks get special treatment? Think again. This video busts that myth, exposing historical discrimination like redlining that shows the opposite is true. #FactsMatter #HistoryLesson
4
3
19
297
Igbo culture of discrimination is not the same in SW Yoruba is a Yoruba anywhere in the SW. we don’t have bitter minds towards one another like you guys. Don’t see the world through your local and subjective views of your culture
1
The underrepresentation of women at the absolute extreme wealth is not evidence of systemic inequity or unfair discrimination against women. It largely reflects well-documented average differences in traits, interests, variance, and life choices that play out in free societies.