By calling for extermination of ukrainians He is not different from N / ben Gvir calling for extermination of palestinians X/x

American_Spirit, thank you for joining the Monday Extermination Squad ✨ The fox-eared beauty is absolutely gorgeous 😻 That gun surrounded by light-blue effects looks really cool 🩵 The dynamic motion with water splashing all around is wonderful 🤗 I can't help but admire that focused and determined expression 💕

Mistakes: Lavra is 1000y old It predates russia It is not catholic but orthodox It's ukrainian orthodox church, next to constantinople patriarcat Russian orthodox church is a subdivision of FSB Cyril is Mikhaïlov from KGB He called for ukrainians extermination in 22 1/x

Gives us a chance to go back to the paper based system and escape the tyranny of the internet that is making billionaires, who then using it against us to imprison us into a digital world and then will us to do what they want through cyber bullying and extermination like in the case of the Palestinians.

The Third Reich DID NOT call for the extermination of all Jews. But the Jews DID call for the extermination of ALL Europeans. Can you SEE THE TRUTH now? Do you UNDERSTAND what really happened? The Painter was right.

Evidence against Streicher came from his speeches and articles over the years. Prosecutors contended that his articles and speeches were so incendiary that he was an accessory to murder, and therefore as culpable as those who actually ordered the mass extermination of Jews.

Let me make it a little clearer for you. Gaza: The Numbers, the Verdict, and the Authorities A sourced record, current to June 2026. A standard sleight of hand runs through most "balanced" coverage of this question: it answers what a court has finalized when asked what the evidence shows, and it treats anything short of a final binding verdict as "unresolved." That is not neutrality. It is the evidentiary standard of the accused party, dressed up as caution. No international court convicted anyone over Srebrenica, Rwanda, or Darfur until years or decades after the killing, and we did not wait for those verdicts before naming what was happening. The standard below is the one investigating bodies actually use: reasonable grounds to conclude, applied to the documented record. 1. The death toll, low to high Gaza (October 2023 – June 2026) Confirmed, named dead (floor): The Gaza Health Ministry's tally surpassed 73,000 in mid-June 2026, with more than 173,000 wounded. The ministry compiles a named, identified list; its records are widely treated as generally reliable, and an Israeli army official acknowledged in January 2026 that roughly 70,000 had been killed. Independent survey (violent deaths only): The Gaza Mortality Survey, a population-representative household study published in The Lancet Global Health, estimated 75,200 violent deaths to 5 January 2025 — about 35% higher than the Health Ministry's count for the same window. The study's conclusion is important: the official figures are a conservative floor, not an overcount. Capture-recapture estimate: A separate Lancet analysis (Jamaluddine et al.) estimated 64,260 traumatic-injury deaths to June 2024, with a confidence range spanning roughly 55,000 to 88,000. The true total is higher than any of these. All of the above count violent deaths. None fully capture the indirect dead — those lost to famine, disease, dehydration, and the deliberate collapse of the health system — nor the thousands still missing under rubble. UN-backed food-security experts formally declared famine in Gaza City in 2025. Across every method, the demographic composition stays consistent: women, children, and the elderly make up well over half of the dead. Lebanon (October 2023 – November 2024 war, plus 2026 renewal) Israeli strikes killed more than 3,961 people in Lebanon between October 2023 and the November 2024 ceasefire, including 736 women, 248 children, and 222 health and rescue workers (Lebanese Health Ministry; Human Rights Watch). Roughly 1.2 million people were displaced. The September 2024 pager-and-walkie-talkie attack killed dozens and injured more than 2,800 in a single indiscriminate operation that legal analysts flagged as a violation of the prohibition on booby traps. Renewed fighting in 2026 has pushed the toll higher still. On the Israeli side, Hezbollah fire killed roughly 30 civilians plus soldiers over the main war. 2. Is it genocide? Genocide under the 1948 Convention (Article II) requires two things: (a) one or more prohibited acts against a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, and (b) the specific intent (dolus specialis) to destroy that group in whole or in part. The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry, after two years of investigation, concluded on 16 September 2025 that Israel has committed four of the five genocidal acts named in the Convention: killing members of the group causing serious bodily or mental harm deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction imposing measures intended to prevent births It further found that explicit statements by Israeli civilian and military leaders, taken together with the pattern of military conduct, establish the intent element. The Commission is chaired by Navi Pillay — former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, former ICC judge, and former president of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. This is not a fringe panel. What the experts are saying: a warning that began as "grave risk" in October 2023 has, over two years, hardened into a determination of fact. More than 800 scholars of international and genocide law sounded the alarm within a week of 7 October 2023. By 2025 the conclusion was no longer that genocide was a risk but that it was a reality. The dissent — Israel, allied governments shielding themselves from complicity, and a minority of legal scholars — is real but is a minority position. Calling that landscape "divided" misrepresents where the weight sits. 3. The authorities Institutions and bodies that have formally concluded Israel's conduct in Gaza constitutes genocide or genocidal acts: United Nations system UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry (Navi Pillay) — found genocide; report 16 September 2025 UN Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices — found Israel's warfare methods consistent with genocide (November 2024) UN Special Rapporteur on the OPT, Francesca Albanese — "Anatomy of a Genocide" (March 2024) and "Gaza Genocide: A Collective Crime" (October 2025) Multiple UN Special Rapporteurs and independent experts — warned of genocide from October/November 2023 onward The genocide-studies field International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) — the professional association of the discipline; resolution passed by supermajority (2025) that Israel's actions meet the legal definition Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention — active genocide alerts from October 2023 Genocide Watch — classified the situation as genocide International human rights organizations Amnesty International — concluded genocide (December 2024) Human Rights Watch — found extermination and acts of genocide, documenting deliberate deprivation of water (December 2024) Médecins Sans Frontières / Doctors Without Borders — "Life in a Death Trap," found genocide and genocidal acts (December 2024) Israeli human rights organizations B'Tselem — "Our Genocide" (July 2025) Physicians for Human Rights–Israel — concluded genocide (July 2025) Scholars, including Israeli and Holocaust historians Omer Bartov, Amos Goldberg, Raz Segal, Melanie O'Brien and many others University Network for Human Rights — legal analysis concluding violation of the Genocide Convention (June 2024) Courts and legal process (pending, not yet final — but already significant) International Court of Justice (South Africa v. Israel): in January 2024 found it plausible that the rights of Palestinians under the Genocide Convention were at risk and ordered Israel to take all measures to prevent genocidal acts; reinforced with further provisional measures in 2024. Merits judgment pending. ICJ Advisory Opinion (July 2024): Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territory is unlawful and must end. International Criminal Court: arrest warrants issued in November 2024 for the Israeli prime minister and former defence minister for war crimes and crimes against humanity. 4. The intent question, answered directly The single hardest element to prove in any genocide case is intent. It is also the place every evasion hides, because intent feels subjective. It is not. It is inferred from evidence — and here the evidence is unusually explicit, which is precisely why the UN Commission was able to make the finding it did. The record includes statements from the highest levels of the Israeli state made in the opening days and weeks of the campaign: the announcement of a "complete siege" of Gaza with "no electricity, no food, no fuel," paired with the dehumanizing framing of the population; references to Gaza's inhabitants in collective, eliminationist terms; and calls that drew no distinction between combatant and civilian. These are not anonymous social-media posts. They are on-record declarations by ministers and commanders, and South Africa placed them at the center of its ICJ filing. So, to the question as it is actually asked — does the documented record show intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a group? — the bodies that investigated it have answered yes: the UN Commission of Inquiry, the genocide scholars' own professional association, the leading human rights organizations, and Israeli human rights groups. "A court has not finalized its ruling" is a statement about the speed of legal process, not a rebuttal of the evidentiary finding. The two are different things, and conflating them is the move to watch for. 5. The consistency test Apply the "wait for a binding court verdict" standard consistently and it collapses: The treatment of the Uyghurs is widely called genocide — by the United States government and multiple parliaments — with no court ruling. Darfur was named genocide by the US in 2004; no one has been convicted of it. Srebrenica was genocide on the day it happened, not only when a tribunal said so years later. The "wait for the court" bar is applied to Gaza and almost nowhere else. That selectivity is itself the tell. Bottom line The numbers are not seriously in dispute: a confirmed floor above 73,000, independent surveys placing violent deaths higher still, and indirect deaths uncounted on top. The genocide determination is not a fringe claim: it is the conclusion of the UN's own commission, the professional body of genocide scholars, the major human rights organizations, and Israeli human rights groups, grounded in explicit statements of intent and a documented pattern of conduct. What remains "unresolved" is a single court's final timeline — not the weight of the evidence, and not the verdict of the people whose entire profession is to recognize this crime when they see it. You do not need a court to tell you what the doctors who carried the children out already testified to. The record is the record.

It gives them all rights. Burning and beheading infants should lead to extermination.

I totally agree that both atrocities highlight humanity's capacity for horror and of course should be taught more widely... But then equating Leopold directly to Hitler's regime overlooks key differences The Nazis industrialized genocide with the Holocaust (6 million Jews murdered systematically for their identity) plus millions more targeted victims, all amid a world war they launched that killed 70 million total. Hitler's crimes were deliberate, documented extermination on a continental scale in the heart of Europe.

Describing Irish antisemitism as merely “low level by European standards” sets an extraordinarily low bar — the comparison class includes countries that ran death camps, conducted pogroms, and collaborated enthusiastically with the Holocaust. The “safe home” framing conflates physical safety with genuine welcome. Jewish citizens were not murdered in the streets. But theJewish population of Ireland never grew in the 20th century despite enormous waves of Jewish emigration to other English-speaking countries — suggesting Ireland was not perceived as welcoming by Jews seeking refuge. Contemporary Irish public discourse on Israel-Palestine features Mainstream politicians and commentators routinely using language about Israel — “genocide,” “Nazi,” “settler colonial extermination” — that they apply to no other conflict on earth with equivalent casualness. Ireland’s relationship with antisemitism has a specific texture: it is Catholic-nationalist in origin, not racial-biological in the Nazi sense. This has made it harder to see clearly — it presents as theological suspicion, economic conspiracy rhetoric, and political indifference to Jewish suffering rather than as race hatred.

Yeah, the Iranians capitulated when it came to the continued Palestinian extermination. Now, there is not one country left for any power projection. Regardless, the genocidal Israeli regime has not honored any international or humanitarian laws for decades with impunity.