Appreciate it sleepy! I just chopped a couple inches off the stock so you can get a better eyebox on the scope. Thing tears up empty beer cans.

I feel like anything past 1-8 is sacrificing too much eyebox.

I bought it - it’s really good with actually usable eyebox at 10x - unlike practically all other 1-10s

I’m an Aimpoint or nothing kind of guy. I like that the COA has a smaller footprint but the same eyebox as the ACRO P2. The tactical toaster oven is the best!

Roadmap: launch on Panfan → X/TG push → daily visuals & raids → DEX visibility → bigger listings → more weird updates from the box. $EBOX #EYEBOX #mimicoin

Half box, half witness. EYEBOX doesn’t talk much — it just stares through the noise while the chart decides what kind of disaster it wants to become. $EBOX #EYEBOX #mimicoin

EYEBOX is waking up. One eye in the box, too much signal in the feed. Something weird is being printed. $EBOX e-box.icu t.me/eyeboxicu #EYEBOX #EBOX #mimicoin

📢 New patent grant: "Ultrasonic hologram generation" #US18141127B1 by #MetaPlatforms. This #PatentGrant covers a head-mounted display (HMD) with an ultrasound array. It emits signals to arrange micro-particles into a hologram, visible when illuminated. Viewable from the eyebox region of the HMD. #AugmentedReality #Holography $META

How is the eyebox at 1 and 6 compared to say the razor gen 2 or nx8 1-8? On the fence about picking one up.

I tried the magnifier and eotech. Its heavier and less effective than the LPVO. The only upside is the eyebox is more forgiving, but if your cheek weld is at all consistent, there is no upside. Ironically though most of the time I fall back to the ACOG.

They're just not optimal for those sorts of scenarios Eyebox, FOV, acquisition, low light capability, all sorts of tiny little things Idk what LPVO fuckers want man We've been at this for a decade

You should absolutely train with an LPVO with an eyebox in close quarters. Do you actually think you're gonna get to swap your optic before you enter a house and then go back out into a feild, or always have the best optic for every fluid situation? Hell no dude.

Actual operators 🤔 Agreed high levels of skill can be achieved with an LVPO, I still don’t want to deal with an eyebox when doing CQB in mixed lighting etc

Sorry for answering your question with a question, have you tried to use an LVPO in mixed lighting / indoors and compared that to a RDS with no eyebox / one focal plane?

If you cannot train to place your eye in the eyebox. Then you will not train to use correctly this device.

Hey bro, yeah let’s talk about it. The first problem here is demanding that you want a gun that can do CQB and 600m engagements. With current technology, if you build a gun to meet those competing criteria you’ll end up with a fantasy weapon that excels at nothing. What I mean by that is our video game generation imagines themselves in a dystopian USA environment where they need one gun to solve any problem at any range. That is retarded because in that environment the people who will win will be the people who can mass the most guns, not the lone guy in a cloak with his do all super-gun. LVPOs, specifically second focal plane, are great for competitions that require shots from zero to 300-500m because you can go to 6x to hit that plate rack at 200 etc but the eyebox is still forgiving enough for it to be viable at close range. FFPs are great for 3 gun because of the glass clarity and the ability with the 1-10x to shoot well enough close range but excel with better glass at farther ranges (500m) without having to worry about holds the way you do with a 2FP. You also need match grade ammo and a good barrel, sorry the 4 MOA AR with 4 MOA ammo is not going to cut it in past 200-250m in a competition environment that has targets past those ranges. However, if we look at actual combat the average engagement range for GWOT was 70m. The simple solution for that is a rugged red dot and a magnifier if you need to shoot to 300m accurately or suppress at 4-5-6 etc. That’s why for me a duty build for general purpose war fighting / self defense is a 11.5” carbine with a RDS / Mag. A special purpose build for a DMR role etc would have a 2.5x - 10x or a 3x - 18x actual scope and be built around NAS3 cartridges so I could stretch to 1000m with an 80 ish grain OTM 5.56 round. But that gun would require that have a squad with me to support if we had to go indoors, and I would make do with an offset dot. Hope that makes sense.

Gets REALLY tight on the eyebox at the top end, it's most useful from 1X to 8X IMO. 10X is for when you reallllly need that extra power. Need perfect form from the shooter to really take advantage of the top end power.

That fucking eyebox though

Szyna Zentico czy tam inna i jazda, w sumie żadna filozofia, tylko eyebox wysoko

The ACOG is terrible and dated with the worst eyebox imaginable, and we only love them as a knee jerk, respect response to the operators that used them twenty years ago.