Another one on the @charmsai TikTok page 🔥
Just posted the latest UX upgrade, it now takes just 2 seconds to buy any character on Charms 😍
Gasless • 0% platform fees • Flashblock confirmations (<200ms)
Now supporting deposits from 10 chains, powered by @privy_io
The smoothest experience in the Character Economy just leveled up!
Watch it here 👇
vt.tiktok.com/ZSQQXkmJ9/
Let’s keep pushing @charmsai 🤝 on TikTok @0xJuan__ @Gon0x_ 💙
May 24
When a project like @charmsai builds the foundation for the Character Economy, the next step is capturing the attention of the masses. Been super impressed by @charmsai since discovering the $1.5M raise and the character economy vision.
Decided to build a dedicated TikTok page from scratch, posting your official launch videos in order (intro → $CHARMY → $FROGURT → $TYLER
→ $ZOE → $SCORPION → $BLIND tutorials & milestones).
1
1
37
Jun 13
然而，在下一个区块的第一个 Flashblock 中，价格会重新调整为更差的价格，而该价格正是实际交易的结算价格（平均亏损 5-10 个基点）。
propAMM 可以报出一个更小的价差供聚合商选择。在交易结算之前，propAMM 会扩大价差，导致交易最终落在价格范围的较大一端，从而利用“报价和结算之间的延迟”。
1
14
Jun 13
propAMM 也存在权衡取舍的问题，尤其是在设计和具体逻辑不透明或不公开的情况下。
过去，曾出现过一些由 propAMM 在 Base 上错误引用的例子。
每个区块的下一个 Flashblock（约 200 毫秒）最初会提供一个有吸引力的价格，因此聚合器会显示该价格。
1
11
Jun 12
Most @base bugs trace to one mistake: reading "latest" where the code needed "safe".
5 confirmation tiers you should know:
→ Flashblock: 200ms, sequencer preconf
→ latest: 2s, reversible
→ safe: 5–10 min, batch on Ethereum
→ finalized: 15–20 min, validators signed off
→ withdrawal: 7 days
Crediting a deposit on "latest" is how you lose money.
Full breakdown 👇🏻
chainstack.com/base-transact…
1
1
5
114
Jun 10
gBase everyone!
A common misconception: transactions on Base do NOT take 7 days to finalize.
⚡ Flashblock inclusion: ~200ms.
🔹 L2 block inclusion: ~2s.
🔹 L1 batch inclusion: ~2min.
🔒 Ethereum-level finality: ~20min.
The 7-day waiting period only applies to withdrawals from Base back to Ethereum and exists to support the Fault Proof security model.
For regular transfers, swaps, and onchain activity, Base delivers near-instant UX while inheriting Ethereum security.
Fast like an L2. Secure like Ethereum.
@base
Jun 4
Why Are Base Fees So Low?
Every transaction on Base includes two components:
🔹 L2 Fee - the cost of executing the transaction on Base.
🔹 L1 Fee - the cost of posting transaction data to Ethereum for security.
In many cases, the L1 fee makes up the largest portion of the total transaction cost.
Recent Update
Following the Jovian upgrade, Base introduced a Minimum Base Fee of 0.005 gwei to:
✅ Improve transaction inclusion speed.
✅ Make fees more predictable.
✅ Reduce network spam.
Even with this change, a typical transaction can cost as little as $0.002 when ETH is around $2,000.
Why It Matters?
Base uses Ethereum's EIP-1559 fee model, allowing gas prices to adjust smoothly without major spikes.
⚡ Fast transactions.
💸 Extremely low fees.
🔒 Ethereum-backed security.
Base continues to show why Layer 2 solutions are becoming the preferred choice for DeFi, NFTs, and on-chain applications.
@base
3
26
171
Jun 9
Current Metrics (updated today): TVL: 3.95B - $3.98B (slight decrease, but this has been across the general ETH network; stablecoins are hovering around 4.8B (mainly USDC)).
Aerodrome and Uniswap are strong leaders. Base is already competing with and surpassing Ethereum mainnet and BSC in weekly volumes during certain periods.
Activity: Hundreds of thousands of daily active addresses (MMAs of 320k), massive transactions, and real momentum in DeFi, memes, and payments. Technical Updates Post-Azul: Base Azul has been live on mainnet for 12 days.
Multi-testing (TEE ZK), its own client, faster withdrawals, and greater decentralization.
All stable, without Major incidents reported.
The next update is coming at the end of June: a consecrated token standard, Flashblock access lists, more UX improvements, and withdrawals. Then, one of the account abstractions in August. Base continues to innovate faster than most L2s.
Ecosystem and community activity (last few hours): Strong hype surrounding RWA/tokenization (active Securitize Rewards, integrations with cbBTC and Morpho).
Projects like Velox (DEX/swapper) are updating and receiving feedback from builders. L2 Base summer is heating up.
Stay active 🟦
@baseposting #base #CryptoPayments
#ethereum
1
5
58
Jun 5
Tail of >4 blocks is inclusion. mined_at - sent_at mixes RPC-to-sequencer forwarding, sequencer txpool depth, 200ms Flashblock fee ordering, and nonce stalls. What defines your two timestamps: local broadcast and full receipt, or sequencer ack and Flashblock preconfirmation?
2
7
Jun 4
Ethereum's native account abstraction proposal, EIP-8141, is still in draft status as of March 2026. Vitalik announced it on February 28, Hegota fork timeline puts mainnet rollout roughly a year out. Meanwhile the end-of-June upgrade on @base ships native account abstraction directly into protocol, alongside an enshrined token standard and Flashblock Access Lists.
That gap matters more than it looks. ERC-4337 account abstraction works today on Base via a separate bundler mempool and UserOperation flow. It's functional but layered: your transaction goes through a bundler, gets verified, then lands on-chain. Native AA collapses that stack. Accounts become programmable at the protocol level, gas sponsorship and custom signature schemes stop requiring external infrastructure, and the bundler overhead disappears. The UX difference for a new user is substantial. The developer simplification is larger.
Flashblock Access Lists are the less discussed piece. Flashblocks already cut confirmation times from 2 seconds to 200 milliseconds. Access Lists let specific addresses receive guaranteed preconfirmation slots. That's not a performance improvement for average users, it's infrastructure for high-frequency DeFi, latency-sensitive AI agent pipelines, and any protocol where ordering certainty has economic value.
Base is shipping Ethereum's roadmap faster than Ethereum. Whether that's a structural advantage or a risk depends entirely on whether the June upgrade lands on time.
120
119
899
May 27
Empty blocks on @base dropped from roughly 200 per day to around 2. Not from a traffic spike or a fee adjustment. From consolidating onto a single execution client, base-reth-node, paired with a new consensus client built on OP Kona. That's the Azul upgrade in one data point.
The more interesting shift is the multiproof system: TEE proofs and ZK proofs running in parallel, either capable of finalizing independently. When both agree, withdrawal finality compresses to one day. Most of the L2 decentralization conversation focuses on governance and sequencer control. Azul makes the case that proof architecture is where Stage 2 actually gets earned, not where tokens get distributed.
What I keep coming back to is the upgrade cadence signal. Azul is Base's first mainnet upgrade on its own schedule, fully independent of Optimism Superchain coordination. A performance upgrade targeting enshrined token standards and Flashblock access lists lands at end of June. Native account abstraction follows at end of August. Three major upgrades in roughly three months, all running on Base's own timeline, on Base's own client stack.
The $250K Immunefi audit competition running through May 4 is the detail that matters most here. Shipping fast and running a public bug bounty simultaneously is a reasonable posture. Whether the audit coverage matched the scope of what went to mainnet on May 13 is a question worth sitting with.
111
1
107
712
May 24
Seeing lots of rumors about BASE token mentions in the Base GitHub repo, and people getting excited about a possible drop.
But from what’s visible in the code, this does not look like confirmation of an incoming official $BASE token.
> BaseToken looks like dev/token factory code
> Minting logic ≠ public token launch
> “snapshot” here means code state data, not an airdrop snapshot
> Flashblock snippet = performance benchmark
> GitHub code ≠ TGE confirmation
> No official $BASE airdrop announced yet
So yes, there is token related infrastructure in the repo, but nothing here confirms the rumors.
1
10
995
May 24
believe it is not: Key details from the code:
• It sets up flashblock data (setup_flashblock_data).
• Builds a chain of accumulated snapshots (each snapshot includes all prior deltas current one).
• For each snapshot size, it runs black_box(provider.state_root_with_updates(...)) in a loop.
• The goal is to measure how fast the state root trie updates computation is when you have to do it very frequently (many times per second) for Flashblocks.
1
1
4
510
May 23
Things on the Base side are starting to get seriously interesting. 👀
First, the “Base native token” references spotted inside GitHub code and now these leaked flashblock testing snippets have everyone talking.
But the most interesting part is the appearance of terms like “snapshots” and “Criterion.”
Are these really just technical testing parameters? Or are we hearing the first footsteps of potential airdrop criteria quietly being shaped behind the scenes?
Because we’ve seen this pattern before with many projects: When the snapshot finally arrives, what matters isn’t just transaction count it’s the organic footprint you leave on chain.
Wallets spamming volume for the sake of farming?
Or users who consistently stay active on chain, interact naturally with different protocols, and genuinely live inside the Base ecosystem?
I think that’s the real question now. If a snapshot happened unexpectedly today, how satisfied would you honestly be with your current Base history?
Because this narrative seems to be evolving beyond:
“How many transactions did you make?”
into:
“How real of a user were you actually on the network?”
And honestly…
In the end, consistency always beats artificial volume.
Maybe the people who will truly be rewarded are the ones who’ve been quietly building, interacting, and behaving like real builders on Base for months. 🔵
@baseposting @base $BASE
May 22
Things seem to be heating up on the Base side. 👀
Technical tests shared through Base’s official GitHub account revealed direct references to native token infrastructure.
What especially caught attention were the benchmark tests focused on token factory and precompile systems.
These kinds of tests usually suggest that the team is preparing the groundwork for a potential token economy.
There’s still no official confirmation yet, but it’s pretty clear that serious development is happening behind the scenes.
Long story short the Base team might not be sitting idle after all. 🚀
@baseposting @base $BASE
14
16
108
May 23
Base cephesinde işler iyice ciddileşmeye başladı. GitHub kodlarında "@Base native token" ibaresinin yakalanmasının ardından, şimdi de flashblock test süreçlerine dair sızan bu kodlar ortalığı hareketlendirdi.
Buradaki snapshots ve Criterion kelimeleri sadece teknik birer test parametresi mi, yoksa arkada sessiz sedasız işleyen airdrop kriterlerinin ayak sesleri mi?
Eğer bu bir testten fazlasıysa ve birileri "snapshot çoktan alındı bile" diyorsa, şu an @base üzerindeki cüzdan geçmişinizle ne kadar güvendesiniz?
Hacim peşinde koşup sistemi spamleyenler için belki endişe verici bir durum ama her gün düzenli olarak on-chain olan, kontratlarla gerçek bir builder gibi etkileşime giren ve ağda organik bir iz bırakanlar için asıl ödül dönemi şimdi başlıyor olabilir. Çünkü biliyoruz ki günün sonunda her zaman istikrar, suni hacmi döver.
Eğer şu an bir snapshot gelseydi, @base üzerindeki mevcut on-chain aktivitenizden ne kadar memnun kalırdınız? İçiniz rahat mı, yoksa "keşke biraz daha erken ve düzenli davransaydım" diyenlerden misiniz?
@baseposting @base $Base
4
5
40
1,890
May 22
@base 接下来的动作是否有种似曾相识的感觉。没错这个跟当初 ZK 很像。先公布代币经济学，再来个抽象功能，稳定币抵扣gas。
Base官方Base Azul 。这是Base 链的首个独立网络升级。升级后空块数量减少 99%、支持最高5000 TPS。
6月底：性能升级（原生代币标准、Flashblock Access Lists、Glamsterdam EIPs、单二进制客户端、更快提现）
8月底：用户体验升级（原生账户抽象）
看到这里，说明还没快照，一切都来得及！
详情：blog.base.dev/introducing-ba…
May 22
经常出金的多少都有被冻卡或被请去喝茶询问的经历吧；做跨境电商等，也会经常遇到Stripe 等账号被封经历吧。资金动不动被冻结 XXX天，申诉到头秃；好不容易结汇，银行到账慢得像蜗牛，还要吃掉你大几个点的跨境手续费。最难的是，对于很多小商户和 KOL 来说，小额交易还要去搭个复杂的 Shopify、搞一套合规，客户买个东西还要跳出好几页，转化率低。说白了就是web2中心化的弊端。
今天给大家安利一个收款神器@allscaleio 。总融资$6.5M，Seed轮由YZi Labs等领投、Draper Dragon、Amber Group跟投、BSC官方生态合作伙伴，团队背景也很硬核来自 IBM、Amazon、OceanBase等。
简单科普一下，AllScale 是一个自托管稳定币数字银行，说白就是做支付这方面等，类似于支付宝这类产品。与支付宝最大的不同点就在于“自托管”和“稳定币支付”。资金直接进你自己的加密钱包，不经过任何第三方，彻底告别了传统支付网关“说封号就封号、说冻结就冻结”的噩梦。
AllScale旗下最让我惊艳的产品就是 Telegram Store。直接把Tg群直接变成你的稳定币店铺！零代码、零前端、零域名，对小商户和KOL的吸引力太大了。你的群就是店铺，客户全程不用离开Tg，就能浏览商品、下单、付款。跟当年宝妈群代购很像，只是更有保障，体验更流畅了。
开店步骤（详细步骤看图）：
第一步： 浏览器打开 allscale.store，点击创建店铺。
第二步： 像上架闲鱼一样，填个商品标题、价格、传个图。
第三步： 一键绑定你的 Telegram Bot。系统会生成一个专属的 Web App 链接或卡片。
买家通过点商品按钮 → 跳转AllScale Checkout → 用USDT/USDC付款 → 看到“Fund sent” 链上Tx Hash，商家瞬间收到款项。0秒到账、没有拒付风险、手续费极低。对于全世界的小商户和 KOL 来说，这种在私域里闭环的“电报原生购物体验”，转化率直接拉满！
除此之外AllScale 官方刚刚推出了一个极其暴利的 Partner Program（合伙人推荐计划）。你推荐商户接入AllScale Checkout（含Telegram Store），就能赚持续佣金：
推荐人： 只要商户通过你的链接入驻并产生交易，第一年你可以直接躺赚他们交易手续费的 25% 作为佣金（往后递减）。只要你推几个流水大的独立站老板，这笔税后收入非常恐怖。
被推荐商户： 别人直接注册没优惠，但通过你的合伙人链接入驻，商户可以享受前 3 个月手续费 10% 的直接折扣。可以说是互利共赢。
参与链接：app.allscale.io/pay/register…
AllScale 这种用稳定币重构私域支付的玩法，绝对是接下来的大趋势。这项目背景好，支付也算当前热门赛道，看好的可以去体验体验。
9
2
9
8,216
May 14
🌿 Base Azul is a major step forward for Base ⚡
🟦 ~99% reduction in empty blocks 🌊
🟦Sustained 5,000 TPS bursts ⚡
🟦Multiproof-powered Stage 2 decentralization
🟦Faster withdrawals stronger security
🟦Osaka spec alignment for a smoother dev UX 🧩
🌞 What is upcoming:
@Base is moving fast
→ June: performance upgrades Flashblock Access Lists 🌞
→ August: native account abstraction 🌱
→ Vibenet devnet launching for public experimentation 🌊
Independent upgrades. Faster iteration. Real scalability. 🌿
5
1
11
192