Most people are still out here grading Trump’s foreign policy like it’s some goddamn high school popularity contest. Did it look presidential enough? Did the Europeans get their feelings hurt? Did the headlines stay pretty for a couple days? That’s the entire fucking standard these idiots are using.
That’s not strategy. That’s pure fucking vibes, and anyone still measuring it that way is either stupid or lying.
The only real test is simple as hell: is China stronger or weaker than it was? Is Beijing gaining more cheap oil, more obedient client states, more military reach, and more untouchable aura? Or is it getting its ass kicked on every single one of those fronts at the same time?
Look at the actual scoreboard. Iran went from China’s top oil supplier and regional muscle to a broke, blockaded mess watching its nuclear leverage get strangled.
Venezuela’s regime got taken out and took Beijing’s dirty oil hustle with it.
Russia showed up in China acting like a serious power and left looking like a broke, bloodied fucking liability that torched hundreds of billions and hundreds of thousands of men for nothing.
Inside China the military’s been gutted by purges, the demographics are collapsing, and the economy isn’t the unstoppable machine they spent years jerking themselves off over.
So here’s the real question: if the main enemy is losing energy routes, losing regional allies, losing military cohesion, and losing strategic momentum across multiple theaters, why the fuck are we still pretending the only thing that matters is whether it looked messy on TV?
Until people stop jerking off to cable news mood rings and start judging this shit by the actual scoreboard, they’re not analyzing foreign policy. They’re just consuming whatever narrative the media shits out that week.
(article below)