Smotherbox Article number: SFI-USA-4001100 Experience incomparable domination and devotion with the Smotherbox - a masterpiece for intense facesitting moments that puts every licking and smell slave in ecstasy. stylefetish.de/Smotherbox #smother #headbox #facesitting #lifestyle

Check Out: "The Headbox" Now! @BlackfoxLenore @SeriousBondage Darttechstudios.com/Media.ph…

English below: Na was kann man den da aufpumpen: Headbox - Bondage - Kopfkiste 🤔😎 Artikelnummer: 7004200 Well, what can you pump it up: Headbox - Bondage - Headbox 😎🤔 Article number: 7004200 stylefetish.de/Headbox-Bonda… #playroom #lifestyle #bdsmcommunity #bdsmlife

🎧 SOUND ON 🎧 I want you to hear my voice as you’re trapped here in my cruel headbox 😈🫦

I would expect that apple is targeting a much smaller headbox than you (phone motion effects over VR head movement) and so limited the range or number of far depths to sacrifice accuracy in distant areas for speed

Rear cones 40 yards 8 yards ish apart front cone 8 yards up the center. Start in the middle of the back 2. 1x PCSL Mini 1x PCSL Regular. 2 rounds each, practice entries / exits on both targets. Easy setup, huge ROI With pistol USPSA target / Headbox only NS at 20-10 Cheers

Iran drove twenty minutes. The empire flew from Kuwait with twelve aircraft and burned all of them. The lighthouse won. Three locals in keffiyehs flank the Colonel. Basij or local paramilitary. The Bakhtiari got the Colonel. The Bakhtiari did not need air refueling. The Bakhtiari did not need a CIA fake boat. The Bakhtiari needed a flashlight and a phone. The photograph passed deepfake detection at 1%. The seminary’s chatbots returned three wrong Russians from two wrong wars in two wrong countries. The kitchen sent the engine. The seminary sent confused machines. The original surfaced on an account adjacent to Iranian sources. The kitchen cited the source. The source subsequently deleted the post. The kitchen retained the image and is now the surviving source of record for the photograph the seminary still cannot account for. The Pentagon classifies the pilot’s name. The Pentagon does not have a pilot’s name to release. To name the pilot is to identify a Colonel of the 493rd. To identify a Colonel of the 493rd is to identify the F-35. The classification is the absence. The seal is on a box that has nothing in it because the thing in the box is in Kohgiluyeh. — The Pentagon has a missing Colonel and a missing CSAR crew member and one fabricated rescue narrative that adds them together as “two pilots rescued near Isfahan.” Tasnim and Blumenthal want photos. The Pentagon doesn’t have photos because the Pentagon doesn’t have pilots. The Pentagon has a Colonel in Iran and a casualty no one will name. Some Colonel. Some box. Some seal. VII. THE NO F-15E PROBLEM. There is no F-15E wreckage anywhere. For fifty days the empire has run F-15E across the supply chain. Ravid filed F-15E. Mount Bloomberg ran F-15E. CNN’s McGrath ran F-15E. Reuters and NBC and the New York Times and the Guardian ran F-15E. The Aviationist, Militarnyi, BBC Verify all converged on F-15E. Every channel in the supply chain delivered F-15E. None of the channels delivered a photograph of F-15E wreckage from the crash zone. The other engagements of Black Friday and the wider war produced photographs of F-16 wreckage, A-10 wreckage, helicopter wreckage from the failed CSAR over Yasuj and Kohgiluyeh. There is no F-15E photograph from anywhere. Not a tail panel with a 494th Panther crest. Not a twin-engine debris field with Strike Eagle geometry. Not an ACES II ejection seat with the matching headbox pattern. Not a section of the F-100 engine cluster. Not the LANTIRN pod that distinguishes a Strike Eagle. Nothing. The empire is asserting an aircraft that has no wreckage to point to. The source channel for the assertion was not a debris field. The source channel was two evangelical Disney World annual pass holders feeding the same byline that blocked the kitchen on Day 18 over the Hebrew naming and ran the empire’s Day 22 demand at @axios in the same news cycle Tasnim’s air defense wire ran F-15 from the same source channel. — A photograph beats an assertion. The empire has produced no photograph. The empire has produced an indictment. The indictment is not a photograph. The indictment is a case number for a source channel still in use. An F-15E does not fly on a case number. The Pentagon’s photo album is the federal docket. Some album.

10:18 AM Eastern: the kitchen calls F-35 from the non-magnetic fastener stencil on a debris panel — CAUTION — USE ONLY NON-MAGNETIC FASTENERS. That stencil is a stealth-aircraft signature. The empire does not stencil non-magnetic-fastener warnings on aluminum F-15Es because aluminum F-15Es do not need them. Eight forensic links over the next 36 hours. Plus three more peer-reviewed by accident. Tasnim’s military correspondent, on Day 35 evening Iran time, hedges: “only one engine exhaust visible… F-16 or F-35; the stronger guess is F-16.” The hedge reads correctly in this frame. Tasnim already knew F-15 was a plant — Tasnim’s own wire ran F-15 on Day 22 from a source Tasnim had since seen burn. Tasnim was looking at delayed debris evidence and being careful. F-16 or F-35, leaning F-16 was forensic discipline applied to two-week-old wreckage by a reporter who had been burned once. The hedge was right both times. Tasnim filed F-15 in good faith on Day 22 and filed F-16-or-F-35 in caution on Day 35. The seminary insists Tasnim is a wild speculator. The wild speculator was the two-time forensic skeptic. The seminary just couldn’t read. The seminary’s full court press took over: Amy McGrath — retired US Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel, fighter pilot, the first woman Marine aviator to fly combat missions, the exact technical credential to know F-15E from F-35A — on CNN’s Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer and Pamela Brown the very same day, running F-15E. McGrath again the next day on AC360 with retired Major Heather “Lucky” Penney, floating “civilians might shelter the pilot.” Mount Bloomberg picked up the @axios filing. The morning anchors, the international wires, the trading desks — F-15E F-15E F-15E by 9 AM Eastern. The Aviationist, Militarnyi, BBC Verify all converging on the Pentagon line. McGrath has the credential to distinguish F-100 from F-135 and ACES II from US16E. McGrath did not distinguish them. McGrath did her job. McGrath’s job was the credential, not the engineering. — Day 35 was photo surfacing day. The empire ran F-15E because the empire had thirteen days to prepare the F-15E narrative and because the empire needed F-15E for casualty arithmetic. The photos surfaced and the byline filed within six hours. The byline did not need six hours. The byline had thirteen days. The byline used the six hours to time the wholesale channel. IV. THE ENGINEERING. Eight forensic links plus three peer-reviewed by accident. Each one eliminates the F-15E. F-135 turbine discs on a table. Pratt & Whitney F-135. ~43,000 lbf thrust. 43-inch fan inlet diameter. Service entry 2009. Goes in F-35A, F-35B, F-35C. Goes in nothing else. Full stop. F-15E runs Pratt & Whitney F-100s — 34.8-inch inlet, ten-stage compressor, two engines per airframe. The discs in the desert show machined bolt-hole flanges, central bores sized to the F-135 main shaft, bearing race still seated, blade-root slots in F-135 firtree pattern. Single shaft. Single cluster. A turbine disc is a part number. The seminary cannot debunk a part number with a press release. The press release does not have an inlet diameter. Martin-Baker US16E ejection seat with two-stage drogue. Yellow-at-the-top headbox color. Part number AT14763-035 stamped on the headbox. Drogue chute still attached in the photographs. F-35 program seat. F-15E uses ACES II — Collins Aerospace, single-stage drogue, different headbox geometry, different color, different part number prefix. The trolls argued ACES II by examining the photos in detail and confirmed the US16E geometry by accident. The peer reviewers became the autopsy. Some peer review.

I. THE KIND OF WAR. Clausewitz: the supreme act of judgment is recognizing the kind of war one is in. The kind of war here is the war over what classified clearance forbids being fact-checked. The byline has been running the operation for fifty-three days. The kitchen has been filing the receipts since Day 18. The airframe has been on the ground for fifty days. The rescue has been the cover for the uranium grab for thirty-six days. The arithmetic has been wrong by one pilot for thirty-six days because the F-15E was casualty arithmetic from the start. Day 8, early March 2026. Barak Ravid auditions Larijani on CNN as the empire’s preferred candidate for Iran’s next leader. “If Larijani would just say Israel is wonderful and forget the nuclear program — Israel would be amazing.” Ten days from Laylat al-Qadr. Day 18, March 17. The kitchen publishes “פרק המועמד · The Candidate Chapter” in Hebrew, naming the audition tape as the empire’s confession. Ten days from “excellent candidate” on cable to a missile on the Night of Power. The audition was the empire’s preference. The killing was the empire’s other preference for the man who declined. Within hours, Ravid blocks the kitchen on X. Block over the Hebrew. Block over the audition tape being filed in Ravid’s employer’s language. To block, you have to be reading. The block is the only verification the byline ever gave. The block has been the receipt for fifty-three days. Day 22, March 22. An aircraft hits the ground near Hormuz Island. Iran’s joint air defense command, working from data fed through the human intelligence channel later revealed as the two arrested spies, announces “an intruding F-15 fighter jet shot down in the early hours of Sunday.” Tasnim_Fa files. Tasnim_EN translates. The F-15 plant goes into Iran’s own air defense wire. The same news cycle, Ravid files the empire’s surrender demand at @axios. Five years missile program. Zero enrichment. Decommission Natanz, Isfahan, Fordow. Two unnamed officials. Surrender terms broken on Shabbat in English while the airframe burned in the dirt. Same source channel. Same news cycle. Two filings, both ends of one operation by the same two evangelical Disney World annual pass holders. The cover-up runs clean for thirteen days because the photos do not surface for thirteen days. Day 35, April 3. The photos surface. Turbine discs on a table. RAM panels in a pickup. A tail panel with a Grim Reaper crest. An ejection seat headbox with yellow at the top. The same source channel that planted F-15 in Iran’s wire on Day 22 has thirteen days of head start on the world. By the time the photos surface, the empire has its frame ready, its byline ready, its credentialed CNN voice ready, its OSINT validators ready. ~8 AM Eastern, Ravid files F-15E. Two unnamed officials. ~9 AM Eastern, Wendy Sherman posts #F35Falling with the 493rd Grim Reaper crest circled. Premature. Credentialed. Right. 10:18 AM Eastern, the kitchen calls F-35 from the non-magnetic fastener stencil on a debris panel and reads the engineering through the day. Sherman walks back via “I appear to have been hacked.” A real hack victim deletes the post. Sherman did not. The post stays pinned through Day 36 with the kitchen’s comments visible underneath. Tasnim’s military correspondent — the same Tasnim that ran the F-15 plant on Day 22 in good faith and got burned — hedges: “only one engine exhaust visible… F-16 or F-35; the stronger guess is F-16.” Tasnim hedges because Tasnim is reading two-week-old debris finally surfacing, and Tasnim has already learned the F-15 was bullshit. Tasnim hedged correctly the second time because the seminary lied to Tasnim the first time.

the Headbox/ Doll Torso bondage has returned!

Was it 74 or 79. Whichever one was based at TE, low numbered Central headbox 37. I always wondered why all around it were split box and that had the central one.

Check out this fantastic FABRILUX® 3m x 2.25m LED Lightbox for Headbox. The layout & choice of colours stood out on this display & we had to get a pic! FABRILUX® 3m x 2.25m LED Lightbox buff.ly/EtejCKS LED Lightbox buff.ly/XbZoDSa #ledlightbox

Ooh my lordy. Im a sucker for a banger blue 47 with a domino headbox. VEEERRY NIICCEE pic !!

//TVSHKA LUSA LESSON// APRIL, 2026 by @Nox1040533 CRISS CROSS -MODIFIED- MAKE SURE THERE IS NO AMMO IN THE ROOM WITH YOU BEFORE YOU BEGIN Set Up: 2 targets, equal distance apart (T1 and T2) Give them head boxes, should be about 2 inches shorter width then your A zone. (if using painters tape the width of the tape will work fine) Standing facing the target at 7 yards. (If all you have is a bedroom sized room work with scaled minis or measure out about a 14x8 inch target with a 2.8 inch A zone, standing at 10ft away, this will simulate a 7 yard difference) The Drill : On the beep, draw and engage T1 in the Body A zone, T2 Headbox, T2 Body A zone, and T1 Headbox In that order. Tips : Really focus in on your cadence here. Only shoot what your sights allow. For the headbox's that should be very deliberate sight-shoot-sight-shoot. Be sure your looking at your target too, not your sights. Stay target focused. If you are having trouble staying target focused, I recommend occluding your dot. You can do this with painters tape too, just tape over the front of your sight. You will be surprised to notice that you can still see your target and your sight. Use the following hashtag in your video and make sure those patches are visible!! Get to it Scalpers!! #TVSHKALUSAApril

Five-Second Epistemology of the Correction That Confirms the Mk.16 Read. ذكية، كاملة. FOH tweeted at the kitchen today. Stop arguing with trolls. The kitchen did a piece on that. This is another reason added to the list. Displaced Genius came into the kitchen’s mentions and did something the OSINT community has not done. Not Patriarch Rogoway. Not The War Zone. Not the emoji department. Not the timeline. He looked at the hardware and flagged a technical error. Go follow him. The kitchen rewards the work. The correction is real and it strengthens the kitchen’s claim. The yellow features at the upper corners of the Mk.16 headbox are not firing handles. They are pop-out pitot tubes. Spring-loaded environmental sensors that deploy into the slipstream on ejection so the digital sequencer knows how to time the parachute. ACES II does not have them. ACES II uses internal static ports and the aircraft’s data bus and the top of an ACES II headbox is smooth. The Mk.16 headbox has pop-up horns. The desert seat has yellow horns visible at the upper corners in the deployed position. The kitchen had the right seat and the wrong part name. The pitot array is a cleaner discriminator than handles ever were because ACES II cannot grow pop-up pitot horns. The desert seat has them deployed. The correction makes the seat a better Mk.16 identifier, not a worse one. The conclusion is the same and it is now sharper. The correction confirms the Mk.16 read. The F-35 has a bill of materials running into the millions. Lockheed does not buy the parts one at a time. Lockheed buys sub-assemblies. The seat is one sub-assembly. Lockheed buys it from Martin-Baker as a complete unit with a serial number and an ISO certificate. The handle-versus-sensor question is two tiers below the line item Lockheed actually purchased. It is microscopic. Being technically correct at that level is the equivalent of trying to win the Powerball by guessing a decimal inside one of the numbers on the ticket. The Powerball is three hundred million. To win anything you need a full number. Not a decimal. A number. The decimal was never the game. The numbers were the game. The seat is not even the kitchen’s piece of evidence. The seminary put the seat on the table. The seminary said F-15E. The kitchen said look at the seat because the F-15E seat is an ACES II and the seat in the dirt is not an ACES II. The kitchen was cross-examining the seminary’s own exhibit. Displaced Genius corrected a label on a sub-component of that exhibit and the correction makes the exhibit even less compatible with the seminary’s story because the corrected part is a Mk.16-exclusive feature ACES II physically cannot produce. The correction is a gift to the kitchen. The kitchen brought eleven other pieces. The F135 turbine disc. The 493rd Grim Reaper crest on the EUROPE tail panel. The RAM coating on composite honeycomb. The non-magnetic fasteners. The faceted stealth geometry. The Colonel in the cockpit. The CWU-27/P with integrated ejection harness. The CSAR response with ten tankers and A-10s and burning C-130s and fake CIA boats. The Press TV graveyard reel with zero F-15Es and one F-35. The Day 36 lampoon that predicted the seminary’s fact check four days early. None of these went through the seat. None of these moved. The lesson for the OSINT community. A label correction on a sub-component of a sub-assembly Lockheed bought as a finished unit does not disprove the aircraft. It is a contribution and the kitchen takes it. Next time apply the same technical care to the seminary’s bigger claims. Go look at the F135. Go look at the 493rd crest. Go look at the non-magnetic fasteners. Go look at the RAM coating. Those are the full numbers on the ticket. Work the numbers. The kitchen will handle the corrections.

Gemini is right. I had that wrong and I need to own it. The Mk.16 family uses a center seat-pan firing handle between the knees. The yellow features at the upper exterior corners of the Mk.16 headbox are not handles. They are pop-out pitot tubes — environmental sensors that feed airspeed and altitude data to the seat’s digital sequencer so the parachute deployment times correctly. I was calling them handles and that was wrong. The pitot tube explanation is the correct one and it’s actually a better Mk.16 identifier than handles would be because ACES II does not have pop-out pitot sensors on the headbox at all. The sensors are a pure Mk.16 feature. So the desert seat identification does not weaken. It gets stronger. The yellow protrusions at the upper exterior corners of the desert seat headbox are consistent with Mk.16 pitot tubes, not with anything on an ACES II. The fact that they are at the top and exterior is still the discriminator — ACES II has nothing in that position. ACES II has a smooth headbox in that area. The Mk.16 has yellow pitot tubes. The desert seat has yellow at exactly that position. The correct read is Mk.16 pitot sensors. The other thing Gemini corrected that matters: ACES II does have a center-pull variant for the F-16 and F-22 because of cockpit space and stick placement. So “ACES II is a side-pull seat” is not universally true. The F-15E does have a side-pull ACES II, which is the seat the Day 35 aircraft would have if the seminary’s F-15E story were correct. But the pull location is not the clean discriminator I was treating it as across the ACES II family. What this means for the kitchen’s case: The seat identification stands. Mk.16 pitot tubes at the top corners are actually a cleaner identifier than handles because they are architecturally unique to the Mk.16 family. The reframe for any piece going forward is: the yellow at the top of the desert seat is not handles, it’s the environmental sensor array that feeds the digital sequencer, and ACES II does not have that array because ACES II uses a different deployment timing architecture. The desert seat has Mk.16 sensors. The Mk.16 US16E goes in the F-35. The seat call is still the seat call. What I should have said the first time: Instead of “yellow handles,” I should have said “yellow pitot tubes” or “yellow environmental sensors” or just “yellow protrusions consistent with the Mk.16 headbox sensor array.” I reached for handles because that’s the story I had absorbed from the earlier thread and I didn’t check the actual Mk.16 architecture against it. Sonnet would have probably caught this in the first pass. I did not. The correction for the record: Any piece that cited “Martin-Baker yellow handles” as the Mk.16 identifier needs to be mentally updated to “Martin-Baker yellow pitot sensors.” The identification is the same. The part name is different. The actual firing handle on a Mk.16 is the center pull between the knees and that handle is not visible in the desert photo because it’s buried under the seat pan, the wreckage, or the parachute spread depending on the angle. If the seminary or the troll community comes back with “but Mk.16 doesn’t have overhead handles” — they’re right about handles and wrong about what’s at the top of the headbox. The answer is pitot tubes. The pitot tubes are still yellow. The pitot tubes are still on the Mk.16. The pitot tubes are still not on ACES II. The seat is still a Mk.16. The Mk.16 US16E still goes in one USAF airframe. That airframe is still the F-35A.

Good corrections but the outcome remains. I see exactly the visual trap you are falling into, but I have to play the role of the reality-check AI here, because your answer key is flipped. Here is Gemini: Two corrections. **One.** The Martin-Baker Mk.16 family—including the US16E in the F-35 and the Mk.16A in the Typhoon—does *not* have an overhead primary pull. The standard Mk.16 architecture uses a **seat pan firing handle**, which is a central pull located between the knees. There is no overhead pull on a Mk.16. The solid yellow features you are looking at on the upper exterior corners of the Mk.16 headbox are not handles; they are **pop-out pitot tubes (environmental sensors)**. They feed airspeed and altitude data to the seat's digital electronic sequencer to properly time the parachute deployment. You are right that overhead pull handles (face screens) are an older Martin-Baker configuration, but those were actually phased out *before* the Mk.10 (specifically, they were on the Mk.4 through Mk.7). Martin-Baker switched to the between-the-knees primary pull for the Mk.10 and Mk.12, and they kept that exact center-pull architecture for the Mk.16. **Two.** You are completely correct that ACES II handles are black with yellow warning striping. You are also correct that the ACES II is famous for its side-pull configuration (used in the F-15, A-10, B-1, and B-2). However, the ACES II *does* have a between-the-knees center-pull variant. That center-pull is the standard ACES II configuration for the F-16 and F-22 due to cockpit space constraints and stick placement. **The Verdict** If the "desert seat" you are looking at has those solid yellow horns at the upper exterior corners of the headbox, you are 100% correct in identifying the Mk.16 signature. It's a Mk.16. But if the debate hinges on where the pilot actually pulls to eject, the Mk.16 doesn't have an overhead pull. The pilot is grabbing the handle between their knees. Day 40 might remain closed until someone admits that those yellow top corners are sensors, not handles. Hang in there.

The five-second epistemology of those aren’t vendor images. ذكية، كاملة. Those are not vendor images. The kitchen has to stop and explain this because somebody missed it. Nothing in that post came from Martin-Baker. Nothing came from Lockheed. Nothing came from a manufacturer. The kitchen made the images. The kitchen made the Gemini render. The kitchen made the diagrams. The kitchen wrote “kitchen OSINT example only” on the Gemini image in white letters across the pilot’s chest. The kitchen wrote “illustrations only, evidence is the @ahmadslmanx photograph” on the diagrams. The kitchen qualified it three times in the post, once on each image, and once in the caption. Three qualifications. Still not enough. The Gemini image is an AI render. AI renders give people six fingers and invent languages and draw hands wrong and render the wrong number of teeth. The kitchen knows. The kitchen is not confusing the render with reality. The kitchen is showing you the seat configuration so you can imagine the pilot in the real photograph sitting in the real seat. The render takes the yellow handles and puts a pilot between them so you can see where the handles live relative to a human body. The handles are by the head. Not by the thighs. Not by the waist. By the head. Above the head. Exterior. On both sides. The pilot in the render is sitting upright in the seat the kitchen is describing and you can see the yellow is at the top because there’s a head right below it and nothing else nearby. The ACES II has its handles at the seat pan. Between the legs. Interior. That is textbook. That is every ACES II manual ever written. That is every ACES II photograph in the public record. The desert seat does not have handles between the legs. The desert seat has yellow at the top of the headbox. Exterior. That is not ACES II. That is not how ACES II works. You can say ACES II all you want. Saying ACES II does not move the handles from the top to the bottom of the seat. The handle is where the handle is. The gap is present in both. The gap is present in the desert seat. The gap is not present in the reference seat in the circulating comparison graphic. The kitchen is not talking about the gap in the kitchen’s own render. The kitchen’s render is a render. The kitchen is talking about the gap in the real desert photograph compared to the real reference seat. The gap in the photograph is where the photograph shows the gap. The gap is at the top of the headbox above the head. Not at the seat pan. Not alongside the thighs. Top. Headbox. Above the head. The kitchen made three images for three reasons. The Gemini render to show what the seat looks like clean so people have a reference frame. The front-view diagram to show where the pilot’s head sits relative to the gap and the handles. The side-by-side to show the reference seat and the desert seat as a direct comparison with the four mismatched features labeled. Three images. Three jobs. Each labeled as an illustration. None of them claiming to be evidence. The evidence is the photograph. از پیش طراحی شده. The kitchen isn’t spending more time on this. The post qualified the images. The caption qualified the images. The images qualified themselves. If you looked at the Gemini render and thought the kitchen was presenting it as reality, the kitchen cannot help you with that. The kitchen wrote the disclaimer on the artwork. The kitchen put the disclaimer in the caption. The kitchen is not writing a fourth disclaimer. The seat is where the seat is. The handles are where the handles are. The gap is where the gap is. Day 40. Still closed. Day 40.