คนที่เกิดมาไม่เคยมี suicidal ideation ในหัวเลยมันเป็นฟีลลิ่งแบบไหนกันนะ อยากเข้าไปค้นในหัว อยากลองเอาความรู้สึกของคนประเภทนี้มาสวมใส่ เวลาเจอปัญหาต่างๆ ชอยส์ของเขามีอะไรบ้าง

my boobs are so big because that’s where the suicidal ideation is stored

why must it be both extremes? the AI slop issue is real, the solution is better ways to use AI instead of going back to manual ideation, manual research, manual creation...

Thetanuts x APUBCC Workshop Join us as we explore how decentralised options are powering the next wave of on-chain innovation. 💡Ideation Challenge 🎁Mini prizes 🎤 Benjamin Hor & Shawn Chee 📣19 June 2026 7:00 PM – 9:30 PM 📍 S-08-02, APU

Unpopular take: most ppl are living with longterm suicidal ideation.

My SDU suicidal ideation tier list

Getting DMs from people asking me questions I have already covered in my guides 📌 repost bookmark them 1- scriptwriting guide: flscommunity.kit.com/scriptw… 2- adsense masterclass: flscommunity.kit.com/adsense 3- $10k/month guide: flscommunity.kit.com/10kmont… 4- ideation guide: flscommunity.kit.com/aipg 5- appeal video: flscommunity.kit.com/appealv… 6- cloning guide: flscommunity.kit.com/cloning… 7- channels/email limit guide: flscommunity.kit.com/emailgu… 8- RPM guide: flscommunity.kit.com/rpm 9- subs hack: flscommunity.kit.com/subscri… 10- beginners guide: flscommunity.kit.com/beginne… 11- 10 channels in 24 hours: flscommunity.kit.com/10chann… 12- fast monetization: flscommunity.kit.com/monetiz… 13- channel revival guide: flscommunity.kit.com/revive 14- warmup guide: flscommunity.kit.com/warmup 15- compilation guide: flscommunity.kit.com/compile 16- Inauthentic content: flscommunity.kit.com/inauthe… If you want me to build a monetized channel for you: flsadvanced.com/

Are u saying that she is responsible for his suicide? How? I would never let her off the hook for her choice in mate. We all are bombarded with negative relationship externalities and the only thing that is up to us is how we respond. Once again. I would understand this if she had taken his kids or depleted his assets, but none of this happened. He just had a history of depression and suicidal ideation that predated her. Once again, her mistake was marrying him and thinking she could save him with her love or some stupid crap.

I have a ruthless approach to suicide because I’ve dealt with fairly relentless suicidal ideation since I was 12 years old. I have found that establishing an unyielding mental wall against it is the most effective method to ensure I never actually partake in it. Moreover, extensive research since the 19th century has repeatedly demonstrated the social contagion effect instigated by actual suicide events and by social contexts wherein in it is condoned rather than condemned. That is why I am again, ruthless in condemning it, rather than making excuses for it. The Catholic Church takes a fairly similar approach, which is why suicide remains a mortal sin, and is never framed as something over which a person has no choice & no control. Anyway my logic regarding all this is quite simple, if vocally condemning suicide from my silly little platform prevents even one suicidal person from thinking that people will posthumously remember them fondly and affectionately, and that prevents them from acting on their suicidal impulses, then it will have been worthwhile, and being maligned by passive aggressive enablers committed to making the problem worse while congratulating themselves for being so virtuous, kind and understanding, will have been a small price to pay for that person to renain alive and not pass their pain onto every single friend, family & stranger who otherwise would have gone on to suffer due to thier death. I have higher order values than being liked by idiotic strangers committed to an illusory morality that requires they see me as an uncaring bitch, in order to see themselves as unimpeachably correct & righteous. If they need me to be a callous bitch in order that their fucking idiotic ideological illusions remain intact, that’s their problem not mine.

storyboard Prompt： Extremely rough, messy, dirty pencil storyboard. Like scribbled thumbnails drawn in under 10 seconds, crude gesture sketches, scratchy loose lines, barely recognizable shapes. Complete doodle-level roughness, even more casual and rough than neat sketches. Aspect ratio 21:9. Black and white only. Must NOT look like finished artwork. Do NOT draw clean line art. Exactly 12 panels arranged in a 4×3 grid, 4 columns × 3 rows. Each panel enclosed by a hastily drawn, uneven, casual rectangular border. Do NOT include any text, numbers, labels, or captions. Depict a young girl chasing butterflies in a garden. Consistency rules: Maintain physical and spatial consistency across all panels. The garden layout remains the same throughout: a simple backyard garden with a curved dirt path running diagonally from bottom left to upper right, a small wooden fence in the background, and three consistent flower beds (left, center-right, far back). The main butterfly type is always a small, simple oval-wing silhouette (no detailed patterns), appearing as loose scribbles. The girl remains the same character in all panels: a small child with short hair tied in a messy ponytail, wearing a loose dress and simple shoes. Her proportions stay consistent. Hands are simplified with maximum 2 fingers. Do NOT draw detailed anatomy. Motion must remain coherent across panels (no teleporting, no sudden layout changes). Panel 1 (Hook): Extreme close-up rough scribble of a butterfly fluttering out of a flower cluster in the foreground, with chaotic motion lines. The girl’s hand reaches in from the edge, slightly out of focus, trying to catch it. Panel 2: Wider view of the garden. The girl notices the butterfly taking off from the left flower bed. Her body leans forward, starting to run along the curved path. Panel 3: The girl begins chasing the butterfly along the dirt path. The butterfly is slightly ahead, hovering low above the path. Motion lines show quick movement. Panel 4: The butterfly darts toward the center-right flower bed. The girl reaches forward with one arm, slightly off balance, feet mid-step. Panel 5: The girl runs deeper into the garden. The butterfly rises higher, now above the center flower bed. The wooden fence becomes more visible in the background. Panel 6: The girl jumps slightly trying to reach the butterfly. The butterfly flutters just out of reach, moving toward the far back flower bed. Strong scribbled motion lines emphasize upward movement. Panel 7: The girl lands and pivots direction, now running diagonally toward the back of the garden. The butterfly is now small and farther away near the fence line. Consistent garden layout remains unchanged. Panel 8: The girl reaches the far back flower bed. She slows down, looking upward. The butterfly hovers above a cluster of tall flowers near the fence. Panel 9: The girl crouches slightly, trying to approach gently. The butterfly descends toward the flowers, wings barely suggested by rough lines. Panel 10: The butterfly briefly lands on a flower. The girl freezes in place, hands lowered, observing closely. Panel 11: The butterfly lifts off again suddenly. The girl reaches up carefully with one hand, standing on tiptoe, trying not to scare it. Panel 12 (End): The girl stands still, slightly smiling, watching the butterfly fly upward and away above the garden fence. Calm ending, with loose scribbled motion fading into empty sky. Overall: Pure rough scribbled thumbnails. Extremely casual gesture drawings, no detail, no shading, no color, no text. Maintain consistent garden geography, consistent character design, and continuous spatial logic across all panels. Make the aspect ratio 4:3 🌟video prompt： Please use the attached storyboard as a reference for composition and shot sequence. Based on this, recreate a scene of a young girl chasing butterflies in a garden as an extremely rough, messy, dirty pencil storyboard animation. The entire output should feel like scribbled thumbnails drawn in under 10 seconds per frame, crude gesture sketches, scratchy loose lines, barely recognizable shapes. It must look like raw pre-visualization doodles, not finished illustration or animation. Style: Pure rough storyboard thumbnails, black and white only. Extremely casual hand-drawn pencil scribbles, broken lines, uneven strokes, inconsistent line weight, incomplete shapes. No shading, no color, no rendering. No polished animation look. No cinematic beauty pass. Maintain a raw, unfinished ideation board aesthetic throughout the entire sequence. From start to finish, maintain the same rough sketch language and do NOT upgrade quality in later shots. Absolutely no live action. Absolutely no photorealistic rendering. Absolutely no 3D. **Consistency rules (must remain stable across all shots):** * Same backyard garden layout across all panels: a curved dirt path runs diagonally from bottom left to upper right, a small wooden fence in the background, and three consistent flower beds (left, center-right, far back). * Butterfly remains a simple oval-wing scribble shape in all panels, with no pattern or detail. * The girl remains identical in all panels: small child, short messy ponytail implied with scribbles, loose dress shape, simple shoes, simplified hands with max two fingers. * Garden geometry must remain stable (no shifting fence, no teleporting flower beds). * Motion must be continuous and physically coherent (no sudden jumps in position). * All elements must stay minimal doodles; do NOT refine or clean up in later panels. 15 seconds, following the sequence of 12 shots below in order: Panel 1 (Hook): Extreme close-up scribble of a butterfly emerging from a flower cluster, chaotic motion lines. A child’s hand enters frame reaching in from the edge, slightly out of focus. Panel 2: Wider garden view. The girl notices the butterfly taking off from the left flower bed. Her body leans forward, preparing to run along the curved path. Panel 3: The girl starts running along the dirt path. The butterfly floats slightly ahead, low above the ground, indicated by loose motion strokes. Panel 4: The butterfly darts toward the center-right flower bed. The girl reaches forward mid-step, off balance, chasing it. Panel 5: The girl runs deeper into the garden. The butterfly rises above the center flower bed. The wooden fence becomes more visible in the background scribble. Panel 6: The girl jumps slightly, trying to catch the butterfly. The butterfly moves upward toward the far back flower bed, emphasized with strong upward scribbles. Panel 7: The girl lands and pivots direction, now running diagonally toward the back fence. The butterfly appears smaller in the distance. Panel 8: The girl reaches the far back flower bed and slows down, looking upward. The butterfly hovers above tall flowers near the fence. Panel 9: The girl crouches slightly, trying to approach gently. The butterfly descends toward the flowers. Panel 10: The butterfly briefly lands on a flower. The girl freezes, hands lowered, watching carefully. Panel 11: The butterfly lifts off again. The girl reaches up carefully on tiptoe with one hand, trying not to scare it. Panel 12 (End): The girl stands still, slightly smiling, watching the butterfly fly upward above the fence. Calm ending, motion fading into empty sky scribbles. Camera & Motion: Motion should be implied only through rough sketch variations between frames. No smooth animation feel. No cinematic camera movement—only storyboard progression with inconsistent rough perspective shifts. Any sense of zoom or angle change must be represented crudely, not smoothly. No text. No captions. No subtitles. No logos. No color. No shading refinement. Sound: Only implied natural garden ambience (wind, rustling flowers, footsteps), suggested visually through motion scribbles rather than explicit detail.

Loneliness is one of the strongest predictors of suicidal ideation among men. Men please always speak up even when no one is listening just speak out.

Informative New ideation