#Yoga Way- Individualisation, Holism and Vitality. Growth begins from within. The strongest individuals and organisations don’t succeed by simply following others. They discover their uniqueness, understand the bigger picture, and build strength through continuous learning and capability. This is why principles inspired by Yoga are powerful beyond the physical practice- they cultivate awareness, balance, focus, and resilience. In a world of constant change, lasting success comes when inner clarity meets purposeful action. While learning’s and lessons from Yoga are immortal and for everyday practice, they are more to be inculcated when #InternationalYogaDay is around the corner (21st June ) and is eagerly awaited world over.

Here's what I see Daisy. England promotes one-size-fits-all and beleives is does it well. Here in Scotland in principle individualisation is promoted but in practice it is not done well. I think that ed tech and help with those outside the middle. Catch-up and advanced progress.

Coûts de R&D très élevés, TT hyper compliqués à fabriquer, individualisation du TT : 1 patient => 1 TT unique dédié => une chaîne de fabrication spécifique, logistique lourde, hospit longue t surveillance med complexe, petit nombre de patients donc coûts fixes élevés

Discours n*3 de #Saint #Germain Page 26 et 27 Invocation : Ô Toi Présence Infinie, interpénétrant tout ! Par le Pouvoir de Ta Radiation qui surgit dans l’atmosphère de la Terre, nous Te louons et Te remercions, car l’Amour, la Sagesse et le Pouvoir du Christ qui déferlent sur l’humanité élèvent la conscience des êtres au-dessus de l’égoïsme de l’activité du moi extérieur ! Nous Te louons et Te remercions de nous avoir donné la conscience de Ta Puissante, Active Présence en tout temps. Par l’acceptation consciente de Ta Réalité, Tu charges notre âme et notre corps de Ta pure Présence, à jamais ! Discours : Je vous salue au Nom du glorieux Chœur des Maîtres Ascensionnés ! C’est à partir de la Radiation de la Ceinture Électronique que I AM - Je projette cette Instruction. Au Cœur de la Cité d’Or, les Rayons jumelés, sur lesquels la Lumière et le Son sont dirigés, ont leur point de départ . Le temps est venu où tous doivent devenir conscients des grandes Ceintures ou Cercles Électroniques qui entourent toutes les manifestations depuis la Divinité jusqu’à l’individu. La personne qui a une compréhension suffisante du Principe actif du Soi divin, peut, quoique dans une moindre mesure, s’entourer d’une Ceinture ou Cercle Électronique qu’il peut qualifier positivement à sa guise. Ceux qui en effet, avec Sagesse, formeront ce Cercle en le qualifiant avec la Puissance et l’Amour de Dieu, pourront circuler dans le monde sans être touchés par les énergies négatives. Et c’est maintenant la période cosmique où tous ceux qui ont atteint un certain degré de compréhension doivent créer et employer ce merveilleux Cercle Electronique. En fait, toute création, qui est une action de l’Etre conscient, est naturellement entourée par un Cercle de pure Force Electronique, mais dans une large mesure, cette force n’est pas contrôlée, et alors elle se dissipe. En créant consciemment ce Puissant Anneau de Pure Force Electronique, on peut arrêter toute perte dans la génération de l’Essence illimitée, et L’accumuler en vue d’un emploi sous direction consciente. Après avoir pratiqué pendant quelques mois cette Activité créatrice du Cercle Électronique, il faut prudemment ne jamais libérer ou diriger cette Force que par Amour divin. Au début de son individualisation, l’être humain était naturellement enveloppé dans ce Tube magique, mais par la chute progressive de la conscience, des fissures se sont produites. La Force Electronique s’est dissipée et le Cercle a presque complètement disparu. Ce n’était pas un Cercle consciemment constitué par l’individu. Il en était naturellement enveloppé. A présent, il est indispensable que les Étudiants de la Lumière reforment autour d’eux-mêmes, consciemment, cette Ceinture Électronique, visualisant ce Tube parfait, sans interruption ni fissure. De cette manière, il est possible de pénétrer consciemment dans le Cercle Electronique de la Divinité, d’y puiser à la Sagesse, à l’Amour, et à la Lumière illimités, et d’apprendre l’application de Lois simples qui gouvernent tout Pouvoir Créateur. Si d’une part il est recommandé à l’Etudiant de s’adresser toujours et de ne jamais oublier son propre Soi divin qui est l’auteur de son individualisation, d’autre part, il est certain qu’aucune Réalisation n’a jamais été faite sans l’Assistance de ceux qui sont plus avancés. Étant donné qu’il n’y a qu’Un Dieu et une Présence Active et toute Puissante, celui qui est plus avancé ne représente qu’une part plus grande du Soi divin en Action. Ceci étant bien admis qu’il est facile de sentir : “I AM, Je Suis ici et I AM, Je Suis là !” car il n’y a que l’Unique Soi divin partout. Si l’Etudiant a compris une fois pour toutes que le Chœur des Maîtres Ascensionnés ne constitue que la part réalisée de sa propre Conscience divine, il gagnera le sentiment de l’ampleur et de certitude de toutes les possibilités dont il peut disposer. […] 💫Saint Germain 💜

In the session 'Individualisation Requires Communication' we heard that HCP's feel time constraints and the concern of overloading patients are some of the barriers to shared-decision making being widely implemented.

#EHA2026 starts today with the session "Individualisation requieres communications". Shared-decision making should be an important part of this process #SDM #PatientAdvocacy

The Bajaj Auto Managing Director said principles such as individualisation, holism and vitality helped shape the company’s approach to innovation and capability building as it expanded into a global exporter serving 108 countries. share.google/OuOj5LXVgP7QXic…

That's not unconditioned quiddity. Al mahiyyah bila shart is the concept abstracted from individualisation, not "in itself". Quiddity in itself is just the quiddity.

Proliferation of absolutely atrocious singer-songwriter twee music crap ala gimps with ukuleles or Sheeran is symptomatic of hyper-individualisation and the Century of the Self.

PeerVoice - Individualisation Requires Communication: Working With Our Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) to Optimise Treatment Outcomes cme.peervoice.com/505205745_…

..you can be free by individualisation...no matter what..reputation not necessarily ruined..keep on

Le développement personnel est la marque de l’hyper individualisation, où le lecteur croit être le seul responsable de son malheur occultant les responsabilités sociales et politiques sur le mal être psychologique des gens

The End of Realitivistic Rage, Two Tier Tolerance, & Traditional Political Lines The reign of radical globalists must end. There is no soft or hard Left, Centre, or Right in politics. There's National Sovereignty & there's Globalism. Masoumeh Jafri Manojan, aka Masuma Sohrabi, was brutally murdered on the outskirts of Clifden. There was no “silence”. Ali Sohrabi, aged 35, of no fixed abode, was quickly identified in connection with the killing. You cannot demand collective moral introspection when the perpetrator fits your preferred narrative, then demand strict individualisation when he does not. The Ashling Murphy case is the perfect example of this moral asymmetry. Murdered in broad daylight in Tullamore, stabbed repeatedly in the neck, with such ferocity it approached decapitation. A “national conversation” about Irish male attitudes to women was demanded and raged for two weeks. Then Jozef Puska, a Slovak national living in Ireland, was convicted of her murder and sentenced to life. Multiple members of his family were later prosecuted for obstructing justice. No equivalent “national conversation” followed, because the NGO and political interpretation changed once the perpetrator turned out to be a migrant. Once a man is pinned down, wounded, and defenceless, there is no serious question of proportionality. Not biography. Not tribal sorting. Not whether another terrible murder happened somewhere else. Not whether someone online can assemble a collage of unrelated tragedies and call it balance. You cite previous convictions as though that answers the central question. It does not. Prior convictions may be relevant in court under strict evidential rules. They are not an online permission slip to imply that a victim authored his own mutilation. Your response evades. You cannot use one victim in another country to dilute another, or demand that nobody speak about one incident unless they first recite every other tragedy in the moral archive. What force, exactly, do you believe remains proportionate when a man is already pinned, wounded, and defenceless, and when the attacker has no knowledge of his record? If your answer is “but he had a record”, then you are not discussing self-defence. You are discussing retrospective moral disposal of the victim. If your answer is “but people were silent about other cases”, then you are not discussing justice. You are also relying on falsehood and hyperbole. If your answer is “but riots are wrong”, that is what occurs when again and again a demographic is branded, humiliated, abused, attacked, sidelined, beaten by those who are supposed to protect, have their speech curtailed, are attacked when they exercise their right to public assembly while jihadi flags and death to all whites parades are protected by the state. Nelson Mandela rioted. What say you about that? Your whataboutisms do not erase the attack, and it does not prevent people from asking lawful questions about public safety, border control, state competence, offender management, and the duty of government to protect the public. The state bears grave responsibility when unvetted individuals, known offenders, or dangerous people are placed into communities without consent, scrutiny, or disclosure, and then go on to harm the public. That is not collective blame. It is a question of duty of care. Hundreds of communities have been forced to absorb this with no consultation. Appeals to government are ignored, the outspoken are branded, dismissed, or pathologised. Yet when appalling crimes occur, the same political class insists that nobody may connect policy, risk, consequence, and accountability. The serious position is individual responsibility, equal law, public safety, and state accountability. You have not rebutted that. You have tried and failed to bury one incident under a pile of corpses, 75% of which are the result of the same problem! FYI: CPS state "convictions do not determine guilt in a new case"

This is not standing in the light. It is an indictment of both morals and reason. Your collage rather undermines the point you think you are making. Masoumeh Jafri Manojan, also known as Masuma Sohrabi, was brutally murdered on the outskirts of Clifden. There was no “silence”. Ali Sohrabi, aged 35, of no fixed abode, was quickly identified in connection with the killing. You cannot demand collective moral introspection when the perpetrator fits your preferred narrative, then demand strict individualisation when he does not. The Ashling Murphy case is the perfect example of this moral asymmetry. A young woman was murdered in broad daylight while exercising along the canal in Tullamore. Ashling was stabbed repeatedly in the neck, with such ferocity that the attack approached decapitation. A “national conversation” about Irish male attitudes to women was demanded and raged for two weeks. Then Jozef Puska, a Slovak national living in Ireland, was convicted of her murder and sentenced to life. Multiple members of his family were later prosecuted for obstructing justice. No equivalent “national conversation” followed, because the NGO and political interpretation changed once the perpetrator turned out to be a migrant. Once a man is pinned down, wounded, and defenceless, there is no serious question of proportionality. Not biography. Not tribal sorting. Not whether another terrible murder happened somewhere else. Not whether someone online can assemble a collage of unrelated tragedies and call it balance. You cite previous convictions as though that answers the central question. It does not. Prior convictions may be relevant in court under strict evidential rules. They are not an online permission slip to imply that a victim authored his own mutilation. Your response evades. You cannot use one victim in another country to dilute another, or demand that nobody speak about one incident unless they first recite every other tragedy in the moral archive. What force, exactly, do you believe remains proportionate when a man is already pinned, wounded, and defenceless, and when the attacker has no knowledge of his record? If your answer is “but he had a record”, then you are not discussing self-defence. You are discussing retrospective moral disposal of the victim. If your answer is “but people were silent about other cases”, then you are not discussing justice. You are also relying on falsehood and hyperbole. If your answer is “but riots are wrong”, that is what occurs when again and again a demographic is branded, humiliated, abused, attacked, sidelined, beaten by those who are supposed to protect, have their speech curtailed, are attacked when they exercise their right to public assembly while jihadi flags and death to all whites parades are protected by the state. Nelson Mandela rooted. What say you about that? Your whataboutisms do not erase the attack, and it does not prevent people from asking lawful questions about public safety, border control, state competence, offender management, and the duty of government to protect the public. The state bears grave responsibility when unvetted individuals, known offenders, or dangerous people are placed into communities without consent, scrutiny, or disclosure, and then go on to harm the public. That is not collective blame. It is a question of duty of care. Hundreds of communities have been forced to absorb this with no consultation. Appeal to government are ignored, the outspoken are branded, dismissed, or pathologised. Yet when appalling crimes occur, the same political class insists that nobody may connect policy, risk, consequence, and accountability. The serious position is individual responsibility, equal law, public safety, and state accountability. You have not rebutted that. You have tried and failed to bury one incident under a pile of corpses, 75% of which are the result of the same problem! FYI: CPS state "convictions do not determine guilt in a new case"

On a des technologies de facilitation du quotidien qui nous ont rendu plus libres que toutes les générations nous précédent, aucune guerre, du savoir à profusion. Certes une certaine vacuité latente du fait de notre individualisation, mais elle se comble ailleurs. Courage.

The sports science community talks about individualisation constantly. "Train the athlete in front of you." Then uses population-level load thresholds derived from male university students. The gap between what we preach and what we measure in women's sport is embarrassing.

Les peines planchers, cela pourrait être une bonne idée. Cela laisse la place à une individualisation de la peine tout en assurant une sanction minimale pour des faits très graves.

The Lamborghini Urus SE enters a new dimension by MANSORY. Introducing the newly developed Softkit, created to redefine every detail. A complete individualisation program featuring exclusive exterior upgrades, bespoke interiors, 7 different 24-inch wheel designs, and performance increased up to 1,100 hp and 1,250 Nm. The evolution of the super SUV continues.

Maybe because white people don’t exist as a collective, that’s why. Your individualisation of PoCs is actually a deep way to protect their collectivism.