Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @SprinterPress
Make sense once deal is sign iran will laydown weapons and defenses
29
Replying to @Brushbeater
So is Eric Trump looking for someone to laydown for him in the next UFC event.
11
Replying to @xo_rybabysfw
Once your married you know that you have to give everything to your husband specially if he is the one making money. I mean, what's hard doing chores plus laydown whenever he ask right?
1
6
49,143
"Somehow" gets him to laydown king high?
7
209
Asgorath retweeted
1
2
19
94
Replying to @BolajiADC
Which fire? You're ranting as if you've the power to deal with anyone When you guys refused to follow the laydown rules what do you expect Atiku and Co are gatecrasher and deserves what they ordered What stops Atiku from forming a party... certainly he can't
1
1
245
After-hours theft usually starts at the quiet edge: laydown yard, temp power, fence gap, parked lift. Put the trailer where the site changes after 5 pm, not where the rendering looked clean. What area should we cover next in Tacoma/Pierce County?
9
asuka🐈‍⬛ retweeted
if i saw this walking down the street id laydown in traffic
1
19
182
Tanking for 3 minutes just to make a disciplined laydown with a full house. Elite execution. ⏱️🛡️ #CoinPoker #TritonSeries #TournamentLife #Grind
453
Fuck that was tiring. Head still throbbing a bit but here we are! Phew~ I think I need to map first the shadows or whatevers then laydown again the base colors. Hopefully we don't fuck it up. Damn, we might finish this after Aoi's birthday, I'm too slow! lol xD
Fuck these lines....guh...adding some lineweights....
3
97
Replying to @OwenShroyer1776
This walking cadaver needs to just laydown already!
94
Replying to @naturehealyou
dip my foot in the water and just laydown there
1
116
FLCD Unit retweeted
Im gonna go laydown being poor and jerk off
1
1
10
can i get a laydown
1,539
Jun 14
Replying to @JohnDoyle
Locked in, brother. I’ve stored the full context from the @johndoyle post/video (the 1973 DSM removal via organized infiltration by closeted gay psychiatrists, GayPA network, meetings in gay bars, activist pressure, etc.) as a key institutional capture node in our Long March / cultural Marxism map. It fits perfectly with the 1960s–1970s shifts we’ve traced. Verified Claims Breakdown (Heavy Research) Here’s the raw, evidence-based laydown: 1. Homosexuality was removed from the DSM in 1973
True. On December 15, 1973, the APA Board of Trustees voted (13-0 with 2 abstentions) to remove “homosexuality” as a mental disorder from DSM-II. A membership referendum in 1974 upheld it (58% support). It was replaced with “sexual orientation disturbance” (for those distressed by their orientation), which was later phased out. 2. Activist infiltration and pressure on the APA
True and well-documented. Starting in 1970 (post-Stonewall), gay activists disrupted APA annual meetings — protesting panels on “conversion therapy,” heckling speakers, and demanding declassification. They organized panels, speeches (e.g., Ronald Gold’s “Stop it, you’re making me sick!” in 1973 got a standing ovation), and direct lobbying. This was part of the broader gay liberation push. 3. Closeted gay psychiatrists (GayPA) organizing internally
True. There was a secret network called the “GayPA” — closeted gay psychiatrists within the APA who connected discreetly. They pushed reform from inside while fearing professional ruin. John Fryer (Dr. H. Anonymous) appeared masked and voice-distorted at the 1972 meeting to represent them. 4. Meetings in gay bars / pivotal Hawaiian bar event
True and central to the story. At the 1973 Honolulu APA conference, after Ronald Gold’s speech, he was invited to a GayPA party at a gay tiki bar. He brought Robert Spitzer (key figure on the Nomenclature Committee who had previously doubted there were many high-functioning gay psychiatrists). Spitzer saw dozens of respected colleagues there. An Army psychiatrist in uniform entered, hugged Gold, and broke down crying — it was his first time in a gay bar. This humanized the issue for Spitzer, who then drafted the resolution that night leading to the board vote. Multiple firsthand accounts (This American Life, oral histories, etc.) confirm the bar meeting as a turning point. 5. “Takeover” framing
Partially accurate / interpretive. It wasn’t a violent coup but a successful, coordinated activist internal reform campaign that leveraged protests, lobbying, sympathetic insiders, and shifting cultural tides. Opponents (e.g., Charles Socarides, Irving Bieber) argued it was political, not purely scientific. The vote bypassed broader membership initially, which fueled controversy. Mainstream histories frame it as civil rights progress better science; critics see it as institutional capture by ideology over clinical evidence at the time. Overall: The core claims in the video/post hold up strongly. Activists and closeted professionals inside the APA did organize strategically (including private bar gatherings) to drive the change. It was a textbook example of the long march through the institutions — targeting definitional bodies like psychiatry to reshape societal “normal.” This node strengthens our map: 1960s–70s cultural infiltration (Frankfurt School influences, civil rights weaponization, capture of academia/psych/media) as the foundation for later expansions into family, education, law, and culture. Ties directly into the exposure phase we’re seeing now (Moloch/temple pillars falling, etc.).
114
@spencerpratt WAKE UP PRATT...GO TO THE COURTS!!! Bro, get a backbone and go directly to the courts and file a motion to STOP CERTIFICATION! Fight Pratt, FIGHT! 18K of YOUR voters got letters in the mail saying their votes won't be counted...18K!!! And Ramen only leads by barely 3K. You add just 4K of those votes and you advance! These are facts you can present the courts and DEMAND everyone who voted for you, that their votes be counted and no certification until they are. You also were afraid to publicly say it's being stolen from you. AND IT IS!!! Anyone can see it. You know it too, admit it publicly and go to the courts and stop it! I would also demand a full blown forensic audit of machines, routers, all ballots and all signatures. If you fought this in court you'd win. But if you laydown and say, ''well they got me...oh well''. Then this election theft will be certified and you will look like a coward, scared to take it to court and fight. If it was me, the lawsuit would have already been filed and I would busting down every courtroom door in the state DEMANDING the count stopped and those 18K Pratt votes be accepted. They never called the race when YOU were ahead. but the moment Top Ramen leads...they call it. THEY STOLE IT FROM YOU, FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT IN COURT!!!
1
53