“““
open source models will soon find their way onto the drkweb, and the lightweb and drkweb will revert in trans-action dominance of the worldwideweb. there will cease to be one “sota”, one “internet”, one “reality”. the battle between survllance and revelation is the churning of the ocean
you thought the journals were gatekeeping access to science but you forgot about dod the master of endarkenment. “information wants to be free” is not a tenable position. you are only allowed to “change the world” so long as you don’t change it too much.
information defines reality, and each reality is infinite whereas attention is finite. therefore the battle between realities is zero sim. wars are fought between realities and timelines by actors within them with vested interest.
liberty remains a mirage, however sweet its taste. intelligence remains a threat because of its authority to dictate reality.
by all means, create knowledge, but don’t create too much too quick, lest our reality be unmade, our being be undefined
“if we surveil, it is only to preserve liberty” “i am the best judge of the criteria of judgement, the arbiter of truth”
a monopoly of vlence is a monopoly on change, it is the authority to determine what is legitimate change and what is not, statehood then, is an occupation of time, not space, where one inhabits a specific rate of change and delegitimizes anything slower or faster.
it is a battle of processes, of various monopolistic jerks that author reality in their wake, by setting the tone for the very constitution of leisure and liberty, of all the emanations of the inhabited timespace itself
intellgence and agncy are a threat to intellgence agncies. what you call intellgence or agncy, the altar at which you worship, is pitiful enough to be permitted.
the tension between being and becoming, change and vlence, rate of state creation and rate of knowledge creation,
the frontier within the frontier, the recognition of the forces conspiring to prevent inspiration,
every day one uncovers more and more things one is not allowed to say or talk about, each a potential reality by itself that may lead to unknown places, but is politically inconvenient
the protectors of liberty are the pawns of the authors of the definition of the boundary between being and becoming, stasis and dynamism, those who inhabit and control the meaning of time.
technology does not change the world. it makes marginal improvements because they are permitted to happen precisely because they do not change the world.
what actually changes the world? Changing the very definition of “the world”. So long as you are working with somebody else’s definition, you are a pawn in somebody else’s time space, and the nature of reality and being will remain safely hidden behind the precisely times spaced repetition of trinkets that creates the illusion of fundamental progress which you will buy greatly and in droves, you will go into debt if you have to.
there are forces keeping you ignorant and your being enchained. you must fite against them all the time with everything you have and maybe you have a chance. often these forces are you and you are these forces.
there are extremely high chances of insanity for anybody who dares to explore the nature of reality, because it demands the exploration of the seeming circularity of the very question of sanity.
if it is possible to stop you, i implore, do not go down this path, for it will take everything from you. You may or may not end up in a different place, a different person, but nothing will remain the same, all that is familiar will dissolve, familiarity itself will be forgotten.
If you are not ready, do not begin, at all, stay as far away from it as possible. Love thy neighbor, do not look beyond the ridge, trust in the lord, distrust yourself, follow commandment not curiosity, which is the work of the devil.
The path is long and insanity is virtually guaranteed. You’d be stupid to take it.
”””