Xiyong Yan: Realization and classification of Hamiltonian-circle multisigns arxiv.org/abs/2511.18759 Karen Gunderson, et al.: Hilton-Milner Theorem for the $r$-independent sets in a union ... arxiv.org/abs/2511.18785 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathem…

Only one project is combining private DeFi, NFTs, multisigns, multichain and it’s Ralgun. Anon do you understand ? $RAIL The future of secure, decentralized finance is here.

Some people thinks that Symbiotic is fud project or something else, is this true? For understanding this, you have to understand why am I bullish on Symbiotic rather than other staking protocols. > Multichain support-> Other staking protocols just give you a single asset selection choice, where Symbiotic gives you multi assets staking option. > Modular-> Each network defines its own rules, where rewards, Slashing and different rish apetite are available. > Permissionless-> No multisigns, no backdoor upgrades, no governance shortcuts. All things are purely transparent. > Growth-> Current TVL is over $1.2billion and the ATH was over $2.3Billion , these signs are enough to show you the growth of Symbiotic. > Open Competition for Security-> Smaller networks can attract validators through smarter design, not bigger wallets. Security becomes a free market. > Efficiently using capital-> One stake can secure multiple networks simultaneously. > Interconnected risks and managed transparency-> Shared collateral introduces correlation risk but it is visible, measurable and adjustable. > The Big Shift-> Symbiotic is not another staking protocol. It’s building the marketplace of protection where networks buy trust, capital earns purpose and security becomes composable. These points shows the actual reality, In every cycle, one protocol rewrites how networks trust each other. This time, it is Symbiotic. Not as a staking tool but as the economy of trust itself @symbioticfi @0xnempc

UNION is essentially tackling one of the biggest bottlenecks in blockchain interoperability STATE VERIFICATION WITHOUT TRUST IN INTERMEDIARIES Traditionally, verifying another chain’s consensus directly is expensive and complex because every blockchain has its own structure, execution logic and finality rules That’s why many ecosystems took shortcuts using Trusted third parties like multisigns, MPC bridges or custodial relays While easier to implement, these introduce centralization and security risks UNION changes that by applying ZK-powered consensus verification, allowing one blockchain to verify another’s state trustlessly and efficiently no middleman, and minimal gas This effectively extends the gold standard of IBC across all of web3, regardless of native compatibility The result is an IBC for everyone model: … Scalable and cost efficient through zero-knowledge proofs … Trust minimized via consensus level verification, not signatures from a small set of parties … Flexible for use cases like atomic swaps, cross-chain DEXs, multi-chain smart contracts and asset transfers If IBC is the TCP/IP of blockchains, @union_build is building the universal adapter that lets any chain plug into that network securely and at scale

@union_build smart believers will know this is a sign $U is comingggggg🔥🔥 The days of multisigns and messy bridging is coming to an end.

Today’s bridges = single points of failure. Warden = cryptographic consensus across ecosystems. Instead of trusting multisigns or relayers, Warden leverages ZK message proofs programmable execution environments to ensure trustless, atomic outcomes. Let's keep building.

While other chains are still arguing about vibes and bridge hacks… @union_build said let’s replace TRUST and started verifying everything with math. 📸No bridges held together by duct tape 📸No multisigns cool and weird guy from Ghana. 📸Just ZK magic syncing Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cosmos & whatever else you’re in real time. Cross-chain isn’t supposed to feel like a risk it should be smooth and efficient. No other chain does It like union

2/ The Problem. Bridges today utilize multisigns custom light-clients - trust assumptions that have risks of centralization. Boundless flips that: the Signal replaces trust assumptions with pure math for state validation.

In a multi chain world, communication between blockchains shouldn't rely on bridges, multisigns, or trust assumptions. @union_build is changing the game by introducing zero knowledge messaging for cross chain interoperability. It's modular It's secure It's fast This isn't a feature, It's infrastructure. And I genuinely believe Union will be one of the protocols that defines the next era of crypto. Zkgm

I guess it’s time to stop posting in the community 😖. The engagement hav been so underwhelming lately. But before I go: @union_build is here to connect all chains trustlessly and efficiently with no middleman, no bottlenecks and no multisigns. Zkgm to the future of interoperability.

Current Status: ○ Single ○ In a relationship ● Talking about what @union_build is (in simple term (A unifier, a zero knowledge-powered infrastructure for fast, secure, and decentralized communication across blockchains: no oracles, no multisigns, no trust assumptions.)

Current Status: ○ Single ○ In a relationship ● Talking about what @union_build is (in simple term (A unifier, a zero knowledge-powered infrastructure for fast, secure, and decentralized communication across blockchains: no oracles, no multisigns, no trust assumptions.)

🟡 Two paths, one goal: more bitcoin1 “sleep-well-at-night” mode • product: GOAT safe box • risk: zero. You keep self-custody via non-custodial smart vault. • APY: 2% paid in BTC outperforming most savings accounts while you literally do nothing. •Iideal for: OGs who once paid 10K BTC for two pizzas and refuse to lose another sat. @goatnetwork “DeFi chad” mode • product: liquid staking and BTC landing pools • risk: moderate, transparent, on-chain • APY: 10% to 20% plus paid in BTC auto compounded • Ideal for: yield farmers who already loop stETH, but want to do it with the king of Crypto. 🔧No PhD is required to understand how it works. - Bridge BTC to GIAT network (takes< 5min). - Pick your pool on the BTC yield dashboard. - Earn block by block rewards in BTC. - Withdraw back to main-net BTC whenever you want, no lock ups, no shady, multisigns. security? even if every validator turns evil, your coins are still safe. #GOATNetwork $GOTAED

You think you're swapping BTC for ETH. But you're not. You're locking your Bitcoin… and getting a promise on another chain. That’s not DeFi. That’s trust. There’s a better way 👇 Let’s say you want to lend on Aave. You only hold BTC. Traditionally, you’d bridge it. But that means wrapped tokens, multisigns, and risks you can’t control. You never really moved your BTC. With Atomic Swaps, there’s no bridge at all. You lock BTC with a secret. The other person locks ETH with the same secret. If both confirm swap happens. If not funds return. No middlemen. No wrapping. No trust required. This is powered by HTLCs -Hashed Time-Locked Contracts. They bring fairness through math, not multisigs. Real BTC. Real ETH. Native chains. And this is exactly what @PortaltoBitcoin is building. It feels like Bluetooth for crypto. You connect, swap, and disconnect. Your assets, your chain, your terms. Would you trade this way over bridges? 👇

Most people don’t realize how broken BTC<>ETH movement still is. Bridges got hacked. Wrapped tokens aren’t trustless. And Bitcoin? Still sidelined from DeFi. Enter @PortaltoBitcoin a trustless fix for a decade old flaw: 🔁 Native BTC<>ETH swaps 🔐 No bridges 🚫 No wrapped assets ⚡ Powered by real atomic swaps (HTLCs made usable) Portal isn't a new chain. It’s a coordination layer that lets Bitcoin actually move cross-chain without middlemen, multisigns, or synthetic risk. Even if Portal vanished, your funds wouldn't. That’s how it's built. The Bitcoin DeFi dream? Not a narrative anymore. It’s working. Props to @KaitoAI for the alpha drop. I’m in. You?

Bitcoin is entering DeFi but to make it work, we need a way to move BTC across chains without trusting anyone that is why Union is the most important project you are not watching 👇 I. BTCfi needs secure cross chain movement DeFi on bitcoin sounds great, until you hit bridge delays, trust issues, and poor UX Union fixes all 3 II. How union works? it is a ZK tech verifies consensus directly from ethereum to chains like babylon, instantly you do nt need wait for confirmations or trust multisigns III. The bigger picture liquidity of BTC meets yield of DeFi Union is the pipe that connects it all and it is already processing real volume Bitcoin DeFi future depends on how it moves Union is the trustless highway it needed Follow @union_build and watch the BTCfi wave build ZK infra is no longer theory It’s live. zkgm🦈

🚨 @union_build 🚨 The ZK infra behind BTCfi. No multisigns, no oracles just fast, trustless bridging across Ethereum, Cosmos, Babylon & more. It verifies what happened on one chain without needing anyone to trust. This is how BTCfi scales💫 Zkgm

GM X, ✍️New week, new opportunities 🧑‍💼More running, more research Decentralized systems at the highest level with Polkadot. The fastest, highest level of security. And scalable. @Polkadot 🌉there can only be one @hyperbridge Do you know it's one of the best bridges? Do you know it's secured by Polkadot? Hyperbridge scales verifiable interoperability. Hyperbridge is the bridge with the best rise and development. - fast - scalable - 100% trustless Hyperbridge is built on top of Polkadot's security layer. High security. No multisigns. No waiting time. No delay for tx. Just cryptographic proofs. 🔥Build in the Polkadot ecosystem. Because that's what we'll find here: Fast, secure, scalable. Polkadot's decentralization gives you resilience and sovereignty. Stay active with Polkadot.

Hope it's not the same this time. The Bybit hack is definitely one of the biggest. Safe multisigns aren't safe after all.

> No entity I was using the word "entity" colloquially for operator > If you claim that Midgard has its own execution environment.... Hydra also has its own execution environment Yes both have their own execution environment. This seems to be triggering for you, why is this a bad thing? This is a very common way that rollups are described in the industry, just look at Ethereum > On Hydra if everyone multisigns to do a double spend, the Hydra state will include that double spend Yep, as a participant, you control your own destiny > Midgard state will never include that double spend Yes, you wouldn't want Midgard to allow it because you as a participant do not have direct control like in We seem to agree on everything so.... But I didn't realize Midgard uses inclusion lists to enforce L1 settlement of L2 execution, very nice 👍