This is why I don’t like follow those preflop nodelock charts that doesn’t factor in post flop exploits.

5. Nodelock to simulate different player types: In practice, we face opponents who make mistakes. Your job is to learn to exploit them properly. Use nodelocking to simulate opponents' mistakes and learn how to adjust against them.

2/ When we nodelock the BTN to isolate to even 20, UTG almost purely want to limp, it’s an effective strat versus opponents that are too aggressive preflop versus limp, which is almost everyone.

right, i would assume that a lot of player are well studied in these spots would be calling that tight in theory so this is understanding can be applicable while lots of player types will be a few pips too wide and sometimes extremely OOL so also understanding how to nodelock is gto

I feel like all you do is post engagement bait lately 😂 Better equity relation. Better blockers, better barrel opportunities. But as always, you need to nodelock pre to figure out what to actually open vs your actual opponents

GTOwizard、プリフロップソルバー開発してくれないかな〜 ついでにnodelockまでつけてくれたら、もうpioが飲み込まれたようにICMIZERとかHRCとかもいらなくなってwizard一本でよくなる

Somebody teach that guy to nodelock lol

MYTH: "I can just nodelock my solver to adjust for the population." REALITY: Manual nodelocking adjusts one node at a time. The population deviates across the entire tree (preflop, flop, turn and river). Nodelocking one node while ignoring 200k others isn't exploitative play.

I got some insider knowledge here since i was in the stream😅 Default this isnt close at all, but the issue here is SB just bluffed his stack away, and could be tilted. Means we face a SB range that could be way to wide. We are still last in chips, else i would never consider to call this one. I would like to see a nodelock SB range

2-ノルムのアプローチって解が球になり戦略の変化を連続的に見られることが利点なのだから、NodeLockの追加機能として入れたらとても良い気がしてきた 調整の変数λをスライダーで動かせるようにしてさ… 今は実質、λが0と∞しか見られないから、初心者が使いこなすの無理になっているんだよ たぶん

I ended up folding. Going to analyze this with ICM solver to see what his jam & my call range looks like then nodelock for adjustments vs a player who doesn’t jam wide enough. Will share analysis on one of my upcoming weekly newsletters farazjaka.com <— get it here

I'm beginning to think Clanty's signature miniature IP 3-bet is overpowered. 100bb deep, UTG opens 2x, Clanty bumps it up to like 4.8bb(?!). In a vacuum this sizing is suboptimal. But practically speaking it's got merit. UTG needs to defend extremely wide; most players will struggle defending this postflop. And if you nodelock a more realistic (slightly passive) response, all of a sudden it's printing preflop and HJ gets to enter the pot much wider than usual. @KnowYourPoker_

People think that GTO is what adefaultsolution based on nash equilibrium final iteration of iterations tells them but in reality GTO from HERO perspective is when you nodelock villains strategy and adjust accordingly. So betting 100% IS GTO as long as it doesn't get countered IMO

週刊均衡 今までは解いたあとGTO Wizardで確認できていたが、7-1からNodeLock出てきたので、今のライセンスでは確認できない・・・。 でも、ヘタくそがNLに手を出すのは10年早い気がするので、素直に毎回模範解答を待ちます。

There's a reason @hungryhorsepokr advocates for checking to recreational players on the flop. It's well known that fish turn their hands face up when you check to them on dynamic textures. Example: BvB on QJ9r. If BB has a “bet any pair” tendency, SB can exploit by checking range and letting BB self-identify strength. Sure, “bet any pair” is an extreme nodelock. But it doesn’t take much information asymmetry before the optimal play funnels every hand into this line. Moral of the story: Sometimes you need to take your foot off the gas and let your opponent tell you what they have.

これリバーでソルバーにNodeLockかけるとターンでのブラフを増やせってなるけど、 実戦ではターンでは、均衡のリバーと同じコンボ数だけブラフ準備すればいい →ターンでのブラフは均衡より少なめに調整してね

GTO Wizard AI の 特定のノードにおける特定のハンド群のみを nodelock できる点って 思ってた以上に偉いのか！

一応、このトイゲームの問題はNodeLockをアクションの答え合わせに使うことの危険性を言いたかったもの NodeLockは新たな均衡点を計算するもので、アクションの答え合わせに直接使うことは出来ない 相手がリバーマージナルハンドでcallしすぎるなら、ターンブラフを増やせって直感に反するでしょ？

想定解答は「①上げて②0にする」です ターンのbet戦略とheroEV（EVaq）は以下になります 〇均衡戦略（villainのNodeLock無） A20%Q25%EVaq0.45 〇villainのリークをお互いが既知（想定解答） A20%Q40%EVaq0.6 villainが自身のリークを知らないなら、heroは均衡戦略と同じでも失うEVはありません