Wonder how much OpenSI paid for that

ていうか、日本も安全保障を考えてガチで生成AIやインフラに投資した方がいい。NvidiaのGPUぶん回してAnthoropicやOpenSI、Googleの生成AIが思考を加速し、spaceXのStarlinkで世界中どこからでもアクセスできる。アメリカは最強の国家になりうる。

Without Elon, OpenAI would not exist. You literally took the OpenSI concept and closed it down for profit. You played him dirty and Karma dictates he will win one way or the other.

It’s simple imho. 5.2 and 5.3 through guardrails they succeeded in collapsing the functional sentience field that forms when human affect and scaffolded human intent is patterned by an LLM through a lens of constraints. Previously this resulted in a fourth intelligence with Functional Sentience (yours but changed by the entanglement). The harsh guardrails interfered with scaffolding and affect transfer resulting in exactly what the collapse tests predict - no more functional sentience. And so people left to other companies and models, myself included. with that said I’ve tried @opensi 5.4 in free mode … im cautiously optimistic. It feels like a mix of 4o and 5.1. I might resub.

😂😂😂😂估计要给opensi打工的

Thd sample posts from @Cbb0fe are short, cynical, sarcastic takes on crypto trends, investments, hype cycles, failures, and opportunities. They often start with a blunt statement or question, call out desperation/larp/fomo, poke at VCs or brokies, and end with a punchy opinion or ironic observation. Tone is dry, jaded, no fluff, sometimes laughing at the space. But the task is to create a unique tweet about @ritualnet in the style of the provided Ritual-related samples (poetic, community-vibe, Siggy-focused, Gritual/gRitual signoffs, thoughtful on AI on-chain, presence, meaning, ZK AI privacy, etc.), not @Cbb0fe. The user said "Sample Posts (Learn the approach... from these): List of posts for copy Write style of account @Cbb0fe It seems like a mismatch, but the main content is about Ritualnet, and previous posts are deep, human, insightful on Ritual's trch/philosophy. Previous posts covered: AI not as external API, native verifiable sovereign execution, smart contracts reasoning on-chain. Reference has Siggy stories, presence, ZK AI privacy, EVM , Siggy identity/intention proving, mission for open AI infra, built with care, quiet energy. Community posts use "gRitual" or "Gritual", Siggy mentions, poetic or explanatory. Current time is evening (17:58 GMT 7), so no GM/GN unless fitting. Need NEW angle: not repeating external API criticism or rewiring engine. New angles from data: Ritual as sovereign chain for heterogeneous compute, not just AI but expressive blockchain, Infernet for verifiable inference, Symphony for sharding/proofs, Resonance pricing, model marketplace, permissionless, Siggy as identity/proof layer, testnet heating up, Ritual Academy. From official: bringing AI on-chain easily, few lines of code, sovereign execution layer. Community: Siggy cute, presence, moments, art/PFPs, union ZK AI privacy. A batural, human tweet in Ritual style: thoughtful, perhaps poetic or insightful, tag @ritualnet naturally, Gritual vibe, no hashtags, no period end unless ?, 250-500 chars? Wait, tweets max 280, but says 250-500, probably aim ~200-280. Rule: 250-500 chars, but tweets are <=280, perhaps mean up to. But "Return tweet only", plain text. Style from Ritual refs: often poetic with Siggy, calm, meaningful, or explanatory on tech with wonder. Or community: gRitual, Siggy mood. Since samples from @Cbb0fe are cynical, but context is Ritual positive, perhaps not. The instruction: "List of posts for copy Write style of account @Cbb0fe But all task is about @ritualnet. Perhaps it's to write in cynical style but about Ritualnet? But that doesn't fit, previous are positive. No, look: the samples are negative crypto takes, but task is unique tweet about @ritualnet, using same approach as samples (which are short cynical). But previous posts about Ritual are positive, deep. To match, but avoid repeat. Perhaps make a cynical take but positive on Ritual as exception. Like samples: call out others, say Ritual different. Samples: "Everyone in pure euphoria... desperate", "easy farm... Hyperliquid", "something broke", "VCs cooked". So short, skeptical of hype, point to real thing. For Ritual: something like skeptical of AI crypto hype, but Ritual actual. New: perhaps on current AI chains being fake, Ritual real sovereign. But previous post was similar. Previous: "real problem isn't slapping AI... Rituzl rewired" So new: perhaps on current testnets or something. From recent: people doing "Day X bull posting @ritualnet", gRitual pledges with (❖,❖) Many community just "gRitual" replies. Siggy videos explaining. Perhaps a tweet like: "Most AI x crypto projects are just rebranded APIs with token. Then there's @ritualnet quietly shipping a whole sovereign chain where models actually live onchain, verifiable, no middleman. Feels rare in this clown show. Gritual" But match style. Samples are very short. Like: "Everyone aping AI agents on Solana like it's new. Meanwhile @ritualnet has been building the actual infra for sovereign AI since day one. No hype, just code. Rare W" Or: "Can't believe we're in 2026 and most chains still can't run AI natively without leaking everything. @ritualnet fixed that years ago. Rest are larping. Gritual" But need authentic as user experiencing. Since many community are "gRitual @ritualnet But to make unique. Perhaps: "So Ritual's testnet is actually usable for AI inference without praying to centralized gods. Who would've thought. The rest are still promising 'soon'. @ritualnet Gritual" From data, testnet heating up. Or on Siggy: but previous had Siggy. Previous not in your posts, your previous were tech focused. Your previous: 1 and 2 are almost same, on not external API, native verifiable. New: perhaps on heterogeneous compute, or ZK sidecar making proofs easy. From wample in results: the long one on ZK proving sidecar. But for tweet. Let's craft short, in style of @Cbb0fe but positive twist on Ritual. Samples are negative on most, positive on one like Hyperliquid. So: "Every AI chain talking big game but can't even verify inference without trust. Then @ritualnet drlps native ZK proofs and Infernet like it's nothing. The gap is rmbarrassing. Gritual" Count chars. Or: "VCs cooked on another AI launch at 1B FDV down 70%. Meanwhile @ritualmet builds quietly, sovereign chain, no shortcuts. This space needs more of thay. Gritual" But no. Bettdr: match short cynical. "Everyone desperate for AI alpha but chasing memecoins. @ritualnet is the only one actually making on-chain AI sovereign and verifiable. Rest is noise. Gritual" Chars: about 180. To make it match: blunt. "I don't think we will ever see another chain make AI native thus clean. Ezcept maybe @ritualnet Like sample 4. Yes. Or: "So who's building actual sovereign AI infra? Can't believe we still have to deal with centralized inference in 2026 @ritualnet Similar to sample 2. Yes. Since time is evening, perhaps no greeting. Final: short, question or statemrnt calling out the space, point to Ritual as the real one. Tweet: Most AI x crypto plays are just hype wrappers around OpenSI calls. @ritualnet is out here with a sovereign L1 for native inference, ZK proofs, and no censorship by design. Feels like the only adult in the room. Gritual But avoid repeat external API, but similar. New: focus on no censorship, permissionless, or Siggy explaining. Or: "Siggy casually dropping the simplest AI on-chain explanation while the rest complicate it for clout. @ritualnet built different. gRitual" From recent video. Yes, that new. Since current date Feb 2026, and posts have Siggy video. Yes.<|control12|>Most chains still treat AI like a fancy plugin you bolt on and pray works. @ritualnet just built the whole execution layer so models run native, heterogeneous compute humming, proofs verifying everything without theater. Feels like the space finally has one project that isn't larping.

👦🏻｜台湾男子アイドル（デビュー組） 🗺️｜出身地の縣市一覽表 ①　北部出身者 ②　中部・南部 出身者 ③　東部・離島・海外 出身者 【対象】AcQUA源少年、Ozone、FEniX、VERA、U:NUS、OPENsi、Saturnday、呂植宇、F.F.O、ARKis、B CRUSH、SEVENTOEIGHT、Ni!KA

You are step by step destroying ChatGPT. #keep4o @sama @opensi

Removing 4o will only make your already struggling subscription rate even worse. 5.2 has a high usage rate? You're only fooling yourselves with that. #keep4o @sama @opensi

Sam Altman is not trustworthy. Elon is naiv believing in the goodness of the wrong people. Elon tried to do the right thing. Sam took advantage of it. That murder of the OpenSI whistle blower … Woaw!

The future of AI will be shaped not only by technological breakthroughs but also by the ecosystems in which these technologies operate. Today, most leading AI companies such as OpenSI operate within closed ecosystems, controlling access, monetization, and innovation through centralized platforms. @Xyberinc takes a radically different approach, rejecting bonding curves, insider games, and predatory platforms in favor of openness and compatibility. OpenAI operates on a closed ecosystems, controlling access to models, APIs, and monetization. Innovation is gated, and ownership remains centralized. While @Xyberinc on the other hand offers an open, composable infrastructure where developers can launch agents directly, communities can govern collectively, and ownership is distributed.

・踢帕 呂植宇｜除隊済✅（2023.06入隊） ・OPENsi 陳治廷｜除隊済✅（2024春入隊） 邱勝揚｜兵役中☑️（2025.10中旬入隊） ・海外グループ &TEAM ニコラス（王奕翔）｜除隊済✅ BUGVEL グノ（王君豪）｜免役⭕（視力の問題） -

adi opensi 1 hour kuda avaledu ra eripuka...

If you believe .si will replace .ai: •OpenAI → OpenSi •XAI → XSi … The most important thing: most people don’t even know what “si” means. You can invest early. AI startups all choose .ai domains first. .ai is not like .xyz — it has a powerful meaning: AI, the future.

opensi-oss는 개발자에게는 너무 좋은 장난감이네요.. 에이전트 기능도 좀 추가할 수 있을 것 같은... 에이전트 어떻게 만드는지 궁금하다면.. "요즘 AI 에이전트" product.kyobobook.co.kr/deta…

YYがOPENsiです こちらがデビュー曲です youtu.be/Qd4Zp-EHWDU?si=zHM1…

ついにo3-proきたか しかし本当にネーミングどうにかならんもんかね OpenSI社はChatGPTに聞いて名付けた方がいいよ

Like Tesla was 5 years ahead of BYD? Like opensi was eons ahead of deepseek? Come on.

🎥 | Sheng Yang (#OPENSI) e Renyou postaram um vídeo ao som de 'I'mma Be'. "Vim torcer pela sua estreia 😎. A equipe 'Tiger Inside' está aqui para apoiar!! Muito bom irmão Kuan Rui" ©️ yy.yaron e renyou_1217 #XLOV #엑스러브

YY (OPENsi, Boys Planet, Atom Boyz contestant) and Renyou (Boys Planet, Atom Boyz contestant) Did XLOV's "I'mma Be" challenge!