Hermes Agent: HyperFrames AI SEO is Insane (FREE!) Hermes Agent can now create AI SEO videos for you. ⚡ Free. Open source. Powered by a new skill called Hyperframes. The proof: a video ranked #1 on Google AI Overviews within 19 hours of publishing. The setup: → Install the skill: hermes skills install hyperframes → Prompt Hermes: "Create a video about [keyword]" → Hermes writes the script, generates voiceover, builds the animation, renders the MP4 → Optional: connect HeyGen API for AI avatar videos → Schedule it daily The unlock: rank a SINGLE video across Google, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Reddit, LinkedIn, X — multiple slots, one piece of content. 🎯 No camera. No editing. No experience. Just one prompt. Want the SOP? DM me. 💬

今日からできるLLMO｜言及の数より、AIに「どの役割で引用されるか」で露出先を選ぶ 【概要】 Search Engine Journalの新着記事によると、AI検索が同じソースを「引用するかどうか」だけでなく「どんな役割で使うか」まで決めているらしい。 第一に、BrightEdgeの調査によると、同じRedditのスレッドでもChatGPTとGoogle AI Overviewsで扱いが正反対の結果に。ChatGPTではMayo ClinicやHealthlineといった権威サイトと約36%並んで引用される一方、AI Overviewsで同じ権威サイトと並ぶのは約6%にとどまる。BrightEdgeはこれを「6x authority flip」と呼んでいる。 第二に、両エンジンはソースに「仕事」を割り当てている。LinkedInは専門・キャリア・BtoBの文脈で引用され、Redditは健康やお金や商品選びといったtoC文脈で引用されている。how to系の質問ではChatGPTがRedditを約2倍多く引用し、比較系の質問ではAI Overviewsがユーザー同士の議論を拾いやすい模様。 第三に、つまりAIが単にソースを選ぶのではなく、分類して答えの中の機能で使い分けていることを意味すると指摘。だから「どこに載るか」より「その言及がどの問いでどんな役割を果たすか」がAI可視性を左右するのでは。同じ被リンクや言及でも、文脈が合っていないほど引用される力は弱い。 やるべきは、露出先をデータ数で追う前に「自社が答えたい問いに、AIがどのソースを当てているか」を見にいくことが有効かもしれない。BtoBなら、専門メディアでどう言及されるかを想定質問とセットで考えるところから始めるといいのかも。 searchenginejournal.com/rese…

BRIEF OVERVIEWS by Artificial Intelligence (AI) *** @trevor8hobbs is the online handle for Trevor Hobbs, a multi-awarded author, 'Driver Training Expert' and creator of #DrivingToSurvive system *** trevor8hobbs is the social media handle for Trevor Hobbs, a multi- award-winning author and 'Road Safety Expert' widely recognized for creating the global DrivingToSurvive road safety book, Teaching Safer Driving to Save Lives On World Roads *** Government Testimonials plus My Qualifications & More in Pinned Post Bookmark this #Parenting, #Family, Teaching, Learning, Education post for later? from Amazon and Google Global Books Soon

**Yes, in a specific traditional practice called *metzitzah b'peh* (or metzitzah b'peh, "suction by mouth"), performed by some mohels during a *brit milah* (bris).** ### What Happens in the Ritual A standard *brit milah* involves three main steps (from traditional sources like the Mishnah and Talmud): - **Milah**: Cutting off the foreskin. - **Periah**: Tearing back the inner mucosal membrane. - **Metzitzah**: Suction to draw blood from the wound, believed in ancient times to promote healing and reduce risk. In *metzitzah b'peh*, the mohel (ritual circumciser) places his mouth directly on the infant's genital wound and sucks blood away. This is the step that matches the phrasing in your question. ### Context and Prevalence - **Not all brises**: This is a minority practice today, mainly among certain ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) communities. Most Jewish denominations (Reform, Conservative, many Modern Orthodox) and even many traditional mohels use alternatives like a sterile tube, pipette, gauze, or no direct oral contact. Leading rabbis in the 19th century already permitted non-oral methods. - **Historical rationale**: Ancient texts saw it as a medical precaution in an era before germ theory. The Talmud states a mohel who doesn't perform metzitzah "creates a danger." Modern understanding views direct oral suction as unhygienic. - **Health concerns**: Public health authorities (e.g., NYC Department of Health) link it to risks of transmitting viruses like herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) from the mohel to the baby, with documented infant infections and deaths in rare cases. Some communities require consent forms; others defend it as protected religious practice. In short, **yes, it does happen in some traditional brises**, but it's far from standard across Judaism and is highly debated for safety reasons. The mohel is typically a trained specialist (not always a rabbi per se). For more details, sources like Wikipedia's Brit Milah page or official health department info provide balanced overviews.

**Yes, in a specific traditional practice called *metzitzah b'peh* (or metzitzah b'peh, "suction by mouth"), performed by some mohels during a *brit milah* (bris).** ### What Happens in the Ritual A standard *brit milah* involves three main steps (from traditional sources like the Mishnah and Talmud): - **Milah**: Cutting off the foreskin. - **Periah**: Tearing back the inner mucosal membrane. - **Metzitzah**: Suction to draw blood from the wound, believed in ancient times to promote healing and reduce risk. In *metzitzah b'peh*, the mohel (ritual circumciser) places his mouth directly on the infant's genital wound and sucks blood away. This is the step that matches the phrasing in your question. ### Context and Prevalence - **Not all brises**: This is a minority practice today, mainly among certain ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) communities. Most Jewish denominations (Reform, Conservative, many Modern Orthodox) and even many traditional mohels use alternatives like a sterile tube, pipette, gauze, or no direct oral contact. Leading rabbis in the 19th century already permitted non-oral methods. - **Historical rationale**: Ancient texts saw it as a medical precaution in an era before germ theory. The Talmud states a mohel who doesn't perform metzitzah "creates a danger." Modern understanding views direct oral suction as unhygienic. - **Health concerns**: Public health authorities (e.g., NYC Department of Health) link it to risks of transmitting viruses like herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) from the mohel to the baby, with documented infant infections and deaths in rare cases. Some communities require consent forms; others defend it as protected religious practice. In short, **yes, it does happen in some traditional brises**, but it's far from standard across Judaism and is highly debated for safety reasons. The mohel is typically a trained specialist (not always a rabbi per se). For more details, sources like Wikipedia's Brit Milah page or official health department info provide balanced overviews.

Travel smarter, not harder! Yellow Productions & Topher the Panda 🐼 have spent 1,000 nights in hotels to bring you the absolute best Vegas guides and strict warnings about dangerous tourist scams! Combine their expert tips with the VESPER app to effortlessly build the ultimate, completely chaos-free trip itinerary. Download VESPER today and travel intelligently! Check out latest Vegas Insider Blog Post on Chris and Yellow Productions! qtmobapps.com/vesper/yellow-… Download VESPER Your Vegas Companion on Google Play Store play.google.com/store/apps/d… Download VESPER Your Vegas Companion on Apple App Store apps.apple.com/ca/app/vesper… VESPER Web Site qtmobapps.com/vesper/ VESPER Video Overviews youtube.com/@QTMobileApps VESPER Download Web Page qtmobapps.com/vesper/downloa… LinkTree linktr.ee/vesper.vegas #YellowProductions #VegasScams #VegasTrip #TravelSmart #StripStumble #VegasHappyHour #VegasDrinks #VegasTrip @StripStumble @VegasHappyHours @lvcc @Vegas @MGMRewards @MGMResortsIntl @CaesarsEnt @CaesarsRewards @Vegascom @BinionsLV @AriaLV @Cosmopolitan_LV @LuxorLV @ExcaliburVegas @MGMGrand @Bellagio @VdaraLV @PHVegas @HorseshoeVegas @ParisVegas @HarrahsVegas @TheLINQ @FlamingoVegas @WynnLasVegas @PalazzoVegas @VenetianVegas @ResortsWorldLV @fountainbleau @GoldenNuggetLV @ElCortezLV @4QueensLV @CircaLasVegas @PlazaLasVegas @Downtown_Grand @theDlasvegas @TIvegas @CasinoRoyaleVIP @MandalayBay @parkmgm @NYNYVegas @CaesarsPalace

news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/14… #cloudnews #クラウド #AI 最後に「AI Overviews対策を行っていますか？」と聞くと、「行っていない」65.4%が最多ながら、残る3割超が「積極的に行っている」「一部行っている」「検討している」に属しており、すでにAI Overviews対策を進めている企業も多いことが判明した。

📌 英国CMAがGoogleに新たな行為要件を導入。重大なランキング変更前の事前通知を義務付け、AI Overviewsを含む公平な検索評価とデータ移植性も対象です。 📊 現時点はUK市場限定ですが、外部規制機関がGoogleのアルゴリズム変更プロセスに介入し始めた点は業界全体の転換点です。 💡 規制動向に関わらず、流入経路の分散とコンテンツ品質の底上げが変動耐性を高めます。今から継続的な改善を。 #SEO #SEOニュース searchenginejournal.com/goog…

A German court has ruled that Google is liable for the false statements generated by its AI Overviews feature. The ruling could have massive impacts on the world's biggest search engine, which recently doubled down on giving users AI-generated results.

Podcast 'bestie' and host Jason Calacanis overviews 2026 summit dlvr.it/TT4PkZ

ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews do not cite the same sources for the same question. Treating them as one "AI" is where most visibility work goes wrong. Each engine has different training data, different retrieval methods, different freshness windows, and different signals for what it trusts. Feed all four the identical prompt and you get four different answers, with four different sources named at the top. You can be the number one citation in one engine and completely absent from the other three. The practical consequence is that winning a single engine is not winning the category. It is winning a quarter of it while having no idea what is happening in the rest. If your audit checks only ChatGPT, you are making decisions on twenty-five percent of the picture, and the missing seventy-five percent is exactly where your competitors might already be the default answer. There is a second trap inside this one. The engine you personally use is not necessarily the engine your buyers use. Founders who live in ChatGPT optimize for ChatGPT and never notice they are invisible on Perplexity, where a chunk of their market actually researches. Check all four. The spread between them is usually wider than anyone expects, and the gaps are where the opportunity sits. The Revenue Signal, weekly: onlinemarketingacademy.ai/th…

Google検索「AI Overviews」の対策、3割超のWeb担当者がすでに実施・検討【NEXER調べ】 webtan.impress.co.jp/n/2026/…

The PlayerProfiler Draft Kit is now available! I'm excited to dig into this as a fan, but also proud of the work I put into it -- over 20 player profiles and two team overviews from yours truly. If you want to win your leagues in 2026, this is the draft kit you need.

AI search is changing the rules of visibility. It’s not enough to rank anymore — you want to be cited by AI, too. See how brands are driving measurable gains in AI Overviews and SERP feature ownership with Brafton’s GEO strategy.

AI Overviewsの対策、3割超が実施・検討中とのことじゃ。日々のサイト運用にも影響が出る話、しっかり情報を見極めていきたいのう。 news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/14…

Why the SEO you know is dead. In his latest interview with The Verge, Google’s CEO admitted live that their AI, AI Overviews, was sometimes “more opinionated than it should be.” This admission shows that the rules of the game on the internet have changed for good. Here are the three key takeaways: • Google is no longer just an intermediary: In the past, Google worked like a directory. It gave you 10 neutral links and you chose for yourself. Today, AI decides, summarizes, and takes a stance. It chooses the “best” answer on behalf of the user. • Visibility will become a luxury: To create a summary, AI has to eliminate 95% of websites and keep only two or three. If your site is not selected as one of the AI’s sources, it becomes invisible, no matter how good your content is. • Trust is replacing keywords: Old-school SEO, optimizing keywords to please an algorithm, is dead. Today, the challenge is to prove to AI that your brand and content are reliable, legitimate, and authoritative enough for it to cite you. This is a brutal transition from a search engine to an answer engine.