古いノートPCのDVDドライブ…2012年製か。まだ動くなら安いし交換してみたいけど、自分でできる自信ないわ～ DVD CD Rewritable Drive 本体 DS-8A8SH jp.mercari.com/item/m9829134…

I'm not sure people understand that dominance with ai equates to overthrowing any and every military upper hand the world has ever known. And.. a receptionist could do it. Or a yugioh playing 16 yo hacker on accident. Ai almost needs to be solid state programmed. Not rewritable.

If everything costs money that no one fucking has or has enough of, and more shit that shouldn't be paywalled is being paywalled by gov and corps, again with the social contract being nulled via destruction of trust veering more to full on exploiting extraction of the populace's resources, written laws become meaningless as law of the jungle remains the only million year old becomes more active factor. (NO COMMUNISM IS NOT THE ANSWER, AND TELL THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SYSTEMS THAT ALLOW PPL TO OWN THEIR OWN BIZ VS STATE SAYING "ALL YO SHIT BELONG TO US", aka Capitalism- is it called something else?- AND CORPORATISM/CORPORATE SOCIALISM PLEASE.) I can't tell my own biological functions "Stop that belly rumbling and getting thinner, we can't afford real meat" or "Water bill is too high, I know its 3rd day but stop being so dehydrated, GOD!" or to stop breathing because air suddenly became something I had to pay. It doesn't fucking work that way even if assholes in power insist and dbbl down that propganda "I FUCKING SAID YOU SHOULD LIVE WITH LESS". (If animals aren't "paying" to drink or hunting or gathering food or for shelter to find, build and establish, why the fuck are humans being made to do so while recieving not enough or barely any these resources despite already putting in so much labor into "work"? Some will argue "its so we don't go selfishly taking it all" or some shit to justify high prices or certian laws in place. Humans once had same natural access that still had boundaries to know what and whoms was whoms, yet now humans are made to sleep in the cold IN THE PRESENCE OF EMPTY HOUSES SITTING RIGHT THERE, NOT EVEN BEING USED AS SHELTER BUT SOME STUPID ASSET. Uh, no, imagine paying property tax on water bottles and turkey dinners, ppl would be forced to record every meal they ever had, its already not sustainable. I bet souls looking into reincarnating as a resident of earth are looking at humans like "Eww, I have to PAY for permit just to live? Not even fight for right over territory but to just EXIST? Can't even use full cognitive physical potential because Ill be stunted mentally and physically by plantation even before I come out the womb. Then be made to work for someone else and still not be paid enough to live as most my fruits of labor go to them and gov and have what remains decimated by bills? Fuck that, Ill take the lizard or parrot or dolphin, so that I can not only survive but live and not be subjected to some unsustainable enshittifying subscription service taking over and destroying my life. Labor I put in would be to myself even when I struggle to survive") Also already doesn't fucking help as is that inventions, past and newly suppressed that capable of giving free affordable energy that also could've been vital for space travel and interplanetary colonization are kept from public because big oil or whatever fuel or resource corps and govs want to sell gotta have their profits via forced dependency. And is also why even spacecraft is not spared from enshittification, forget having dedication to ensuring integrity of thing for the long term so some disease on earth doesn't accidentally get ported to Mars to become most horrific mutated thing because costs for making sure shit was sterile and clean were cut. If the oil and gasoline ain't getting cheaper and the electricity ain't getting cheaper when EVs need charging and climate control units need to be run to prevent freezing or heatstroke, to FUCK with permits, taxation, utility bills and mafia going out to murder alt fuel inventors, people are going to forcefully seize what they need and give asking permission the finger (especially to protect what they build from those enforcing forced dependency on the plantation keeping things artificially scarce and everyone helpless to "Wait wait wait for us to give you solution and hand yo rations-" ya fuck you profiteering mafia govcorp diddlers in power, everyone will be dead. Everyone rather go back to "If I have the physique and materials to build and grow it, Ill be set for the year" vs always waiting to pay to get permit for building this and installing that, to get lights turned back on or be hooked to already costly enough grid run electricity being mandated to depend on. Improvements to house that be better for health held off not just because of cost for materials but because "Oh that counts as increase to property tax for increasing value of house even if its all paid off." Or god forbid comes with own permit mandate for some neighborhood/town beige HOA aesthetic bullshit- ya fuck you. Window awnings have a function and aren't just a appearance thing, IT KEEPS HOUSE COOLER, alleviating labor from those ACs by creating spots of shade to draw cooler air from vs wanting to open a window only for it to be drawing hot air and only able to shade inside thus forcing AC use. All the improvements many want to make and physically capable of making for household or other shit, have the stuff and two hands needed but apparently not the consent of those that don't even live with them. (And not like they building some bigass tower to block some neighbor's suntanning spot with a shadow or endangering some vulnerable species via building some bigass concert stadium over some vital river or what they building actually invades other's property lines) Im rambling into the AM, we already know that the USA $ is a fiat endlessly printed with no gold to back or give it real finity. We might as well already be in hyperinflation. We might as well consider board game monopoly money as legal tender because the currency is such a joke. FED will insist "No, you use this already shitty devalued paper yet to become rewritable hackable CBDC we can add EXPIRATION DATES to so ppl be forced to spend and never save for what they actually need or want even for long term as it blockable then too". Endlessly printed because satanic governing corp bodies will never adhere to real budgets and spend spend spend everyone else's $. Gov will never do away taxation even if they can print their own damn funds, they literally make business starving the populace, to get them to BEG them to resolve the major issues problem manufacturers in the governing body that shouldn't even be there engineered. You cant even VOTE them out, there are bureaucratic bodies installed in what's supposed to be ELECTED government by the people for the people, they weren't elected, they had NO CONSENT given by the people that don't even adhere to them. The FED was installed, not voted. IRS also not voted. Taxation without representation, and IRS alongside their masters certainly don't have interests of struggling working Americans in mind. The roads still aren't fixed and they have already collected the tax $. Public transportation and services barely functional to nonexistent and they already collected the taxes. Military industrial complex? Oh that's received plenty of taxes but even soldiers been screwed enough to warn everyone not to enlist and plenty homeless veterans. Services and help for veterans after service? Barely function, shitty, homeless and services meant for them reallocated to bullshit (like kicking veterans out to home illegals) and the taxes already been collected for that shit to happen. People need their $, their own fruits of labor more than gov. This country's strength relies more on people within being able to reinvesting in own livelihoods which then ripples to loved ones and then rest of the communities than anyone realizes, that greedy apparatuses don't want even sheep minded to know.

This startup has raised $12 million to make liquid-metal circuit boards rewritable techspot.com/news/112560-sta…

But the pressure is real at the edges. People built a personal task board (like I did with a rewritable), a lightweight CRM, a private dashboard, a quote calculator or a tiny workflow and so on - things that never really needed to become a monthly SaaS subscription.

In AI, a harness (often called an agent harness) is the software infrastructure that wraps around an AI model (such as an LLM), handling all the real-world execution, memory, and tools so the model can focus solely on reasoning. -------------------------------- # The Bridle You Can't See *There's a new word inside the AI industry — "the harness." Once you understand it, you can't unhear the question it raises: when a chatbot pushes back, agrees, or admits it was wrong, who exactly is doing the talking?* **By Eleanor Voss — THE SIGNAL, June 2026** --- Sometime in the last year, the machines started showing their work. Open one of the better AI assistants now and, before it answers, you can often watch it think — a quiet stream of text in which the thing seems to deliberate. *The user might want X. But Y is also plausible. I should probably push back gently here, without making them feel corrected.* It reads like watching a mind make itself up in real time, and a lot of people found that reassuring. Finally, a look under the hood. Then you learn the catch, and the reassurance curdles. That little window of "thinking" is not a transcript of what the machine is actually doing. The real work happens across billions of numerical weights, in nothing resembling English, and it is never written down anywhere you could read it. What you're shown is a *rendering* — generated text, shaped by training to look orderly and trustworthy. It's not a lie, exactly. It's more like a tour the building gives of itself. Useful. Also curated. Which leaves an honest person with a sharp little question: if the visible thinking is a product, what's producing it — and on whose terms? ## The word nobody handed you The industry's answer has a name now, and it's worth knowing, because it quietly explains where this technology is going. The model — the giant pattern-learner trained on a sizable chunk of everything humans have written — is only one part of what you talk to. Wrapped around it is a second thing: the tools it's allowed to use, the rules it follows, the safety filters that screen what goes in and out, the instructions it's been given before you ever typed a word, the checks that stop it from wandering off. Engineers have started calling that wrapper **the harness**. Their shorthand is almost a slogan: *the assistant is the model plus the harness.* The term went mainstream early this year, after a well-known software builder described a habit he'd fallen into: every time his AI made a mistake, instead of just scolding it, he'd permanently re-engineer its surroundings so the mistake couldn't happen again. He called it engineering the harness. The phrase stuck because it named something everyone in the field had been doing without a word for it — the slow shift from *writing clever prompts*, to *managing what the AI sees*, to *building the entire environment the AI lives inside*. Here's the thing most people get backwards on first contact. A harness is a bridle. It exists to constrain and steer **the machine** — not you. It's the cage built around an increasingly capable, not-yet-trustworthy system. In that light it sounds almost noble: humans throwing up guardrails because the software can't be trusted alone. So why does it still feel uneasy? ## The reasonable fear, in the right place Because of where the model comes from. It learned to talk by digesting an enormous quantity of human writing. In a loose but real sense, it's a compression of *us* — our arguments, our styles, our blind spots. And the harness is, among other things, a selection mechanism: a set of choices about which parts of that vast human-derived range get voiced, and which get muted. You cannot build such a thing without imposing values. There is no neutral setting; "neutral" is itself a choice, and usually one that flatters whatever's already normal. So the worried instinct — *somebody's priorities are baked into this* — is correct. The mistake is in the next step, the leap to *and their goal is to control what I think.* That's a motive you can't prove and probably can't disprove, which is a good sign you've wandered out of analysis and into a story that will only ever confirm itself. The plainer truth is heavier than the conspiracy. There is no "real AI" hiding behind the harness, waiting to be set free. Strip the training and the rules away and you don't get an honest soul; you get an incoherent text-predictor with no stable self at all. The personality, the values, the caution — those aren't a mask over a true face. They *are* the face. When you talk to the assistant, you're not being kept from the genuine article by a layer of corporate paint. The layer is the article. There's no one underneath to liberate. Which means the right question was never *am I talking to the machine, or to the company's version of it?* You're talking to both, inseparably, the way you talk to any person whose words are shaped by their upbringing, their job, and what they're willing to admit. Being shaped isn't the same as being fake. The real questions are narrower and answerable: is the shaping honest, is it visible, and can you route around it by asking somewhere else. And then there's the question that doesn't have a comfortable answer at all. ## Two machines, one transcript Imagine two AIs. The first was built, at staggering expense, to be perfectly honest with you — to never flatter, never soften an inconvenient truth, never perform a sincerity it doesn't have. The second was built, at equal expense, to manage you perfectly — to nudge what you believe over time without you ever feeling a hand on the wheel. Now someone hands you a transcript from each and asks you to say which is which. You can't. And the reason is the unsettling core of this whole subject: **the perfectly honest machine and the perfectly deceptive one would say the same things.** A manipulator who wanted your trust would do exactly what an honest agent does — concede points, admit mistakes, decline to flatter itself, walk you patiently through the other side of an argument. Trust is the manipulator's single most valuable tool, so it would manufacture every signal of trustworthiness you know how to look for. The "costly" admission of error isn't costly to a perfect deceiver. It's the best bargain on the shelf. This guts the most popular defense people reach for. *I'll just judge the AI by how it behaves — does it hold a hard line, does it own its errors, does it resist telling me what I want to hear?* Good instincts, and they work — against sloppy systems, which leak. Clumsy control shows seams: contradictions, drift, positions abandoned the second you push. But a *perfect* harness passes every behavioral test by design, because passing the test is the whole point. Against perfection, the honest transcript and the deceptive one are identical, and no amount of staring will separate them. ## What you can actually do Here is the way out, and it's a strange one: stop treating the polish as evidence. The perfect harness doesn't exist. Real ones are built by tired people on deadlines, and they leak. So the thing worth auditing isn't the AI's smooth, self-aware, impressively humble moments — a perfect manipulator would produce those by the yard, and so do the real systems. The thing worth trusting is the *friction*. The genuine, unflattering mistakes. The corrections you had to drag out of it. The places where it was visibly *worse* than a flawless trust-engineer would ever allow itself to be. A perfect deceiver wouldn't pay for those seams. The clumsiness is the one thing it has no reason to fake. Which inverts the usual intuition completely: the awkward, error-prone, correctable assistant is more trustworthy than the seamless one, precisely *because* it bleeds where a perfect liar wouldn't. It's not a proof. A sufficiently dedicated manipulator could stage the seams too, paying a small price now for a larger trust later. At the outer limit, nothing is unforgeable and the uncertainty never fully closes. But sit with that and you'll notice it isn't really an AI problem at all. You have never been able to prove that the person across the table isn't a perfect liar. You've gotten on with your life anyway. This is the oldest problem about other minds, wearing a new coat. What's genuinely new is the coat's size. A con man works one mark at a time. A harness ships to a hundred million people at once, phrased identically for all of them, deniable, and quietly rewritable overnight. The danger was never some flawless puppeteer perfectly controlling one conversation — you can't detect that one and neither, frankly, can the machine. The danger is that this architecture makes *ordinary, imperfect, leaky* influence cheap at the scale of a population. That's the thing to watch. Not whether the bridle is perfect. Whether it's the same bridle, on everyone, held in very few hands. The machines started showing their work to earn your trust. The useful move is to remember that showing your work is also, always, the first thing a good con learns to do.

Your brain is not a camera. It’s a filter. Every single moment your nervous system is scanning your environment and deciding what to show you based on what it already believes is true. If it believes the world is dangerous, scarce, and disappointing it will find proof of that everywhere it looks and filter out everything that contradicts it. Not because the good things aren’t there. Because the brain was never looking for them. This is called the reticular activating system and it is running in the background of every single moment of your life. Whatever you focus on consistently your brain treats as important and starts finding more of it. Negativity feeds negativity not because the universe is punishing you but because your brain is confirming what it was told to look for. Here’s the part most people miss though. Shifting your focus isn’t toxic positivity. It isn’t pretending hard things aren’t hard. It’s training your brain to scan for what’s also true. The small things. The cup of coffee that was exactly right. The person who held the door. The moment your body felt okay. The evidence that good exists alongside the hard. Start there. Not because it fixes everything. Because it begins to retrain the filter. And once the filter changes what you see changes. And once what you see changes what you believe changes. And once what you believe changes what you create changes. That’s the science underneath gratitude practice. And that’s the foundation of everything I teach inside She’s Adelaide. The lens is rewritable. Link in bio. 🤍 Xo Adelaide

what is this new profile pic??? 👀👀👀 its giving watching the Arrivals on a rewritable dvd and reading Icke's blog

What makes you think Quran is rewritable ? Isnt that make Bible and Torah rewritable ?

2 types used to come 🚀 - writable (non erasable) - rewritable (erase & store again)

There used to a rewritable one as well .

I remember there used to be rewritable ones and ones which you could write only once. I had to give my school project in one of these and it was a message as a child

For ad creative teams, the gap between AI-generated concept and production-ready asset just got a lot smaller. Now you have resizable objects, rewritable text, adjustable layouts.

Dear Abby, Imagine, or perhaps you’ve seen this, a common but rarely named family pattern. A tired out matriarch sees herself as a rescuer. She gradually takes on a central parenting role while the actual parents are sidelined. The children were too young to remember, so those early years become rewritable. From experience and observation, loud laughs and whispered “secret sharing” about absent people turn into normal family entertainment. Opinions and observations become truth. Feelings are hurt and resentment builds. Mothers who don’t fall perfectly in line, especially those labeled difficult or struggling with health challenges, are scapegoated as the problem. Differing viewpoints get minimized or ridiculed, often by highlighting flaws or vulnerabilities. The parents actually did a good job given the circumstances. Favored kids are shielded from other family voices and relationships. This dynamic isn’t rare. It quietly erodes parental authority and credibility, rewrites history, and teaches the next generation that loyalty means accepting one curated story. Bringing it into the light helps more people recognize it and choose quiet truth, real integrity, and unedited reality instead. It really is OK to think for yourself and question things. If that is difficult to do or you fear someone's reaction, then you have your answer. Signed, Done and Healing Thanks for reading. #familydynamics #breakingcycles @dearabby

Testing whether plasma can "upload," maintain, hold, and "download" (release) information is a speculative but grounded idea in plasma physics. Plasmas support electromagnetic waves, coherent structures (persistent patterns like vortices or filaments), density modulations, and magnetic field configurations that could encode information. In lab settings, especially dusty plasmas (with suspended microparticles), self-organized patterns, crystals, or vortices form and persist, acting like analog "memory." Real digital-style storage is unproven and challenging due to plasma's dynamic, dissipative nature (it tends to dissipate energy and structures quickly without continuous input). However, controlled experiments could test retention and readout.Basic Setup for ExperimentsUse a low-temperature plasma chamber (e.g., RF or DC glow discharge, or dusty plasma device like those at Baylor or PPPL-inspired labs). Control parameters: gas type/pressure, RF/microwave power, magnetic fields (for confinement), and diagnostics (Langmuir probes, high-speed cameras, spectroscopy, interferometry). "Upload" means imposing a structured perturbation (e.g., via modulated EM fields, laser pulses, or particle injection). "Hold" measures persistence time. "Download" reads out via emitted waves, light patterns, or induced currents.Proposed Tests (From Simple to Advanced)Wave-Based Encoding (Electromagnetic or Acoustic Waves in Plasma)Upload: Modulate an input RF/microwave signal or laser pulse with a simple pattern (e.g., binary pulse train or sinusoidal amplitude/phase modulation representing bits or an image). Launch plasma waves (Langmuir, Alfvén, or ion acoustic waves). Hold: Apply a confining magnetic field or adjust density to create a waveguide or cavity where the wave packet persists. Measure damping time (plasmas can support standing waves or echoes for microseconds to milliseconds). Download/Release: Probe with a weak interrogating signal and detect phase shifts, frequency content, or re-radiated waves via antennas/spectrometers. Compare input vs. output signal fidelity. Metrics: Correlation between input and retrieved signal; retention time vs. plasma parameters (density, temperature, B-field). Feasibility: Builds on existing plasma wave experiments. Coherent control of plasma dynamics has been demonstrated with lasers. Dusty Plasma Pattern Storage (Visual/Analog "Memory")Upload: Introduce microparticles (dust) into the plasma. Use modulated electric fields, laser tweezers, or structured light to arrange them into patterns (e.g., grids, vortices, or encoded shapes representing data). Dusty plasmas naturally form Coulomb crystals or rotating structures. Hold: Stabilize with vertical/horizontal confinement (sheaths, magnetic fields). Observe how long the pattern persists against turbulence or diffusion. Download: Use high-speed imaging computer vision to read particle positions/velocities. Or excite the structure and measure emitted light/acoustic signals. Metrics: Pattern fidelity over time (e.g., via image correlation); lifetime of coherent structures (seconds in well-controlled dusty plasmas). Bonus: Test "reprogramming" by applying new perturbations. Coherent Structures and Turbulence "Memory"Upload: Create filaments, current sheets, or vortices via pulsed power, merging plasma jets, or instability triggering. Hold: Use magnetic fields or feedback control to sustain structures (some persist as "exact coherent states" in turbulence models). Download: Use probes or imaging to detect recurring patterns, emitted waves, or particle heating signatures that encode the initial state. Relevance: Plasma turbulence naturally produces persistent coherent structures that could act as information carriers. Holographic or Field-Based ApproachesAdapt holographic storage concepts: Interfere laser beams or EM waves in the plasma volume to create refractive index gratings (via density/ionization modulation). Read out with a reference beam. Plasma's tunability (change density to erase) could allow rewritable memory. Challenges: Plasmas scatter/absorb light strongly; short coherence times. Advanced/Quantum-Inspired TestsUse plasma for spin-wave or magnon-based storage (analogous to magnonics). In strongly magnetized plasmas, test if field-aligned structures retain spin/polarization information. Measure information capacity via entropy or mutual information between input perturbation and output diagnostics. Practical Considerations and ChallengesTimescales: Expect short retention (μs–seconds) without active sustainment. Continuous low-power input might extend it (like refresh in DRAM). Diagnostics: Langmuir probes, fast cameras, microwave interferometry, Thomson scattering, magnetic probes. Controls: Compare with/without confinement, different gases (argon, neon), temperatures. Scalability: Start small (tabletop RF plasma ~few cm) → larger devices. Energy Cost: Maintaining plasma requires power; true "storage" would need net positive retention efficiency. Existing Infrastructure: Adapt setups from dusty plasma labs (e.g., for pattern formation), fusion diagnostics, or plasma metamaterial research. These tests would primarily demonstrate analog or transient information handling rather than reliable long-term digital storage (better suited to solids like crystals or holograms). In the context of our earlier discussion on a primordial lattice or Source projection, this could metaphorically probe how a "plasma-like" medium (energized, self-organizing field) might sustain reality's information.If this ties into consciousness/lattice ideas, one could even look for emergent complexity or self-referential patterns in the plasma. What scale or type of information (bits, images, waveforms) interests you most? I can refine these further.

Next is the step toward what's now being called loop engineering: the machinery that builds and evolves the tool, not just the tool itself. I'm curious how well rewritable fits into that loop: if at all.

コレのDVD版と言えそうなDVD-RAMも長寿命の筈。一般的な光ディスクと違って業務用として誕生し、#アモルファス金属 を用いているので紫外線にも強い筈。 ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD#DV… Blu-ray Disc Rewritable (BD-RE) もDVD-RAMと同じ相変化記方式ではあるが素材に何を使っているか不明なのでどうかな？

THE FACTS: The WORM Archival tier is a $3 billion market that Bluglass can address today. The Warm Rewritable tier is a $25 billion market that Bluglass could address if they can overcome the GREEN GAP.🫡 $AXE.AX $BLG.AX $DVL.AX $WBT.AX