"Section 215 / 54 notices are stabilisation, not restoration: securing the perimeter, propping roofs, the SEG scaffolding on Block B. Repair across the site ran to about £955k between 2021/23 Wondering why we have teens swinging from 70ft rafters? @ Mancraft ABC Ltd

Ρεφ καμ εξακοσα stabilisation

**Tweet 4/6** 🛠️ Policy action is underway: - 2025 new gov debt issuance: 11.86t yuan ( 2.9t yoy) - Special bonds: record 4.4t yuan - Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong now “hidden‑debt‑free” A national real estate stabilisation fund (~2t yuan) is also being planned. ---

Canada has announced $100 million in additional humanitarian assistance for Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank. The funding will support UN, Red Cross, Red Crescent, and NGO partners in delivering aid to Palestinians across the West Bank and Gaza. The announcement, made by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand on 12 June, brings Canada's total contributions to humanitarian efforts in Palestine to more than $500 million. The funding will help provide emergency medical assistance, food and nutrition, water, sanitation, shelter, and protection services, whilst also supporting peace and stabilisation initiatives. Canada called on Israel to urgently allow the safe, rapid, and unimpeded delivery of humanitarian assistance, the protection of civilians, including humanitarian workers, and full respect for international humanitarian law.

Le plus difficile n'est pas toujours d'entrer ou sortir. Parfois, le plus difficile est d'accepter qu'on ne sait pas encore. Sur l'or, daily montre des signes de stabilisation. Le cycle weekly, lui, reste à la croisée des chemins. Le marché n'a pas encore choisi.

Pakistan Business Council called the Budget 2026-27 a positive step toward economic stabilisation and growth, but said one budget alone is not enough without consistent policy and follow-through.

As discussions around delimitation gathered momentum across the country, Chief Minister @revanth_anumula anna positioned himself at the forefront of the call for a fair and balanced approach to representation. He has consistently argued that states which embraced population stabilisation, strengthened social development indicators, and made substantial contributions to the national economy should not find themselves at a disadvantage in the democratic framework. Through his persistent advocacy, what was once seen as a regional concern has evolved into a national conversation on equity, accountability, and cooperative federalism. His interventions have ensured that the aspirations and concerns of Southern states receive the attention they deserve. At its heart, this is a debate about recognising performance and preserving fairness. In championing that principle, Revanth Reddy has emerged as one of the most prominent voices shaping the discourse on India's future political representation. #RevanthReddy #Delimitation #FairRepresentation #SouthernStates #Telangana #Federalism #India

He questioned how provinces could fund education and healthcare with shrinking fiscal shares, calling the budget “anti-people” and “a budget for the state, by the state, and from the people.” Arif Jutt said the government had failed to present a strategy for broadening the tax base. He criticised the extension of tax exemptions on solar vehicles while imposing additional Federal Excise Duty to offset revenue loss. Jutt supported faceless tax assessments to reduce corruption but expressed concern over the lack of safeguards for taxpayer privacy and accountability. He said the measures protected officials rather than reforming the system. He added that lofty claims of saving Pakistan from default rang hollow when every Pakistani faced severe economic distress. Rana Atif questioned the government’s claims of stabilisation, noting unprecedented taxes over five years with little progress on privatisation, power sector reforms, or reducing circular debt. He said exports had declined by nearly $2 billion compared to an $8 billion rise under PTI, and that economic stability required political stability and fair elections. Issued by: Central Media Department Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf

Poor you! Its 2026! Fact check!! **Short answer: No. There's no published, verifiable proof that 80% of Tinubu's borrowing goes into infrastructure — and the "80%" figure circulating appears to be a misreading of a different statistic entirely.** Here's what's actually behind it: **Where the "80%" really comes from.** The 80% number traces to Works Minister David Umahi, but he wasn't saying 80% of borrowing goes to infrastructure. He said more than 80% of the ongoing road projects — worth about ₦34 trillion — were inherited from previous administrations, some dating to 2000, 2015 and 2017. [Legit.ng](legit.ng/business-economy/en…) That's a claim about how many *projects were inherited*, not about how borrowed money is allocated. The two have been conflated somewhere along the way. **What the government actually claims.** The official line is a justification, not a breakdown. Umahi's argument is simply that the government borrows because of work on roads and bridges, and that investing borrowed money in infrastructure rebuilds roads for the long term. [Discovery Alert](discoveryalert.com.au/nigeri…) That's a rationale — "we borrow *for* infrastructure" — not evidence that a specific 80% share lands there. **What the independent evidence shows — and it cuts the other way.** Analysts tracking the actual loans find a large chunk has gone to *consumption and budget support*, not capital projects: $800m for cash transfers to about 15 million households, $500m for women's empowerment, $700m for girls' education, $750m for economic stabilisation, and $1.5bn for reform support much of it to cushion the subsidy removal and currency shock, which critics characterise as borrowing driven by consumption rather than asset-building. **Tinubu's own numbers undercut the infrastructure framing.** By his account, debt servicing is *crowding out* infrastructure, not being funded by it: he's said Nigeria will spend about $11.6bn servicing debt in 2026, nearly half of projected government revenue, with those costs diverting money away from infrastructure, healthcare and education. If half of revenue goes to servicing old debt, the "most of it builds roads" story gets harder to sustain. **There's no audited DMO breakdown supporting 80%.** The Debt Management Office publishes the debt stock, but not a clean allocation showing 80% of borrowed funds flowing to infrastructure. And Africa Check has previously found Tinubu took liberties with facts about government borrowing, with several economic claims either unverifiable or wrong. **The one point in the government's favour:** a pro-administration think tank (IMPI) argues Tinubu is the highest capital/infrastructure spender in 25 years and the first to exceed the $14.2bn annual infrastructure benchmark recommended by KPMG. [Nairametrics](nairametrics.com/2026/04/15/…) But note — that's a claim about *total capital spending*, again not "80% of borrowing," and it comes from an openly supportive source. **Bottom line:** The 80%-to-infrastructure claim isn't backed by any documented allocation. It looks like a garbled version of Umahi's "80% of projects were inherited" line, dressed up as a spending ratio. The verifiable picture is messier: real road projects are underway and capital spending is historically high, but a meaningful share of the new debt has gone to deficit financing, social cash programmes, and servicing existing loans — not purely into infrastructure.

The Japan / UK SMR deal is going to be very interesting. Given Japan's deal earlier in the year with Trump for regular nuclear reactors, this should give Japan a lot of oomph when it comes to bringing down prices and price stabilisation for energy.

Nigeria Needs Policy Balance Beyond Stabilisation Gains, Says CPPE newsngr.com/nigeria-needs-po…

Understand if stabilisation is necessary as part of #trauma-focused CBT for children and young people at the 2026 Jack Tizard International Online Conference on #Trauma. With Dr. Jess Richardson. Still time to book your place! ⏳ bit.ly/4cxGPsJ

⚠️ Aux portes de Gaza, l’armée américaine construit une « immense base » coordonnée avec le ministère israélien de la Défense. Officiellement, il s’agit de stabilisation. Dans les faits, tout indique une architecture durable destinée à encadrer le plan Trump, sous couvert de paix, pendant que la démilitarisation de Gaza passe avant la protection des civils. Quand Washington bâtit des infrastructures militaires pendant que les négociations piétinent, faut-il encore parler de processus de paix ou d’un plan colonial qui avance sous protection américaine ? 🔥

The Fund is thrilled to have reached over 18 million Syrian #beneficiaries, since its inception in 2013 and up until the end of 2025, through its impactful #recovery and #stabilisation interventions on the ground inside #Syria. The SRTF Director General, Eng. @hanikhabbaz stated: "We are proud to have reached over 18 million Syrian beneficiaries with around 150 transformative projects implemented across vital sectors, delivering impactful projects in approximately 450 communities. Today, we stand as a trusted partner to the Syrian and international stakeholders, to continue to deliver lasting benefits through tens of active projects operating across the country. Building on this strong legacy of results, the SRTF is ready to scale up its support to advance meaningful recovery and development outcomes, laying the foundations for a more #resilient, #prosperous, and stable #Syria." #SDG1 #SDG2 #SDG3 #SDG5 #SDG7 #SDG8 #SDG10 #SDG11 #SDG15 lnkd.in/dwx3-hQJ

آپکی stabilisation یہ ہے کہ معیشت کو کوما میں رکھا ہوا ہے، اِس طرح رکھا ہوا ہے کہ آپریشن نہ کرنا پڑے- ٹھیک ہے سانسیں آتی رہیں گی لیکن ایسی زندگی کا کیا فائدہ! علی خذر کا دلچسپ تجزیہ @AliKhizar

lutte accélérée contre l’érosion côtière. À Grand-Lahou, inauguration d’une nouvelle embouchure et stabilisation du littoral via le programme WACA. Objectif:protéger les populations, restaurer les mangroves et renforcer la résilience climatique. ~60% du littoral touché.

$BTC 🦁👁️ Baisse de difficulté = les mineurs sous pression capitulent. Historiquement ces ajustements précèdent souvent une stabilisation du prix 📉➡️📈 #PoorToRichSahel

$BTC 🦁👁️ Le momentum redevient positif au-dessus de la zone $64K, après une chute brutale depuis $82K. Le rebond reste à confirmer, mais le marché commence à montrer des signes de stabilisation après la capitulation 📊 #PoorToRichSahel

Selon le président Macron, la stabilisation du Moyen-Orient dépendrait donc de la reconnaissance de l’État palestinien. Et que cela va, à lui seul, résoudre tous les problèmes de la région ? Et l’Iran, lui, ne nuirait pas à la stabilité selon lui ? Et la Turquie, avec sa volonté d’étendre son influence et sa domination dans la région ? Et le régime djihadiste de Damas, à la tête de la Syrie, qui massacre les minorités et instaure un système digne de celui de l’Afghanistan ? Et le Hezbollah, qui détruit le Liban entier ? À l’écouter : il laisse entendre que le seul obstacle à la stabilisation du Moyen-Orient c’est Israël car il est le seul état de la région à s’y opposer. À force d’écouter les islamistes et leurs sponsors, je vous le dis : le président Macron adopte mot pour mot leur rhétorique et contribue *de facto* à leur projet : le palestinisme, pour empoisonner notre jeunesse. Ni les islamistes ni Monsieur Macron ne s’intéressent en réalité aux peuples du Moyen-Orient ou à une stabilité véritable. La preuve en est : il vocifère contre Israël à tout va, mais il ne parle jamais des minorités massacrées en Syrie. Il veut boycotter Israël, mais déroule le tapis rouge aux djihadistes de Damas. Je voudrais comprendre : pourquoi des supposées victimes de colons israéliens, qui se compteraient presque sur les doigts d’une main, seraient-elles plus importantes que les victimes alaouites, druzes, chrétiennes et kurdes en Syrie, qui se comptent par milliers ? Pourquoi Macron garde-t-il le silence sur ces dernières, mais sermonne-t-il Israël à la moindre occasion ? Quelle est la logique ? On nous dira que c’est la géopolitique et les intérêts de la France. La diplomatie et d’autres enjeux que nous, simples citoyens, venus de Moyen-Orient pour ma part, serions incapables de comprendre, contrairement aux "Arabisants de salon" qui influencent la politique française ? Sachez que cette attitude sera perdante pour la France. Parce qu’elle la place dans un camp, celui des ennemis d’Israël, et non pas comme un arbitre neutre cherchant des compromis et encourageant le dialogue. Autrement dit : pointer systématiquement la responsabilité d’Israël et jamais celles de ses ennemis. Comment la France peut se revendiquer actant pour la paix quand elle s’oppose au dialogue direct entre le Liban et Israël ? Cette incompétence, et surtout cette mauvaise foi à persister dans une erreur grave, n’a d’ailleurs donné aucun résultat à part légitimer les actions terroristes du Hamas. Vous me direz, pour la Syrie, il a été le premier à légitimer le djihadiste de Damas, svp, et pas des moindres : ex Al Qaida et dont une partie de ses milices viennent de Daech. Revenons à la reconnaissance de l’état palestinien dont il semble fier. La déclaration de l’ONU n’a rien apporté, si ce n’est coûter des millions, et humilier Macron lui-même. Je rappelle qu’il a été boudé par son co-organisateur de la conférence, le prince héritier saoudien. Pire : Macron n’a même pas été invité à la Maison-Blanche ce jour-là, où Trump avait réuni tous les pays arabes et musulmans pour leur présenter son plan. Tous l’ont signé, et la reconnaissance prônée par Macron est tombée à l’eau, voire aux oubliettes. Tiens, d’ailleurs, on dit que des associations de la société civile ont été invitées en France pour le deuxième anniversaire de la reconnaissance de l’État palestinien. Dites-moi : à quoi cela va-t-il servir ? Certes, le dialogue est toujours un positif et il faut le saluer, mais croyez-moi, ces associations travaillent déjà ensemble sur le terrain. Et surtout, pour un tel événement, la France aurait pu inviter d’autres pays arabes qui, soit-disant, reconnaissent l’État palestinien. Macron savait qu’ils ne répondraient pas présent. Bref, cette conférence, même si c’est un geste de dialogue, ne servira à rien, si ce n’est à redorer l’image et à satisfaire l’ego d’un président inefficace, qui va bientôt partir sans laisser les résultats qu’il avait promis.