Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Mayor Of IKD 🐐 retweeted
Leave Tinubu’s online statistics! The ordinary person on the street hasn't benefited a thing under Tinubu. Nigerians on the streets have REJECTED TINUBU⚠️‼️
CHUKS 🍥

3
11
22
448
Rahul retweeted
Indian official statistics are a beautiful thing. LPG is up by 10%. Petrol prices have jumped 8%. Landlords in any half-decent area are increasing rents by 10-12%. School fees and medical expenses are rising in double digit. Bc even sutta has seen 30-40% hike. But yes saar, inflation is 3.93% 🤡🤡
INDIA CPI (YOY) (MAY) ACTUAL 3.93% VS 3.48% PREVIOUS; EST 4.02%
32
283
1,492
71,503
57s
This passage is not accurate as history or science, and it mixes a few real concepts (like institutions and development differences) with unsupported genetic claims, misleading statistics, and value-loaded assertions presented as fact. I’ll go point by point. 1. “High median IQ monoculture / 2 SD higher” •The claim that 1947 Britain was “~2 standard deviations higher in IQ than India” is not supported by credible scientific consensus. •Cross-national IQ datasets exist (e.g., some controversial compilations by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen), but they are heavily criticized for: ◦poor data quality, ◦outdated or non-representative samples, ◦cultural bias in testing, ◦unstable assumptions about national “IQ averages.” Mainstream psychology does not treat national IQ rankings as precise, stable biological facts, especially across time periods like 1947. 2. “Genetic IQ determines everything / environment only minor” This is also incorrect scientifically. Modern behavioral genetics finds: •IQ is partly heritable, yes. •But heritability is not 100% and not fixed. •Environmental effects (nutrition, disease burden, education quality, stress, toxins, early childhood conditions) can produce large population-level shifts over time. A key finding from decades of research is the Flynn effect (documented by James Flynn): •IQ scores rose substantially across many countries in the 20th century, •which cannot be explained by genetics. So the claim “environment only determines whether you reach genetic max” is not consistent with evidence. 3. “Low-trust culture, inbreeding, child marriage, rape → explains development” This is a causal bundle of assertions without scientific support in that form. Problems: •“Low trust culture” is a real sociological concept (e.g., generalized trust studies), but it is not a fixed ethnic or genetic trait. •“Inbreeding” and “child marriage” exist in some contexts historically and regionally, but: ◦they are not causal explanations for national cognitive differences, and ◦they vary widely over time and across India’s diverse regions. •Linking these directly to intelligence differences is not supported by mainstream demography or economics. This kind of reasoning is often criticized as post-hoc cultural essentialism: selecting social problems and treating them as inherent causes rather than historical outcomes. 4. “Magic dirt thinking” There is a real critique in development economics sometimes called: •“geography-only determinism” or •overly simplistic “culture-only” explanations. But the passage misapplies this critique. Modern development economics (e.g., work associated with Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson) actually finds: •Institutions matter a lot •Geography matters somewhat •Human capital matters a lot •Colonial history and path dependence matter a lot It is not “magic dirt vs genetics”. That is a false binary. 5. “Magna Carta / natural rights / inequality implies intelligence hierarchy” This is a category error. The Magna Carta is about: •limits on monarchic power, •legal rights of elites at the time,
not claims about biological equality or intelligence distribution. Mixing constitutional history with genetic determinism is not analytically coherent. Bottom line This passage is not a reliable description of history, economics, or human genetics. What it gets vaguely right: •development outcomes differ across countries, •institutions and human capital matter, •colonial legacy debates are complex. What it gets wrong: •treating national IQ differences as precise biological facts, •treating intelligence as nearly fully genetic, •turning cultural traits into fixed group-level explanations, •oversimplifying development into “genetics vs magic thinking”
Don't worry, according to statistics, more than half of Russian soldiers don't survive to be evacuated and taken to the hospital. They were first to achieve this, looking at all previous wars.
2
Meneer K. retweeted
Madyar has shared statistics marking the first anniversary of the Birds of the Unmanned Systems Forces (USF). The data is broken down into five categories: EARTH WATER AIR FIRE WORMS Part One: EARTH⤵️ In one year 💥Heavy equipment - 8150 Of which - MBT/IFV/SPH - 2580 - MLRS - 284 - ADS/RADAR/EW - 255 - Guns/Howitzers - 5034 💥 Automotive vehicles - 27 556 💥 Shelters/positions - 128 787 The USF makes up 2.5% of the armed forces’ personnel. Its share of results is 33%. 2.5 = 33
34
205
8,393
I asked a few questions about race based statistics and agreed with Grok that there shouldn't be a double standard when judging different forms of nationalism and it now thinks I'm a race realist.😅
1
Crypto Survivor 🦇 retweeted
🚨 Canadian household debt just hit 179.6% of disposable income. Q1 2026. Statistics Canada. Official numbers. $3,253,400,000,000 in household debt. $35.5 billion in NEW borrowing added in a single quarter. Let that land. For every $1.00 Canadians take home We owe $1.80. Not to buy assets. Not to build wealth. To survive. Video : @MarcNixon24 #Canada #Cdnpoli
19
137
327
11,098
I co-sign this. Boyd’s text was one of my favorite references while studying various topics in statistics, computer science, and applied mathematics.
2
A retweeted
Myron Gaines laughs at black math student for “mental gymnastics” on black crime statistics. “White people actually commit certain types more than black people per capita.”
330
226
4,649
221,892
Replying to @hawkmania4
If you play enough downs of football, the hit that Ray Lewis took will happen to you. It's statistics more than "who's the better man". 99.5 times out of 100, Ray Lewis wins that contest. I'm sure you can find a video clip of Michael Jordan getting dunked on.
2
จ้มจึ ꒰ 🍷🍓 ꒱ retweeted
STATISTICS @EstRvp 📈 ✨X 12.06 716,971 13.06 717,454 ( 483) ✨INSTAGRAM 12.06 2,897,755 13.06 2,901,494 ( 3,739) ✨TIKTOK 12.06 2,491,411 13.06 2,494,070 ( 2,659) #est_rvp
3
5
142
ఏది అయితే ఏంటి retweeted
Over 2 decades ago, was introduced to regression. Though not a stranger to statistics, regression was a fascinating toy. AI is more magical, built on statistics and probability. LLMs need solid computer science and maths backbone. Not retired program managers like Nandan.
2
2
67
Replying to @LetsStopC9
The far right use statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts. For support rather than illumination. "GB News total losses now more than £130 million since 2021." They aren't a media outlet, as well all know. They are a straight up propaganda outfit. Doing the bidding of £££...
6
Replying to @NkanyeziKubheka
South Africans think they are so good in their minds more than they actually are in reality. This kind of mentality can be seen through how they think they are better than the rest of Africa regardless of the glaring statistics whether it's poverty or crime.
2
Replying to @johnnyjenko
In comparison to Americans yes I do. That’s backed up by statistics. Richest country in the Europe is poorer then the poorer at state in the US. In the world they are probably the least relevant economic zone with little to no one action in any industry and most countries being stagnant for decades with almost no economic growth since the eurozone crisis. Southern Europe is probably poorer then most of Asia at this point.
21
While... they referring tnp to the one that actually won awards based on judges' decisions, even if it hurts them? The one that had organic growth statistics, and above all, they started talking baseless garbage because they never say what was wrong with it,
1
6
@WonderStudiosX your TV page doesn't work. It shows for a split second, then shows the message below. The reason: TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'statistics') Looks related to Cookiebot/PostHog consent code: window.Cookiebot.consent.statistics Also Cookiebot fail to load: Failed to load resource: consent.cookiebot.com/uc.js net::ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED
2
Replying to @toster1226716
the top left statistic is the outcome of all of the other statistics, by the way, which im 99% sure are fabricated in some way or another. oh who fucking knew that when you relentlessly bully someone they kill themselves
1
1
53
Replying to @DrAMSinghvi
Relax, such statistics are avlbl for each states.
2