Techbar kuda bane chaptadu

I love techbar, but buddy with that emoji i can't take you seriously!!

I might add Techbar, Prathima Adhikari, Trakin Tech English and sillycorns in the first 4 then comes Gyantherapy and geeky ranjit If it is international then MKBHD, mrwhosetheboss, max tech (specifically for Apple), jerryrigeverything (for breakdown) and linus(all round).

Just like exam hall mein Bhai aage ke word bata de main answer likh Loonga Le Techbar : Lumio Srishti : Lumio Arc 5 Projector aur Lumio Vision 7 55 inch TV

To everyone who criticized Indian Tech YouTubers without any valid evidence an apology tweet is due after this. Huge respect to Indian tech creators. More power to them. Special thanks to @Mrwhosetheboss for confronting it. @gyantherapy @techwiser @techbar

Tech's Got Latent Episode 1: Techwiser Episode 2: TechBar Episode 3: John Doe Defendents Episode 4: Gyan Therapy Final Episode: Arun Maini

Karbonn , Micromax, Lava , Gyan Therapy , Techbar, Techweiser. Holy Shit 😭. Ready with popcorn 🍿

Techbar ke dost ho kya😭😭

Meet another absolute "gem" of the Indian tech YouTube community: TechBar. 💎 He dropped a sponsored video with Vivo for the X300 Ultra, hyping it up as "MAX LEVEL Testing." The reality? A user called him out for showing: Exactly 1 ultra-wide photo Just 2 photos for 35mm shots 1 lonely comparison photo before ditching photos entirely. The funniest part? After getting called out, he silently changed that ridiculous, clickbaity thumbnail to hide the evidence, hoping no one would notice. 💀 This is exactly why people have massive trust issues with mainstream Indian tech creators. They aren't reviewers anymore—they’ve literally turned into brand managers.

TechBar real crime is posting photo of the NSP skyline as if it is Manhattan.

In today’s creator economy, audiences are constantly told to question brands — which is fair. The creator ecosystem works best when opinions are independent, criticism is honest, and commercial conversations stay separate from editorial narratives. Sometimes that line isn’t always respected. Not favouring anyone here, but as the head of my previous brand, I saw multiple instances where a few creators suddenly became “consumer warriors” on launch day right after paid collaborations didn’t materialize (remember the dead motherboard videos on launch day?). But as a brand head I didn't react and took criticism, whether genuine or not, on my chin. As over long period of time consumers see genuine efforts. At the same time, many creators remained extremely professional irrespective of business discussions — people like Arun Prabhudesai, TechBar, GeekyRanjit and several others who understood the difference between criticism and coercion. Honest criticism helps brands improve. Arm-twisting disguised as objectivity hurts the credibility of the entire ecosystem. Sometimes I see 'a few' creators suddenly take the moral high ground on “ethics” and “consumer interest” when they themselves have spent years blurring the line between honest opinion and commercial leverage. Audiences are smarter than the ecosystem assumes. They eventually see consistency — or the lack of it. FYI, just sharing a perspective, not favouring or speaking against anyone.

If anyone can prove that TechBar was funded, directly or indirectly, by any competing smartphone brand to target or unfairly attack AI , I will delete my entire channel myself. No hidden agenda. No paid narrative. Only consumer-first commentary, publicly discussed information, and my honest opinion as a reviewer.

While I will be watching this to give my full opinion later on, one aspect of this clip (at the very beginning) is already boiling me up. Madhav says that posting negative videos or stories without asking a brand is "fake journalism", not independent ones. Does this mean that, I have to be answerable to the brand before complaining about any flaws of their products, even as a regular consumer? Dear Madhav, it is OUR money. It is OUR choice what we bought with OUR own money. Low-income populations in Tier-2 and Tier-3 are still starting to first your brand & buy it: Does this mean if they complain about any flaws of your phone without asking you, you will silence them? This sort of thing works in feedback programs and loops, where you have to report bugs and issues of products to the brand under an official obligation, usually under embargos. However, you can NEVER apply this same thing to average consumers who are buying your products from Flipkart or from offline stores with their own money, and are not bound by the same embargos and agreements: TechBar, Gyan Therapy and TechWiser's came under exactly this aspect, they are not answerable to you if they, as creators, found serious flaws and misleading information in how you make products and especially market them.

First TechBar, now GyanTherapy, LET. HIM. COOK

His lawyers would be thrown out instead of TechBar and TechWiser's🤣

yep i am standing with all creators @GyanTherapy @TechWiser and techbar i want all of them to win i know its a hard case too since its in court etc

Of course, Techbar too, but I have not had a word with him so far on this thing, so did not want to tag without asking him first.

TechBar TechWiser Gyan Therapy

As someone who has spent years in tech content, this issue genuinely matters to me. What’s happening with @TechWiser and @ShokeenSanchit, fellow creators who’ve been doing great work for years, is honestly concerning. Creators should always be responsible and factual. But honest criticism, questioning claims, and expressing concerns in good faith should never become something creators are scared of doing. If brands start silencing creators with legal notices instead of addressing concerns, we’re all losing something important. Hope this resolves soon. Standing with TechWiser & TechBar on this.

Stay strong @techwiser and Techbar (@ShokeenSanchit). Hope honest tech journalism and fair criticism continue to exist in India.