The rifle scope overlay wasn't just a metaphor, it was a visual representation of my forensic findings. Trajectory analysis indicates the shot originated from the device held by the videographer, (Brayden Glascock) suggesting he was bracing or firing through a camera/phone setup.
It’s actually rather genius, because the suspect used the camera as a concealed sighting system, and the rifle overlay simply exposes how the lens was functioning as the weapon’s optic. 👀
Based on the movements and involvement of the second videographer, Andrew Feraci, I speculate that Glascock only needed to load the weapon, and then TURN&POINT. The sequence of events leading to the shot suggests Feraci may have acted as decoy while ultimately being the triggerman.
Whether this specific division of their labor remains theoretical, the available evidence strongly suggests that Feraci heavily participated in orchestrating the shot that took the life of Charles James Kirk, on September 10, 2025.
BTW, respectfully I want to be clear, if I were just “proving a point” I would ignore any data that didn't fit my theory. Instead, I am using the scientific method… I formed a hypothesis that the camera was a sighting system, and then I tested it against the trajectory, the bracing mechanics, and the Frame by frame evidence.
Science isn't about being right, it’s about following the evidence wherever it goes, even if it's inconvenient. Anyhow I do you know what you mean, and thank you for the comment. One last thing believe it or not you’re only about third person who has ever mentioned anything about the scope. lol…
The scope is to say, I got you TPUSA… If “The Pen Overpowers the Sword…, The a Video Camera is Just As Powerful When It Records”
Something like that.