Prove this in competent courts, of law. Not your mere assertions.

Every criticism of Musk’s success basically boils down to one of two assertions: 1) I’m deeply ignorant of basic economics and finance; and/or 2) I angry that someone I dislike succeeded/is more successful than me.

According to 🇦🇺’s former Deputy Ambassador to 🇨🇳 in the 1970s, 🇦🇺 ships transiting from Southeast Asia to Northeast Asia through the Taiwan Strait are undertaking “hostile provocative actions”. He also argues that the “One China Principle” is international law. Quite what either of those claims has to do with 🇦🇺’s acquisition of nuclear-powered subs is unclear. Interesting testimony nonetheless. A factually incorrect interpretation of international law on multiple points. Notably, none of the commissioners challenged those assertions. AUKUS Public Inquiry. Day 1.

$HPNN public facing entity #Digitalage #SocialSafe #OOve privately held by Peter Michaels, or Peter Michaels and others This is the reality of the framework you are working with. Not one filing recognizes the way a 100 percent wholly owned subsidiary exists that would make the public claims or assertions actionable by shareholders. NFA NLA NBS

The DravIdiot Instagram account “_hint_media_” appears to be promoting a selective interpretation of history to build a particular narrative against Sanatana Dharma. According to the claims being made, Buddhism was at its peak until Brahmins, with the support of kings, stopped cow slaughter and established Sanatana Dharma in its place. It is also argued that Brahmins once consumed meat and later began revering the cow. In addition, opposition to beef consumption is often portrayed as nothing more than an attempt to target Muslims. The account further claims that these assertions are supported by various texts and scriptures. However, the existence of a claim in a book or an ideological publication does not automatically make it historical fact. History must be examined through evidence, multiple sources, context, and scholarly scrutiny not through selective quotations that support a predetermined conclusion. Another important point is routinely ignored. Sanatana Dharma is not a caste. It is not synonymous with Brahmins. Sanatana Dharma is a vast civilizational and spiritual tradition encompassing diverse communities, languages, customs, philosophies, and forms of worship. It represents the collective heritage of millions of Hindus across regions and social backgrounds. Yet some ideological groups continue to promote the misleading notion that “Sanatana Dharma = Brahmins.” This oversimplification reduces a complex and ancient civilization to a single social group and makes it easier to direct hostility toward the broader tradition. A few simple questions deserve answers: • Beef consumption is permissible in Islam, but it is not a mandatory religious obligation or a foundational pillar of the faith. • Do many contemporary Buddhists and Neo-Buddhists around the world not consume meat, including beef? • If hundreds of millions of Indians regard the cow as sacred, why is the slaughter of an animal revered by the majority often defended while their religious sentiments are dismissed? • If mutual respect is expected for all faiths and communities, should the deeply held beliefs of Hindus not receive the same consideration? Historical debate is welcome. Critical examination is welcome. But selective narratives, half-truths, and ideologically motivated interpretations should be questioned just as rigorously as any other claim. Criticizing Sanatana Dharma is one thing. Misrepresenting history, caricaturing an entire civilization, and reducing a diverse tradition to a political stereotype is something else entirely. Arguments should be answered with arguments. Historical claims should be tested with evidence. Narratives should not be accepted simply because they are repeated often enough. #SanatanaDharma #HistoryMatters #FactCheck #IndicCivilization #CulturalHeritage #DebateWithFacts

No matter what, immediately shave that things Twist-E-Yarns off its head. There seems to be a correlation between those head-sprouts and their cocky demeanor. Show off that dome; it will only support certain assertions.

#Puntland republic President H:E Said Abdullahi Deni has announced before the Puntland Parliament that Puntland will continue to operate as an independent governing authority until a Somali government is established through genuine national consensus and broad political agreement among all stakeholders. President Deni argued that the current political trajectory in Somalia has undermined the federal system envisioned by the constitution, and reaffirmed Puntland’s position that it will not recognize unilateral changes to the country’s governance structure. He stated that Puntland will continue managing its own security, administration, and development affairs while advocating for a future Somali state built on consultation, power-sharing, and consensus. The declaration marks one of the strongest assertions of Puntland’s autonomy since its founding in 1998 and highlights the deepening political rift between Puntland and the Federal Government of Somalia over constitutional reforms, federalism, and the country’s political future. #Puntland #Somalia #Federalism #Garowe #PuntlandFirst x.com/MohamedSelh/status/206…

And somehow the Southwest political elites feel unbothered by these reckless assertions by the Ibos. Dear Ibos, please keep it coming and we will see who would run back the hole they came from.

Once again these are bare assertions, you have to show something to be the case rather than just saying it is. Additionally, you aren't reading. This is the third time I'll state I am not Catholic. Additionally deal with my arguments, you've moved the goalposts. S

This assertion is demonstrably false. As are all of the baseless assertions and unsubstantiated claims made in the fraudulent Bible. Add that to the false history, bad science, horrible morality, forgeries, late additions and changes, interpolations, agendas, theological fiction

Des preuves de vos assertions ?

Problem is the Saints aren't dead, in fact the bible makes it explicit that they are praying in the heavenly liturgy, additionally you still aren't dealing with the points I made, your just giving bare assertions and making false equivalences.

Doesn’t mean the others are equally guilty of the burden of proof if you are insisting upon a list of metaphysical assertions.

I haven’t just read it, I’ve studied it. You know, for someone who keeps demanding evidence, you’ve make your own share of unsubstantiated assertions. If you actually want to engage on judgment, I’ll post more on it today. Feel free to show where I’m wrong instead of just claiming I don’t understand it.

I don't think you know how personal assertions work. You can say Obama is Gay, but you have no proof. I can say you are a fucking idiot, and your post proved it. See how it works?

Avoiding exaggeration (lies), kneejerk responses, wild assertions, sweeping denunciations, petty repetition, copying views of others parrot fashion, cynicism rather than scepticism, and hitting one's target with shit, but above all using evidence to make one's point.

From believing the baseless assertions, unsubstantiated claims of their parent's religion implanted in their brain throughout childhood indoctrination, their brain's most susceptible, impressionable and formative years....to believing things based upon evidence and proof.

Your math skills reveal a lot about the quality of your political assertions.