remember when the odd eye dystopia ver dance vid came out and we all collectively lost our minds over the callbacks to scream and boca and dongie unmasking herself

【Light and Night: 5th Anniversary Livestream - Ending Animation CUT】 ENG SUB 🥹 the card callbacks, although i only saw the obvious ones LOL osborn = chaotic neon lights, 3rd birthday card evan = 8th bp card, 4th bday card sariel = 15th bp card, endless reunions

628 applications. 0 callbacks. Choosing CS might be the biggest regret of my life. 🥀

Lots of amazing callbacks this chapter! My full analysis coming tomorrow! #OnePiece

"Inline callbacks in Composables are killing my performance." This is a widespread misconception. Lambdas can allocate, but the cost is often vastly overstated. Non-capturing lambdas are cheap, and capturing lambdas only become interesting when they are recreated often enough to matter. More importantly, recent versions of Compose handle this case much better than old advice suggests. Historically, an inline callback such as onClick = { viewModel .select(id) } would often create a new lambda instance during recomposition. The concern was not the allocation itself, but the fact that a new lambda instance could make parameter comparisons fail, preventing child composables from being skipped even when nothing meaningful had changed. With strong skipping enabled, the Compose compiler automatically remembers many lambdas passed to composable parameters. An inline callback like onClick = { viewModel .select(id) } can be treated as if it had been wrapped in remember{}, using the values it captures as keys. As long as those captured values remain the same, the callback keeps a stable identity across recompositions, making it much easier for Compose to skip work that doesn't need to happen. In most apps, lambda allocations are nowhere near the top bottleneck. Don't rewrite clean, readable code based on a vague fear of allocations if you haven't measured first.

Fr! BOTW has sooo many callbacks to previous titles but they kinda make no sense since they actually mention events from different timeline. TOTK straight up ignoring some of the stuff from BOTW was disappointing too... like where are the guardians n stuff!! at least tell us!!

I’ve done more auditions and callbacks in the last month than I have the last six years combined. A little shaky on my feet as I step back into it, but after years of thinking I’d “lost it” it feels significant (and exciting) to be doing the work again

75% of contact centers have deployed AI. Only 25% have gotten real ROI. That gap doesn't come from bad technology. It comes from skipping the measurement layer. The Gartner projection for 2026: conversational AI will cut contact center labor costs by $80 billion. At scale, AI voice agents cost $0.09-0.20/min versus $15-25/hour for a human. A 1,000-call/day center can save $150K-$300K annually on staffing alone. Those numbers are real. I see them in what Ender Turing customers report. But the same data shows 75% of organizations haven't operationalized AI effectively. What's going wrong? Three patterns I see consistently: 1. **Deploying automation without baseline metrics.** You can't measure a 30% cost reduction if you didn't track cost-per-interaction before. Teams skip baseline measurement because they're in a rush to launch. Then they can't defend the ROI 12 months later. 2. **Automating the wrong calls first.** AI handles structured, high-volume calls well — lead qualification, appointment booking, account inquiries. Yet most teams automate whatever's loudest, not whatever's cheapest-per-minute to automate. 3. **Ignoring the quality side.** A call handled automatically but badly doesn't save money. It costs it — in churn, callbacks, and brand damage. Automated QA (tracking what AI actually says on those calls) is the missing feedback loop. 91% of customer service leaders are under executive pressure to implement AI. Most deploy fast, measure late. The 25% getting ROI didn't deploy faster. They measured from day one. If your AI has been running for 6 months and you can't answer "what did it cost to handle a call last quarter vs. this quarter" — you're in the 75%. The measurement layer isn't an optional add-on. It's what separates the 25% from the 75%. enderturing.com

You can always tell when the Hollywood callbacks dry up.

The twists in Genisys really flip the whole story on its head. Sarah and Kyle’s dynamic feels fresh even with all the callbacks. Solid pick.

The World Cup in Toronto means a parking ticket bonanza — But are the cops violating employment standards? Toronto parking enforcement officers are already facing scrutiny over alleged time theft. Our Toronto parking enforcement source, “Mr. Accountability”, has tipped us off regarding another scandal involving Hogtown’s meter maids. The ongoing controversy is the time theft issue. The so-called “green hornets” are supposed to put in a 10-hour shift but they call it quits after eight hours on the job (or less.) And yes, we have the video evidence. Note: the time theft was a costing taxpayers almost $6 million per year. Now comes another eyebrow-raising story: with the FIFA World Cup staging some of its games in Hogtown, the City of Toronto believes a bonanza beckons in terms of parking tickets. So a demand has gone out to have the meter maids put in 13 hour shifts. Just one hitch: this supposedly violates the collective agreement. And this also allegedly means that if an officer is injured on the job, there will be no compensation via the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). Uh oh… We reached out to the Toronto Police Association. Here is their statement: “With respect to FIFA, there are no mandatory callbacks for Parking Enforcement, and the longest voluntary callback is 13 hours, which is within the Employment Standards Act. No matter the length of the callback – or regular shift, for that matter – Parking Enforcement employees are covered by WSIB if they are injured while performing their job duties, no exceptions. “We would also be remiss not to mention our concerns about your ongoing harassment of our members at Parking Enforcement. We fully respect your right to be on public property and to report on issues in a fair and democratic way; however, we believe this can be accomplished without repeatedly approaching them for comment. If you have any additional questions or further comments, please come to us.” We do appreciate the TPA for getting back to us, something corporate communications at the Toronto Police Service refuses to do. However, our source tells us that a 13 hour shift is only supposed to happen under exceptional circumstances (I.e., a parade.) A shift of this length is not meant to be an almost daily occurrence. In the final analysis, we yet again have a he said/she said scenario regarding policing. The question is: who do YOU believe?

What stops trades from guessing under pressure? Clear callouts keep crews from guessing. Ambiguity forces field decisions. How many callbacks came from unclear calls in your last project? Eliminate Loosing Money on a Build access.house2homeplan.com/

#TyReZeroS4 Wait so i was thinking if the directing in S4 EP11 is mentioned to be top tier... Will the scene with Emilia asking Subaru's name change to the background of when Subaru first asked her name? Would be cool if they played around with Arc 1 callbacks

If we DO get an Among Us show season 2—which I really hope we do—I think it should be with a completely different crew. Red and Purple's arc had a nice ending to it that doesn't really need to be expanded upon. I wouldn't mind if there were little callbacks to the og crew though.