Adults that circumcise innocent baby boys should be impaled with the ultimately strong force in the extremely bloody way.

Nothing ‘ being conquered’ about it. Europe HAS BEEN CONQUERED. Warned ya for years, now pay your jizya, circumcise your daughters and wrap them in black garbage bags and quit whining. Accept the medieval fate you wouldn’t fight back against. IOW, quit your late term whining.

oh no the chocolatey veins will melt on my tongue reminding me of his sweet cum i must circumcise it thoroughly each time slow and steady i’m not gay

“he was drooling like a rabbi waiting to circumcise a baby”

I loathe the Washington monument. Freemason devilry. Suggestion for our next great public works project? Circumcise the monument and turn it into a Cross. Learn more here: professordavidclements.subst…

Lol totally going to work out exactly as thry expect. Also isn’t it still legal to circumcise boys in Canada? Yet we’re focusedon some podcasters?

Just watched a mf circumcise a snickers bar wtf

When you understand who owns the media, the answer to your question is easy. These are the same people who circumcise babies with their mouth and swing bloody chickens over their heads

"I'm hungry. I'll be back in 5 minutes, I need to go circumcise a chocolate bar."

How do you circumcise a redneck? Kick his sister in the chin 😁

how much of a faggot do you need to be to circumcise your snickers bar

//Scripture states in Leviticus to circumcise.// Again, Moses' parting instructions did NOT include physical circumcision and it isn't even mentioned between Joshua and Jeremiah (when the "Mosaic" customs started to emerge, 800 years after Joshua). Acts 15 is NOT referring to what is in Leviticus—that is NOT a proselyte conversion ritual. I would not typically use/post an AI search result but I know this is accurate. I don't have the Mishnah passage handy. This is what we see in Acts 15. It is also in Matthew 23:15...and I just realized your NABRE has an excellent footnote on this (see note j—except that they don't clarify that "Mosaic law" refers to what we now call "Oral Torah" not the written Torah, as I just explained): biblegateway.com/passage/?se… There is nothing about circumcision in Acts 15 that has anything whatsoever to do with Leviticus. It did not involve proselytism and physical circumcision NEVER had anything to do with salvation, EVER. That is why is was a controversy...the Pharisee/Judaizers simply had a made up custom/tradition.

Yes regarding circumcised girls. With words (telling people to go to their iman or mullah to ask is it an Islamic law to circumcise girls. Of course they are told 'no'. ) and the pen ... or these days with the computer. However, when it comes to girls being forced to join PKK I argue that it is mostly the girls wanting to join PKK. As an organisation that faces the Turkish state they cannot afford to have unwilling people know their locations etc.

imagine having to circumcise your snickers bc you cant stop thinking about men when you eat it "veins on the tongue"

They must be very very wealthy. Have you any idea how labour intensive it is to circumcise a prawn!

CANCER Zombie for a reason, They circumcise penis of their boys to hypersexulize him, allow him to marry 4 women so that lack of women will force Men to Trap/Groom/Allure/Groom Non-muslim girls. Read their Books, calling Non-muslim girls to be trapped and treated as slaves.

Called CANCER for a reason, They circumcise penis of their boys to hypersexulize him, allow him to marry 4 women so that lack of women will force Men to Trap/Groom/Allure/Groom Non-muslim girls. Read their Quran, calling Non-muslim girls to be trapped and treated as slaves.

Called CANCER for a reason, They circumcise penis of their boys to hypersexulize him, allow him to marry 4 women so that lack of women will force Men to Trap/Groom/Allure/Groom Non-muslim girls. Read their Quran, calling Non-muslim girls to be trapped and treated as slaves.

Just as the AAP, however, it also leaves it up to the parents whether to circumcise their sons or not, based on the same premises: health medical reasons, family tradition, social, religious, parents choice.

Sola scriptura doesn’t stand as no one held to that till the reformation. You won’t even defend it. You just bring up papal infallibility to change the topic. Scripture states in Leviticus to circumcise. You didn’t refute any of the church father quotes on baptism except to throw ad hominem attacks at Joshua Charles. So much for your charitable discussions between Catholics and Protestants that you clammer for. And for the third time I told you my interpretation isn’t infallible. And neither is yours. I have never heard anyone claim that the council of Jerusalem is not talking about circumcision. And any attempts I made to look for it state they ARE talking about baptism. But I guess your the authority there. if we disagree on baptism from reading scripture who has the final say so? You fail to answer that. And finally as asked before who is the pillar and bulwark of truth according to scripture?