Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
kassis (⁠≧⁠▽⁠≦⁠) retweeted
I’m still so happy that Final Fantasy XVI had an explicit on screen gay romance. It’s genuinely so heartwarming to me and a huge step forward for representation in mainstream media.
54
906
10,215
246,667
オタ活 retweeted
兎咲ミミ/ぶいすぽっ! Tosaki Mimi/Vspo! SFW illustration. Non-explicit artwork. All ages. #AIイラスト
21
993
8,577
The MIT license was never meant to solve node obligations, court orders, or stolen property — that's a strawman. It's a software copyright license. Satoshi's original Bitcoin was MIT-licensed and still defined node behavior via the whitepaper PoW consensus. PoW is what makes attacks expensive and solves double-spending. That's the whole point. Traditional bearer assets (physical gold, cash, bearer bonds) have worked in regulated commerce for centuries without this type of recovery mechanism. If someone steals your gold coins, courts don't magically rewrite ownership or teleport them back to your vault. They go after the thief — contempt of court, fines, liens, jail, seizure of other assets. Enforcement targets people and intermediaries, not the asset itself. Bitcoin was designed as a neutral base layer for peer-to-peer electronic cash. If coins are stolen or lost via key compromise, they're gone under the protocol — just like physical bearer assets. Compliance already happens at the edges: exchanges, custodians, and service providers freeze/blacklist addresses per court order. Sanctions and law enforcement use analytics and off-ramps. This works fine for regulated commerce today. BSV's NAR/DAR turns the ledger into a hybrid registered system with explicit governance via BSVA. You've transformed it into a private network with Terms of Service that all nodes must follow regardless of hash power. Pure hash-power finality isn't "anarchic chaos" that makes commerce impossible. It's the feature that keeps the base layer neutral and minimizes trusted third parties — exactly as Satoshi intended. Enterprises can build regulated applications on top of it without changing the core rules. These rules were never necessary for enterprise adoption. They were pushed by the CSW cult to steal Satoshi's coins and solidify their control over the network.
5
𝓢ꕤଘꮺ retweeted
💦 My Naughty Secrets 🔥 Fresh explicit content daily 😏 Subscribe: onlyfans.com/imtskristy/c6
9
969
6,693
227,231
Kamil Dolmat retweeted
Rarity's New Job 🫧 Full resolution & explicit versions available for supporters! 👀 AI-Free art 🖌️ 2026 commissions are open! ✅ #Rarity #EquestriaGirls #Mylittlepony #adult
4
104
1,063
12,816
you really think I follow her to know what would she do in her channel? plus its funny how you still claim that establishing boundaries to remain suggestive and drag the line at explicit porn is being an hypocrite

ALT Shrug Jake The Dog GIF

1
10
Replying to @DrShayPhD
The "Pope" is indeed mentioned. Matt 17:18-19 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Jesus is referring above to Is 22:22, and to the royal house of David, and the royal keeper of the house, who possesses the keys of the kingdom, whose doors he shuts, none shall open, and whose doors he opens none shall shut. Jesus is echoing this divine decree here in Matthew and issues it to Simon with a new title, "Peter", or "rock", the same firm foundation the "wise man" builds his house upon that will never fall, found in Matthew 7. Matthew calls Jesus the new "David". Petros or Peter, is His new prime minister. The disciples present, who of course knew Scripture, would know Christ's reference to Is 22:22, and would also know Jesus was appointing Peter to that office. The irony is that Protestants who make the claim there is no Pope in the Bible wouldn't know the Bible's contents to begin with without the Pope's decree and declaration regarding which books were Biblical from the fourth century, from among the hundreds of books and letters considered Scripture in the first centuries of Christianity. See the history. There were no Protestants for fifteen centuries and the Bible itself doesn't reveal an explicit Canon. Protestants must presume a canonical tradition too. And since Protestants are barely five centuries old, that tradition must be a Catholic one. They implicitly submit to the Pope's declaration by accepting the content of Scripture--even to deny the Pope with. Truly ironic.
2
𖤐 Caroline 🧸ྀི YJ CB IN JULY 🇵🇪 retweeted
off the record - ch 9 ❦ rated explicit ❦ 15.6k words 🔗 archiveofourown.org/works/83… 🔗 alterspring.org/@kizzunna
14
49
564
You should really fact-check before typing out a paragraph full of fan-fiction. Every single claim here has been debunked. The TPUSA board appointed her because it was Charlie's explicit wish, and the dating rumor was a proven hoax. Stop spreading easily disproven lies.
3
Replying to @Bby99886723
We do not need to include explicit scenes involving kids to tell a reality that kids are getting raped.
48
Omegle, OmeTV, and the Monkey app all have horrific UI, barely work, and are full of explicit content. Bubble fixes that with better UI, real profiles, genuine conversations with strangers. talkinbubble.com
1
15
🎀🥵𝒢ØØÑĘ𝒯𝒯Ę~𝑀Ø𝑀𝑀Ý🥵🎀 retweeted
She’s turning effortless beauty into millions, and you’re losing control over videos that aren’t even explicit. Dm for goon sessions perverts~💋💕
𝐌𝐎𝐌𝐌𝐘 𝐍𝐔𝐑𝐒𝐄 𝐍𝐔𝐌𝐁 🫦

6
26
181
Can we please get 7 more Senate Democrats to cross the aisle and pass the CLARITY Act? Because the reality is, Web3 isn't just shadow account grifters and scammers. It's founders like me: web2 trad tech youth math genius ex-big tech operator Asian female human. I’m building legitimate, wholesome consumer tech, and I want a severe, ruthless crackdown on actual crypto crimes more than anyone. But we need a clear rulebook to separate the builders from the bad actors. Give us the clarity to build in the US. 🇺🇸 Without the CLARITY Act passing, Web3 gaming in the US is facing a structural chokehold. As founder CEO of @BlockusGG, I see the tech being built every day. The talent is here. The infrastructure is ready. But the total lack of regulatory clarity is killing the industry. 🕸️🎮👇 Let’s talk about the in-game economy paradox. Web3 gaming is about digital ownership: turning items into tradeable NFTs and game gold into on-chain utility tokens. But without clear lines from Congress, every studio building an open economy is forced to play a legal guessing game. If players can trade a game asset on a DEX, is it a utility or an unregistered security? Without the CLARITY Act's "mature blockchain test," there is no safe answer. Studios are forced to butcher their game design and restrict features just to stay out of a regulatory minefield. The second reality: offering $5 or $20 referral bonuses to get people to invite their friends is standard for tech companies from Uber to DoorDash, but doing the exact same thing in Web3 turns into a massive regulatory landmine due to the legal classification of "airdrops." Under current SEC interpretation, giving away free promotional tokens is often viewed as a taxable or unregistered securities transaction because the studio receives "value" back in the form of marketing exposure, user growth, or data. This creates a deeply frustrating double standard: developers are blocked from achieving simple feature parity with Web2, preventing them from using standard growth hacks and viral marketing loops that mainstream gamers take for granted. Without the CLARITY Act's explicit provisions (which clarify that non-monetary distributions like airdrops do not automatically trigger securities laws) studios are forced to intentionally abandon referral features altogether, drastically slowing down technological innovation in the gaming industry. We built Blockus to provide the seamless wallet, fiat-to-crypto, and marketplace infra studios need to scale. But great infra can't out-code a broken regulatory environment. Congress needs to pass the CLARITY Act. Give us a clear rulebook, and let us build. 🇺🇸
Hitting the timeline of passing the Clarity Act into law by July 4 would require finding an ethics solution both Republicans and Democrats can live with, addressing issues in the Ag text, merging the bills, securing 60 votes, and passing it through both the Senate and House in just two weeks. Logistically impossible.
22
Replying to @mbathambali493
The role of the art is to tell stories that are happening. We can tell powerful stories about pedophiles without including explicit scenes involving kids. If you need to see such scenes to connect or relate to the story, then we have a bigger problem.
4
Pervert2 retweeted
(EXPLICIT) Released in 2002, Liquid City blended adult entertainment with Southern hip-hop culture, featuring rapper Mystikal as host and promoter of the project. Set against a New Orleans party atmosphere, the film mixed hardcore scenes with music, performances, and behind-the-scenes footage. At the time of its release, Mystikal was best known for his successful rap career and mainstream popularity, years before the legal allegations and controversies that later came to define much of his public image. Liquid City remains a notable example of the early-2000s crossover between rap culture and adult video productions.
121
3,792
60,659
480,099
222 sexy 🫦 All uncensored and explicit pictures on Telegram and Fansly !!!💋 🔗 in bio
41
noteasi lyswayed retweeted
(EXPLICIT) Before becoming one of Hollywood’s biggest stars, Cameron Diaz turned heads with a controversial nude photo shoot that embraced nude BDSM-inspired fashion and provocative imagery. The photos revealed a bold side of the future actress, sparking debate while showcasing the confidence, charisma that would later define her success.
5
87
2,630
48,916