Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
I wrote for @getembedded about assigning profiles of internet stars with fake fans
1
2
19
1,728
@getembedded was one of the first newsletters I ever subscribed to. Very excited about this expansion.
Subscribe to media_gossip, a new weekly newsletter from @getembedded that kicks off with a scoop about me, a take on the Gawker diaspora, and a blind item about a Feed Me wannabe
3
20
5,440
Subscribe to media_gossip, a new weekly newsletter from @getembedded that kicks off with a scoop about me, a take on the Gawker diaspora, and a blind item about a Feed Me wannabe
3
10
56
29,486
It’s like people who follow politics but only care about elections. They say “wow, this law will really shift the Governor’s chances in the next election” about a Governor who isn’t up for reelection for 3 more years! Maybe sometimes there are reasons other than getting votes!
2
278
Like this, serendipitously came across it after finishing a call with a sports body who is looking to commission a sports data collection/centralisation effort business case study. The long march toward watching sports through prism of a model dates back to made for tv innovation
6
2,195
"it alters subjectivity" that's really hitting. It's an absence of being
2
451
She is the sharpest voice in economics going in to 2026, I’m regularly stunned by her insights and her ability to communicate them
24
6,247
This brings to mind the way a lot of people and media outlets think about politics as the expected results of the next election.
2
47
at some point we must admit that South Carolina did not have a good football team this year
1
2
86
it's smart but not a lot of fun
1
2
70
Interesting observation! Reminds me of people focus on movie box office results as much if not more than the actual movies.
3
1,131
That’s a good analogy although sports are increasingly finite. The invasive effects of gambling are well documented and in some cases unstoppable - sure you can consume sports in a vacuum but most people do it for the social aspect, even if subconsciously.
1
2
109
maybe the ultimate end state of “process over outcome” logic
4
83
Jan 7
He can’t stop coining folks
3
195
No surprise someone so eager to cede human capacity for thought to the calculations of machines is only able to conceive of the world in the language of absolutes. Just a woeful misinterpretation of what I said. You should read more words as opposed to numbers
1
2
132
Jan 7
If you extend the trend we will eventually reach a point where our future is almost perfectly modeled which has some interesting free will implications from a philosophy standpoint
1
3
632
That is exactly what it is. That has been the cultural thrust of the tech industry's takeover of the neoliberal subject's deference to the objectivity of market data. The data rules. The data knows things about the world you could never know. It is the ideal mode of experience
1
5
178
I’ve been saying for a little while that we’re talking ourselves into “playing games/wins and losses aren’t a reliable metric for determining who is better” and while I see the logic that’s obviously dumb
5
9
2,286
watch the latest @pablofindsout interview with C. Thi Nguyễn, the author of The Score -How to Stop Playing Somebody Else’s Game The philosophy of what data brings and what it can't, a really interesting discussion that directly echoes, relates to this take in broad terms
1
8
3,002