好项目

期待下次相遇

希望后面能出新项目，更成熟的新项目

We have decided to sunset GitFish and wind down operations. It was launched as an experiment to explore new models for open-source funding. We are grateful to the community and our partners who joined us for the ride. Onward.

加油👏

尽绵薄之力

狼哥要开始操作了？

难得兄弟，还在cx👍

hi

@devfun 算吗？ 直接让早期项目孵化，发币

炒作而已，跟 Meme 一样。

好像有印象，我觉得这个 Gitfish 更容易炒作起来吧，但是也是发了币就摆烂了。

C402.markets 拍卖mint模式，拍卖完就可发射，任何人可以发项目， $ping 的dev开发的发射台，很创新很新颖

之前塞了一个Linux的什么项目，开盘就亏麻了，好在最后退款了😂

现在 Vibe Coding 这么火，每个普通人都开始发挥自己的创意搞一些属于自己的小工具和小项目。以我对币圈的了解，接下来很有可能会炒作类似 “Github 项目代币化” 之类的项目。Solana 上面有过类似的项目 —— @gitfish ，但是看官推已经两个月没有更新了，好像已经 Rug 了，还有没有在做类似事情的项目？

Ask your local superteam how to farm tokens, and then disappear, stop making the product, or just say that you've been hacked @Skylinedotworld @spotsdotfun @bballxyz @shoutdotfun @wormdotwtf @aerospace @gitfish @pigskindotfun @InboxApp_ @BelieveAlliance @ratio_dot_you alliance - launchpad generator, oh yeah - @believeapp

I'm mixed feelings rn. At the same time I despise ICM and token launches, thinking we should move away from them. And also at the same time thinking ICM and capital formation is a beautiful thing. Guess we're just early so most things feel morally corrupt (like the 2021 NFT era). Ecosystem needs to mature more. On the topic of GH repo tokenization: GitFish is doing repo tokenization but IMHO the wrong way, they're just launching memecoins. I can see a future where a credible GitFish-like solution rises.

Talking to a founder building a token launchpad. So I researched 13 platforms on desktop. Here's what I found. Platforms I looked at: Pump.fun Bullshot Raydium Launchlab BONKfun Sunpump Four Boop Jupiter Studio Orca Wavebreak Bags Heaven Daos.fun Gitfish 50k new tokens created daily! Wild. It's a mess out there. Biggest platform in terms of volume is pump.fun. You'd think they're doing something right so just copy them and you're good. The answer as always is it depends. 1. Positioning Most platforms present as the place to get rich quick by jumping on the latest hype meme. Focus is on trading and launching quickly. Assuming you know what a bonding curve is. This reflects in the not too polished designs and UX. On the other hand you have platforms like Jupiter Studio, the total opposite. Feels like it's for more serious long term projects. Trading is done separately so Studio is only for token creation. UI is polished and you have embedded education and tools to get verified by them and grow. Their wording aligns with culture architects, rather than full degens. A more niche example is Gitfish, targeting dev communities. They position as a way to fund open source GitHub projects. It's refreshing to see. 2. Creation flow As you would expect the get rich quick platforms have a a single form with all the fields. Minimal guidance. The other side takes you on a more considerate journey. Multi step process, explanations and tooltips, bonding curve previews. 3. Trading As you would imagine it's all about price action on most platforms. The exceptions are GitFish and Heaven where you're buying into an idea or a long term project. So what did I learn. Again, my conclusion is start with the vision. That should answer: Who you're building for Which projects do you want to attract How much education they need What tools do they need Clear answers for these are crucial. Otherwise you're building a something for everyone. No way to stand out, no reason for anyone to choose you over others.

突击了一下，把 FeHelper (github.com/zxlie/FeHelper) 的一部分重要issue都update过了，这两天抽空打包提交到chrome webstore 。也欢迎大家一起来提交PR，一起维护这个开源项目 @gitfish #FeHelper

A4fzh5VEDrqj55sye7jpdwEDeB4tCggGyN2gwuCxpump @gitfish this your token?