THE ANCIENT GNOSTICS BELIEVED THE WORLD IS A SOUL TRAP MADE BY ARCHONS. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Esoteric Teachings

Thats simply not true.... A lot of satanists are gnostics who believe God and the devil are the same being. And then there are actual devil worshipers.

No one has used those terms I just made up an imaginary guy in my head . But trust that people that hold such beliefs without having ever uttered these terms exist Yes I am talking to the techno-gnostics on /x/ that produced the odious and forsaken Instagram offshoots

all gnostics must consider this 👇

Luke - self references to being a prophet. Matthew, John and Luke plus 24 more also refer to him as prophet. This doesnt include the banned gospels, the essenes/gnostics or other sacred texts either. Just the current modern versions of the bible.

Gnostics aren't protestant you dweeb

none of this comes from the Bible or from any Gnostic texts as i have studiously avoided reading either what i believe is Gnostic in a technical sense, in that it is all based on what i have learned from direct personal experience i know what Christians think about Gnostics hah

Gnostics aren't protestants.

Jan Hus and Martin Luther weren't the first heretics. Judaizers: 49 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Nicolaitans: 90 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Docetists: 100 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Ebionites: 110 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Gnostics: 120 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Cerinthians: 130 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted. Marcionites: 140 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Valentinians: 150 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Montanists: 155 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Encratites: 170 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Adoptionists: 180 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Modalists / Sabellians: 200 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Manichaeans: 210 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Novatians: 220 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted. Arians: 318 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Meletians: 325 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Donatists: 330 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Apollinarians: 340 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Semi-Arians: 360 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Macedonians / Pneumatomachians: 370 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Priscillianists: 380 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Pelagians: 405 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Nestorians: 428 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Eutychians / Monophysites: 444 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Monothelites (proto-forms): 470 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Monothelites (formal 600 AD): “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Iconoclasts: 726 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Gottschalk’s Predestinarians: 850 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Eastern Schism: 1054 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Berengarians: 1050s AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Petrobrussians/ Henricians: 1110 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Cathars / Albigensians: 1140 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Waldensians: 1170 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Joachimites / Spiritual Franciscans: 1260 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Fraticelli: 1320 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Lollards (Wycliffe): 1370 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Hussites (Hus): 1415 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Conciliarists (Basel radicals): 1430 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Lutherans / Reformation: 1517 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Old Catholics: 1870 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.” Sedevacantists: 1970 AD – “St. Peter’s confession has been corrupted.”

He’s only speaking of the gnostics. You’re doing the hasty generalization fallacy. We know the intended group he refers to because he explicitly states who they are. You’re broadening that out without John doing so.

They left not because they were gnostics but "because they were not of us" If they were not so John doesn't say "they would have taught different thigns" but "they would have remained w/ us". You want this to be only about gnostics. John's statement does not require this.

everyday i lean towards the gnostics. a prison of flesh all around me, only consciousness is pure