The post humorously reveals the author deleted pre-written "cook" (roast) drafts mocking Morocco after their loss to Brazil, now shifting focus to prepare banter for Ghana and South Africa's upcoming friendlies. Accompanied by a meme image of an excited man gesturing at a table, it captures keyboard warrior culture in African football fandom during the June 2026 international window. Replies highlight fan amusement, with users joking about Ghana vs Panama and South Africa vs South Korea as prime opportunities for similar trolling content.

ひわさん(@waigetu1414)とのコラボ第３弾！ イヤリングセットにしてみました✨自分用！ image　ファルカ いくつかつまみ細工のお花を送ってくださったので何が良いかなぁと組み合わせを考えるのがとても楽しい…。 あと一つブローチを作る予定、纏めて出なくて申し訳ないですが見ていただきたゆえ！

sniffing my coach's dirty briefs like a good boy 🩲💕 9 full HD image versions 55 story pages this past reward 43 December only available on my store check my profile~

Hey @grok which record is difficult to break here in the image

Really love this cat image, so I make monster hunter version of it #MonsterHunter

Image Using ChatGPT & Gemini 📐 9:16 ✅ Upload ✅ Paste ✅ Generate Prompt 👇 South Asian woman in fuchsia pink bridal lehenga, kundan jewelry, vintage cafe, cappuccino, chandeliers, warm light, cinematic portrait, 8K. ✨ Made with AI

Where has the monsoon disappeared? Todays satellite image resembles a scene from April or May, characterized by limited clouds.

She was 57 years old. White hair. No carefully managed image. No media training designed to make her more palatable. Just thirty years of accumulated knowledge and the calm, unhurried authority of a woman who had spent her life mastering her subject. She sat on a BBC panel, answered questions about immigration and politics, cited evidence, made arguments — and then went home. The next morning, her inbox looked like a crime scene. Her name is Mary Beard — Cambridge professor, classicist, one of the most respected scholars of ancient Rome and Western civilisation alive. And the internet had decided that a woman speaking with quiet authority on television needed to be punished for it. The messages were not criticism. They were not debate. They were rape threats. Death threats. Coordinated campaigns of personal destruction targeting her appearance, her age, her voice — anything that could be used to remind her that spaces like the one she had just occupied were not meant for her. Most people would have gone quiet. Mary Beard went further in. She did what scholars do when they find a pattern that disturbs them: she followed it backward. Through decades. Through centuries. Through millennia. All the way back to some of the oldest texts in Western civilisation. And she found it had always been there. In Homer's Odyssey — one of the foundational works of Western literature, nearly three thousand years old — there is a scene that most readers pass over without registering its quiet violence. Penelope comes downstairs and asks the poet to sing a different song. Her own son, Telemachus, cuts her off. He orders her back to her room and tells her plainly: speech is the business of men. She goes. Mary Beard read that scene and recognized it immediately. Not as ancient history. As a pattern. In ancient Rome, women who dared to speak in public were not described as orators or thinkers. They were described as noise — disorderly sound, something that did not deserve to be called language or argument. Their voices were not speech. Their thoughts were not thoughts. In the medieval world, women who claimed public authority were labeled as witches. Elizabeth I — Queen of England, ruler of a nation — had to rhetorically reshape herself into something masculine just to be taken seriously as the leader of her own country. The silencing of women who speak with authority was not invented by social media. It was not a modern pathology or a cultural accident. It was built deliberately, over centuries, into the very foundations of how Western civilisation defined who gets to speak, what authority sounds like, and who is allowed to take up space in public life. Mary Beard had found something important. In 2017, she published Women & Power: A Manifesto — short enough to read in an afternoon, substantial enough to reframe everything you thought you understood about why this keeps happening. Her argument was precise and devastating. The problem is not that women lack the ability to lead. The problem is that the model of leadership itself — the template for what public authority looks, sounds, and feels like — was built by men over centuries and has never been redesigned. When a woman enters public life and doesn't fit that template, she is not failing. The template was never built for her. It was built specifically to exclude her, and it has been doing exactly that, efficiently and continuously, for three thousand years. The solution, Beard argued, is not to teach women to perform power the way men have always performed it. The solution is to dismantle and rebuild the very concept of what power is allowed to look like. She kept teaching. She kept writing. She kept appearing on television — white-haired, unhurried, carrying her decades of authority without performing it, without packaging it for comfort, without apologizing for it. The threats continued. But other messages began arriving too. Letters from women and girls who had spent their entire lives feeling that every door was slightly too narrow, every table slightly too high, every room slightly reluctant to make space for them. Women who had spent years wondering what was wrong with them — why they couldn't quite fit, couldn't quite belong, couldn't quite be taken seriously no matter how much they knew or how hard they worked. They read the book and understood, perhaps for the first time, that nothing had ever been wrong with them. The room had been designed without them in mind. That is not a personal failing. That is a three-thousand-year-old architectural decision. And one Cambridge professor with white hair and a calm voice — who refused to go quiet when the internet told her to — spent her career documenting it, naming it, and handing that knowledge to everyone who needed to hear it. Telemachus told Penelope that speech was the business of men. He was wrong then. He is still wrong now. And Mary Beard has three thousand years of evidence to prove it. via The Inspireist #FeministFriday #HERstory

Hey @grok can you remove the powerful character from this image

Husband works in the city and comes home once in two weeks Wife is a govt teacher in their village. Lovely couple building their life together, no issues Husband comes home as usual and wicked acquaintance in the village Told him his wife is pregnant by the village church Pastor, swore with their lives. The chief accuser said the child would die since the child came via infidelity according to tradition The child is born and is a spite image of the man The chief accuser said the child would die on the 8th day as she is being named That child is 25yrs old today and is getting married next week.

I love this image because it’s a classic ‘correlation doesn’t equal causation’.

No image has ever better captured our sense of cultural exhaustion, our sense that it's all been done before, than this one:

this image is actual art

Fox is getting a STIFF promotion! repost because second image quality was destroyed.

Esperance4u will not be participating into changing the image of a problematic man who seems to not learn from his past mistakes because he debuted my fave boy group 🫰🏾

Tbf the history behind this image is quite interesting since due to bad weather instead of usual wide window to the peak people had like 1-2 days, hence the huge line to the top.

Ch0di think it helps him with his public image among p@j33ts so better election prospects lol

You will never outperform your self-image, this is one of the most important things ever said about human behavior and almost nobody understands what it really means, your self-image is the picture you carry inside your head of who you are, what you're capable of, what you deserve, and what's possible for you, and your entire life is just your nervous system executing the orders of that picture, you don't behave according to what you want, you don't behave according to what you say, you don't behave according to your goals, you behave according to who you secretly believe you are, and the gap between where you are and where you want to be is almost always the exact gap between your real self-image and the one you keep trying to talk yourself into. The plastic surgeon Maxwell Maltz figured this out in the 1950s when he noticed that some patients, even after he fixed their face perfectly, still walked out of his office feeling ugly, and others with minor cosmetic changes walked out feeling brand new, the surgery didn't matter, what mattered was whether the internal picture had changed, and he wrote a book called Psycho-Cybernetics in 1960 that became the foundation of basically every self-development book that came after it, his point was simple, the brain operates like a guided missile that locks onto whatever self-image you've installed, and it will steer you, sabotage you, and bring you home to that image no matter how hard your conscious mind fights, you can win the lottery and end up broke again in two years if your self-image is "poor person," you can lose 50 pounds and gain it back if your self-image is "fat person," you can land your dream job and quietly destroy it if your self-image is "not good enough," because the brain experiences any mismatch between reality and self-image as a problem to be corrected, and it always corrects toward the image. This is why goal-setting, willpower, motivation, and discipline almost always fail in the long run, they're all happening at the level of behavior while the self-image underneath stays exactly the same, you can't out-discipline a self-image, you can't motivate yourself past it for more than a few weeks before it pulls you back, the only real way to change your life is to change the picture first, and the picture changes through repeated vivid imagination, especially in the relaxed state right before sleep and right after waking, when the critical part of your mind goes quiet and the subconscious actually listens, you spend ten or fifteen minutes a day living inside the version of you you want to become, with full sensory detail, with the feeling of it already being true, you do that consistently for a few months and the internal picture genuinely shifts, and once the picture shifts the behavior follows by itself, no daily battle required, because now your subconscious is steering you toward a different home.

johnny boy is trying to fix harts image by hoping they win the cup with him as the goalie, but so far all it's done is become a huge embarrassment if the nhl cared, john would be sacked at the end of the season