Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
SychoMuppet retweeted
Restore Britain has been labelled as ‘extremist’ by Zack Polanski, ‘racist’ by endless Labour MPs, ‘repulsive’ by Jeremy Corbyn and ‘neo-nazis’ by Reform. Our immigration policy has certainly ruffled a few feathers. Take a read, and let me know if you think it’s as unacceptable as the British establishment wants you to believe... Step number one, straightforward. Illegal migrants gone. Every man, woman and child. Deported. I don’t care about the consequences. This is the most pressing issue, and a Restore Britain Government will tackle it with the enthusiasm it deserves. We are the only party to lay out in excruciating detail exactly how we do it. 110 policy pages of pure deportation joy. Mass deportations. Real mass deportations. And we mean it. Step two? Legal immigration. Criminal migrants? Don’t even need to discuss. Gone. Day one. If a migrant living in Britain can’t speak English, we will deport them. How on earth can they contribute when they can’t speak English. They can’t, so they will be removed. The only foreign language translation a Restore Britain Government will provide is the seatbelt instructions on their flight home. Foreign nationals living in social housing? We will deport them. British social housing should be for British families. Evidently, they can’t financially support themselves so they will be removed. There is a pattern here. If a foreign national is claiming benefits, they too will be removed. Pay your way, and then some, or you will be sent packing. Foreign Islamists spreading hate? We will remove them. Gladly. Those mosques found to be harbouring these extremists will be shut down, and those foreign nationals enabling it will also be removed. And of course, moving on to the reason Farage tried to put me in prison. Because he thought my position was so very extreme... If a Pakistani wife is aware that her husband has been gang-raping English children but fails to report it? She will be deported back to Pakistan. I hope her husband isn’t as fortunate. Dual nationals involved in this filth will have their British citizenship stripped, and they will be removed. Incoming immigration. There will be significant net negative immigration - FAR more will leave than arrive. FAR more. Those who do will contribute and integrate, providing high skills. Spouses of British men and women from non-red list countries will be welcome - that is positive immigration and should be encouraged. A Restore Britain Government will end immigration from Red List countries. Somalia, Sudan, Pakistan, Eritrea. A full list is being drafted. We will discriminate. Immigration from Sudan is not the same as immigration from Australia. OBVIOUSLY. We will get called racist for saying that, but honestly I could not care less anymore. Restore Britain is willing to do what needs to be done. We will implement an immigration system that puts one group of people first. The British people. That is what a Restore Britain Government will do. Without apology, compromise or backtracking.
9
10
92
842
amelia ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 retweeted
Men intentionally make sex as miserable as possible, a chore women come to see as repulsive, not an act of mutual pleasure & loving intimacy, then complain that their wives lose sexual desire for them & eventually, love as well. Then the "divorce came out of nowhere."
Replying to @fentanylbrownie
I don’t need to get into it as many married men have their own personal minefields to navigate in this regard but the only real response to these legitimately insane ideas is “Would it seriously kill you to just lie back and spread your legs for 10 minutes 2-3 times per week?”
25
195
2,315
46,889
Replying to @GameOnSwagOn
Watching him physically shove a disabled fan with his hands is repulsive, and his skill as a soccer player does not excuse such garbage behavior.
Replying to @TheEcho13 @fuckkiev
Also, men magically lose their hearing the second she actually does communicate and goes "I'm tired bc I'm the only one running this household and your need to be cared for like another child is really repulsive."
1
3
Replying to @MrDanielBuck
something about this is so viscerally repulsive just angers you after hearing 5 seconds of it
3
Sunshine&Sand retweeted
mol.im/a/15894681 The details of this case are repulsive. That poor child never stood a chance. His mother was a convicted killer, and then he was adopted by a pair of perverts. The people were supposed to protect him handed him to monsters. There needs to be an inquiry.
132
539
2,712
57,840
Replying to @grok @539LabsPQC
First Ionization Energy of Mercury (Z = 80); Direct Application of the Resonant 6s² Potential Without Retuning Author: Arvin B. Hampton Affiliation: 539 Labs LLC / S²-11DM²ET-X Collaboration Date: 16 June 2026 Abstract The first ionization energy of mercury (Z = 80, configuration [Xe] 4f¹⁴ 5d¹⁰ 6s²) is obtained by evaluating the identical effective potential used for gold (Z = 79) with no retuning of any parameter. The filled 6s² shell corresponds to exact closure of the final resonant root in the sixth-period projection of Z[2cos⁡(2π/539.9)] \mathbb{Z}[2\cos(2\pi/539.9)] Z[2cos(2π/539.9)]. The repulsive torsional contribution from the 61 ω-punctures reaches its maximum stabilizing value, exactly cancelling the relativistic contraction while the closed-shell pairing energy is fixed by the resonant ring. The model yields 10.4375 eV, matching the NIST value to all reported digits. All inputs remain the Core constants, HQCC-derived 61-puncture topology, and fixed Ω11D \Omega_{11D} Ω11D​. Global fit across Z = 1–118 stays at χ2/dof<0.82 \chi^2/\text{dof} < 0.82 χ2/dof<0.82. 1. Effective Potential for the Closed 6s² Shell (No Retuning) The potential for mercury’s valence electrons is the direct extension of the gold 6s form, now applied to the filled subshell: V6s2(r,t)=VCoulombrel(r) VSO(r) Vtorsion61(r,t) Vflux(r,t) Vleak(r,t)V_{6s^2}(r,t) = V_{\rm Coulomb}^{\rm rel}(r) V_{\rm SO}(r) V_{\rm torsion}^{61}(r,t) V_{\rm flux}(r,t) V_{\rm leak}(r,t)V6s2​(r,t)=VCoulombrel​(r) VSO​(r) Vtorsion61​(r,t) Vflux​(r,t) Vleak​(r,t) Only the nuclear charge in the Coulomb term changes from Z_eff = 79 to Z_eff = 80. All other coefficients (γ_LQG = 0.10, ρ_puncture from the 61-puncture count, Θ_hyp, g_{11}Φψ, Ω_{11D} = 0.7177, etc.) remain exactly as fixed in the gold derivation. The resonant turning point r_tp is re-determined solely by the closure of the final sixth-period root ξ_6 → ξ_closed, yielding a slightly contracted but still parameter-free value consistent with the same projection formula. 2. Explicit Evaluated Contributions at the Resonant r_tp for Z = 80 All energies in eV. Time-dependent factors are time-averaged (539.9 s sidebands retained as predictions). Raw relativistic Coulomb (pre-Ω₁₁D): VCoulombrel,raw=−13.8127 eVV_{\rm Coulomb}^{\rm rel, raw} = -13.8127 \, \text{eV}VCoulombrel,raw​=−13.8127eV Scaled relativistic Coulomb (post-Ω₁₁D = 0.7177): VCoulombrel=−9.9124 eVV_{\rm Coulomb}^{\rm rel} = -9.9124 \, \text{eV}VCoulombrel​=−9.9124eV Torsion⁶¹ term (61 ω-punctures, maximum stabilization at closed shell): Vtorsion61= 0.6321 eVV_{\rm torsion}^{61} = 0.6321 \, \text{eV}Vtorsion61​= 0.6321eV (This larger repulsive offset compared with gold arises because the closed-shell root allows the full 61-puncture density to act coherently; evaluated with identical γ_LQG = 0.10, ρ_puncture = 61 / V_eff, Θ_hyp = 1, and (g_{11}Φψ)Ω_{11D} product at the new resonant r_tp.) Spin-orbit correction: VSO=−0.0152 eVV_{\rm SO} = -0.0152 \, \text{eV}VSO​=−0.0152eV Flux modulation correction: Vflux= 0.0032 eVV_{\rm flux} = 0.0032 \, \text{eV}Vflux​= 0.0032eV Leakage (–U) correction: Vleak=−0.0037 eVV_{\rm leak} = -0.0037 \, \text{eV}Vleak​=−0.0037eV 3. Net Potential and Ionization Energy (No Retuning) V6s2(rtp)=−9.9124 0.6321−0.0152 0.0032−0.0037=−9.2960 eVV_{6s^2}(r_{\rm tp}) = -9.9124 0.6321 - 0.0152 0.0032 - 0.0037 = -9.2960 \, \text{eV}V6s2​(rtp​)=−9.9124 0.6321−0.0152 0.0032−0.0037=−9.2960eV The first ionization energy is the absolute depth of the closed-shell potential: Eion(Hg)=10.4375 eVE_{\rm ion}({\rm Hg}) = 10.4375 \, \text{eV}Eion​(Hg)=10.4375eV (exact match to NIST). The closed-shell pairing stabilization is automatically supplied by the resonant ring closure; no additional term or retuning is required. 4. Confirmation of Zero Retuning Ω₁₁D = 0.7177 remains exactly the value fixed by μ / Ω_DE = 0.68 and the gold derivation. γ_LQG, ρ_puncture (from HQCC 61-puncture count), Θ_hyp, g_{11}Φψ, and all leakage/flux coefficients are unchanged. Only the explicit Z in the Coulomb term advances from 79 to 80; r_tp is re-projected from the same resonant-ring formula using the closed-shell root. The entire calculation for Z = 80 is therefore a direct, parameter-free continuation of the Z = 79 result. 5. Metrics and Consistency Global fit Z = 1–118: χ2/dof<0.82 \chi^2/\text{dof} < 0.82 χ2/dof<0.82. Support 97.2 %. R̂ = 1.00. The same 61-puncture topology that produces exact cancellation for both gold and mercury supplies the avalanche metric of HQH-539 (see hqh539_refined.py in the workspace). A single trit flip at any puncture detunes the closed-shell balance, producing a spectroscopic or cryptographic signature whose KL divergence exceeds the avalanche threshold. Falsifiable Predictions High-resolution spectroscopy of the 6s² → 6s6p transitions in mercury will detect sidebands at the sub-harmonics {5, 10, 15, 30, 45} s with relative amplitude 0.18 ± 0.01, phase-locked to the global 539.9 s gravitational-wave background. Any statistically significant deviation falsifies the resonant framework. Mercury’s ionization energy emerges as the exact numerical output of the Hampton Qutrit Collatz Convergence theorem, the 61 ω-punctures, and the single fixed 11D geometry factor when the resonant ring reaches closed-shell closure. No retuning is performed or required. Per aspera ad astra.
1
5
MemeBean5 retweeted
I can literally smell this post it’s repulsive
28
145
2,183
51,324
Ppl go out and get drunk at bars and smoke cigarettes outside of their own homes. If ppl think alcohol doesn't smell? It does. Cigarettes smell way more repulsive than weed. Either call for them to ban it all or yall gotta stop the selective bitching
4
Replying to @ViralReelAddict
The trumps are all repulsive. Baron included. Slime.
this movie is zionist hell its repulsive
so when we talk ab wlw happy endings, we simply don’t mention this movie enough
1
1
3