Oh there’s a bunch!
I’d strongly recommend the following:
1. Powerful Teaching by @RetrieveLearn and @PatriceBain1
2. Cultural Literacy by E.D. Hirsch
3. Motivated Teaching by @PepsMccrea
Quite a few but the most formal sources have been @KateJones_teach “Retrieval Practice: Resources and Research for Every Classroom”, @RetrieveLearn and @PatriceBain1 “Powerful Teaching: Unleash the Science of Learning”, and @effortfuleduktr has great blogs on the subject.
Amazing! “How Learning Happens” is on our PLCs potential reading list. I’d love to read it soon. Meeting frequently can be challenging for us too. We’ve created a few digital structures we use to collaborate on the readings and classroom trials between face to face meetings.
This! It’s a work in progress at my school. I started a science of learning focused book club style PLC this year. We are currently reading @PatriceBain1@PoojaAgarwal “Powerful Teaching”. We are conducting classroom trials and meeting quarterly to discuss experiences.
Haha. I hear stuff like that, too. When I think about it, though, think about how much more powerful these brain conversations would be if other teachers knew and spoke about it like we do.
Definitely see that mindset a lot in students. The taught behavior to shy away from productive struggle because it’s all about the right answer every time has been ingrained in them year over year with little opportunity to learn and grow.
once you receive feedback of the correct answer, you are more likely to get it correct the next RP opportunity of this information.
Then, at the end of class, ask those exact questions again. I'd bet many more students will get the general and stats questions correct.
So, I agree with everything that's already been said. Just to offer something maybe a little different:
Ask the general and specific stats questions during RP. Allow for a little frustration from those students. Point out to them that even if you attempt and get it wrong,
I’d point that out!
Offer response examples and discuss why one misses the mark!
It might not be a recall issue- might be an issue of understanding, which would mean you have more work to do before recall expectations.
Love elaboration! One RP strategy I use is to give them a claim (e.g., Climate change affects wildfires.) then Ss supply the evidence in the form of statistics. Maybe I could flip that when wanting them to recall more broadly. Give them the evidence and they form the claim.
Ahh. Okay.
So what information do you want to leave them with? In this case it’s not the actual stats but the trends that you’re emphasizing. Elaboration would work well in this instance as a RP strat.
Very helpful! For context, we had a lesson on wildfires and climate change in response to events in California. I presented Ss with several statistics. When doing RP the next day several Ss were hyperfocused on trying to recall the exact statistics in lieu of the broad trends.
So without more context I’d say that the broad generalizations probably form from knowing the more finite, specific info. Once that is automatized, they should be able to synthesize. Both potentially appropriate for RP, but one builds on the other. Make sense?