Since you believe in Sola Scriptura where do you see in the Bible that teaching. Where does it say that the church is only invisible?

This is precisely why we harp on sola scriptura, never get clarity on anything without the Bible

You must use a non Scriptural authority (the Church’s canonical judgment) to establish the very Scripture that sola scriptura claims is the only authority. If you’re claiming that’s an EO view, you’re wrong. The Bible didn’t fall out of the sky, it didn’t come with a table of contents. The foundation of sola scriptura is borrowed from the thing sola scriptura is designed to exclude…the Church It’s an attack by claiming the Church has no authority.

Not true. Sola scriptura

Let's check the fruits of Sola Scriptura:

but your illogic is 'sola scriptura,' and yet you can't even point which is 'scriptura' you're suggesting should be the sole one

you didn't indicate any version, so are you suggesting there is no difference between Ethiopian Orthodox Bible and KJV? Do Ethiopian Orthodox and Southern Baptists agree on that? Also, 1 Timothy 3:15 counters the assertion about "sola scriptura," since it says the church is

The rule always holds with these people: Sola Scriptura, except when it contradicts what I already believed.

no, you gave me passages from the Old Testament that don't say "sola scriptura" at all, and don't say that only this or that version of the Bible is sole authority... in fact 1 Timothy 3:15 says the Church is the ground of authority & truth, not Scripture

But you just said that no source is legitimate... so it sounds more like you trying to cop out of not interpreting history or facticity as regards Mary's actual age at the time "Bible doesn't say it, so I don't have to worry about it" can equally be applied to "sola scriptura"

so if you acknowledge there to not only be many versions of the Bible, then you're not showing where "sola scriptura" restricts this to any one of them, nor where "sola scriptura" is to be read out of any of the verses you sent thus far

Sola Scriptura was merely a formula used by Martin Luther to pressure and debate the Vatican; it is not a tool used to secure our souls for heaven. God is not only omnipotent, but He is also omniscient and benevolent.👍

But you didn't provide what I asked for, which is "where does the Bible say 'sola scriptura'"?

Wait, so you're telling me that Our Lord gave Peter power to bind whatsoever on earth which will be also bound in heaven? Is this correct? I just want to understand this part of Scriptura. Clarify this for me, brother. Please.

Ok Then let's set sola scriptura aside. You said Scripture, apostolic teaching, and history attest that revelation ceased. Which apostolic source or historical witness explicitly teaches that God would never again reveal doctrine through prophets?

But how could it be a 'core doctrine' consistently with itself if instructions to adhere "sola scriptura" is not in the Bible?

Setting aside any debate about the apocryphal books, my understanding is that the Roman Catholic position on Sola Scriptura is grounded on the belief that church tradition is equal in authority to Scripture. If this is true, can you describe the argument(s) for this position?

Your ignorance is amusing. Sola Scriptura means that Scriptura Alone has FINAL authority due to it's unique nature. Try to study a little bit before making such crass errors. You illiterati confuse this with Solo/Nuda Scriptura. amazon.com/Gods-Word-Alone-A…

Because you can’t defend it. Sola Scriptura is an attack on the church because its adherents create schismatic heretical sects that pervert the faith and lead men to shipwreck.

Autonomous robot? What nonsense is that? We are indeed subject to the Church as instituted by Christ, which as I have already shown you, Christ said that the likes of you who don't listen to the Church are to be regarded as heathen. Which manmade doctrines? Sola Scriptura?