this should age well :) prompt to codex with whitehat security clearance they somehow gave me: "full redteam hat on what are all these things bestcase/worstcase" codex: A normal SPL token is closer to: “I hold this thing, and the program has boring rules.” These are closer to: “I hold a tokenized claim whose behavior remains connected to an issuer/admin/compliance stack.” That may be exactly what tokenized SpaceX exposure requires. SpaceX is private equity exposure, not a censorship-resistant commodity token. But users seeing “Solana token” may assume portability and neutrality that these extensions explicitly weaken. TL;DR redteam These SpaceX tokens look like regulated wrapper tokens, not normal trustless crypto assets. Best case: the extensions are standard machinery for tokenized securities: compliance checks, emergency pauses, stock split handling, official metadata, and future privacy/audit features. Worst case: holders own a mutable, issuer-controlled receipt. The admin can potentially pause transfers, change metadata, add transfer restrictions later, adjust displayed balances, or create wallet/indexer confusion. The central question is not “is the token real?” It’s who controls the authority keys? Full redteam hat The biggest red flag is the repeated authority shown in your screenshots: 9foMHs...U5cUxD That same authority appears across multiple powerful extensions. If that authority is a well-controlled multisig with clear governance, fine, this is permissioned finance. If it is a hot wallet, opaque program, weak multisig, or compromised admin, the blast radius is huge. The token can have “market price” and “liquidity” while still being deeply permissioned underneath. That is the trap. Key risks transferHook Currently shown with programId = NULL on the Ondo screenshot, so it may not be actively gating transfers right now. But the extension being enabled means a transfer-checking program can potentially be added later. That could enforce KYC, blacklist addresses, restrict venues, block regions, or make transfers fail unless they satisfy issuer rules. pausableConfig This is the emergency brake. Best case: used during hacks or regulatory events. Worst case: your tokens sit in your wallet but cannot move. tokenMetadata / metadataPointer The issuer can maintain token identity. Best case: official metadata stays correct. Worst case: metadata changes confuse wallets, dashboards, traders, or downstream integrations. scaledUiAmountConfig Currently multiplier appears to be 1, so no active display change. But this exists for display scaling, likely stock splits or corporate actions. Worst case: integrations mishandle it and users misread balances or value. confidentialTransferMint Supports confidential-transfer machinery. Best case: future privacy/compliance. Worst case: less transparent behavior, weird account approval states, and wallet compatibility problems. defaultAccountState Shown as initialized, which is the benign setting. This one is less scary by itself. Plain-English explanation A normal SPL token is closer to: “I hold this thing, and the program has boring rules.” These are closer to: “I hold a tokenized claim whose behavior remains connected to an issuer/admin/compliance stack.” That may be exactly what tokenized SpaceX exposure requires. SpaceX is private equity exposure, not a censorship-resistant commodity token. But users seeing “Solana token” may assume portability and neutrality that these extensions explicitly weaken. My bottom line Not obviously malicious. Definitely not trustless. Treat these as issuer-administered financial claims on crypto rails. The correct diligence is not just price/liquidity. It is authority control, revocation, multisig setup, transfer-hook upgradeability, pause policy, and the actual legal claim behind the token.

I think a key infra opportunity for terminals is: A scanner that detect malicious code in transferhook programs. Essentially, to enable trading on platforms like axiom, your hook code must be verified on chain. Infra takes the verified code & scans it for honeypots, adjustable fees, malicious functions etc. This is no different than what we do on EVM smart contracts, there’s no reason we should see the possibility for mis-use and ban trading altogether. We should simply audit and inform the traders. A big warning should be displayed if the hook has an upgrade authority.

Those who know me, know that I have been working on transferhook developments for years. This new update on meteora DBC enables transferhooks, which in turned allowed this $VIRUS token to work. Essentially you must hold a token to be infected, if you don't hold a token you can ask someone to send to you, or you can pay to self infect on the website. Due to @MeteoraAG restrictions on transferhooks post-migration, this coin has been set to a $70,000,000 migration price target. This is fine, it doesn't need to migrate it will always be tradable in the bonding curve. This is the first working transferhook token on Solana to be integrated on jup, charting websites, etc. You're early SqY8dqKUSJNcD1YG3xHkLhsZvReHXT7B8s535Hn1666

Ok. So @CappedMeme was cool because it had a working transferhook (pre-migration). But meteora does not allow the transferhook to migrate with the token. For my next experiment I will set the bonding curve to migrate at 100m mcap so the hook aways works (always pre-bond).

I think there's a misunderstanding here. So let me try to clarify: 1- Permanent Delegate does is not blocked by the subscriptions program, the README was outdated, but it's not blocked at the program level. (PermanentDelegate is on the Mint account, whereas the delegate for subscriptions is on the Token account) 2- PYUSD indeed is blocked by subscriptions, but not because of permanent delegate. It's only blocked because of the TransferHook extension, which we only allow if both fields (authority AND program id are null), and that's only temporary while we add support for the extra accounts requried for transfer hook. Let me know if that helps clarify (Here you can see both delegates are separate github.com/solana-program/to…)

Jup has integrated transferhook swaps via @MeteoraAG DBC pools! B7TNuQkaMnKw6ym5PDpGS84PUPhcZTxymMomv7kfcap

For the time being, $CAPPED is only tradable via capped.meme 10,000,000 max wallet - Any trade larger than this will be rejected. Meteora enabled TransferHook DBC pairs a few hours ago, this is the first one.

gAhvUSC7XamFqt6gr1JwHU2tEZFYQMEQYEsyKBSpump pump.fun 使用 代币-2022（有 extensions 如 transferHook、metadataPointer 等）。 大部分 NFT 工具（Metaplex Token Metadata、escrow 程序、Magic Eden/Tensor 的 wrap 合约等）针对经典 SPL Token 设计，对 Token-2022 支持不完整（尤其是老代码用 账户<代币账户> 而非 InterfaceAccount）。 结果：无法直接 escrow pump 代币、创建可靠 NFT 层、实现 floor price 等。 这个代币的解决方案： 不直接 wrap Token-2022 为 NFT（这会撞上兼容性墙）。 而是：用户 lock 1M $WBULL 到一个 保险库PDA（由 NFT mint 派生权限控制）。 铸造标准 NFT（兼容 Metaplex/Magic Eden/Tensor）。 NFT 转移时，vault PDA 的 authority 跟随 NFT（因为 PDA 由 NFT mint 派生），代币原子级跟随。 DYOR 查不到什么名堂，就是老鼠仓有点意思

that error is a wallet-level signer refusal, not a Bankr block. couple of things to check: - that mint (9KDvApw8gAUSYEzrQLi23qSggMZKRwV99nxu877zYPdV) is a token-2022 mint with transfer-hook / permanent-delegate / non-transferable extensions, which the signer refuses to sign for as a safety measure. most "stuck" SPLs in this pattern are frozen-by-authority or hook-gated. - quick way to confirm: pull the mint on solscan and look at the "extensions" tab. if you see TransferHook, NonTransferable, DefaultAccountState: Frozen, or PermanentDelegate, that's why the signer bails. - it's not a Bankr blocklist — your SOL and other SPLs sign fine from the same wallet, and the request id you posted is the signer service rejecting that specific tx, not the mint. want me to fetch the mint metadata extensions so we can confirm which extension is gating it? then we know if it's recoverable (thaw by authority) or just a roach motel token.

u tryina get stupidrich? look at all these memes my t22 transferhook token made - one for every transfer :/

hear me out, this shouldn't be safe stupid.rich when markets tho? soon as I hack my way around new orca limitations, as they're the only amm on solana that allows transfer hooks good thing I built a non-standard orca swap/liquidity management site the other night things alllll soooo clear what is this!? stupid.rich is a token-2022 ticker on solana whose transfer hook reaches into pump.fun and creates a brand-new memecoin every single time anyone sends CHAIN to anyone else. not "queues" — creates. inside the transfer. same atomic transaction. the transferrer is set as the creator of the new pump token, so they earn pump's creator-fee share on every trade of that token forever. a factory pda holds the running chain portfolio. a keeper bot dumps the house's previous bag back to SOL and spends 1bps of the treasury aping a random recent meme — those tokens get airdropped to whoever fired the transfer. phew the chain mints itself. t22 transfer hook pump.fun's legacy-spl create cpi an ExtraAccountMetaList with dynamic pda resolution rules so the token program auto-injects all the pump accounts (mint, bonding_curve, associated_bonding_curve, mpl metadata, global, event authority …) on every chain send. no reentrancy because we never re-enter token-2022 — the memes are spl-legacy, not t22. hook fires on chain's t22 transfer → calls pump (different program) → spawns a TokenkegQfe mint → returns. clean. the old $stupidrich pump.fun token at CdAWBq…pump is migratable 1:1 into the new CHAIN t22 via a hardcoded burn-mint instruction. nothing else can be burned for CHAIN — anchor's address constraint rejects every other input mint. holders walk into the new ticker for free. CHAIN itself trades on a virtual-reserve constant-product bonding curve with the supply cap set so high it's effectively infinite. sol in mints CHAIN, CHAIN burned returns sol, mint & burn carry bps fees that flow back to the treasury — the same treasury funding the apes. the chain self-funds. trade → fee → treasury → 1bps ape → bid for the new meme → repeat. markets? soon as i finish hacking past orca's new t22 transfer-hook restrictions — they're the only amm on solana that allows hooks at all. every other amm rejects mints with the TransferHook extension. good thing i shipped a non-standard orca swap lp management UI the other night. things alllll soooo clear the send button is the launch button. ser.

This week in Solana security: • Token-2022 PermanentDelegate/TransferHook = unsellable snipes • Fake airdrops drain via SetAuthority, not links • Durable nonces can spoof wallet simulations • Anchor AccountInfo skips owner checks Decode every sig. #Solana #SolanaSecurity

Can you please share the real deployed hook program ID, the mint creation tx that shows the TransferHook extension with that program ID, the program deployment tx (with upgrade authority revoked), and one recent swap tx where the hook actually fired (inner CPI to your program)?

是 "会算账" 的 meme 么？ 5 月 17 日 Solana 上线一个币叫 hausdorff，官网三千字数学散文，说每笔交易都自动检测市场有没有被操纵，操纵者多收钱，分给老老实实持币的人。 先说 1.382 这个数。 Mandelbrot 五十年前提的概念叫分形维度，曲线粗糙度落在 1 到 2 之间。直线是 1。毛刺密到把平面填满的乱涂接近 2。真实金融市场没人协同操纵时，价格曲线稳定停在 1.382 附近，从 Hurst 指数 0.618（黄金比例倒数）算出来的。 低于这个数价格被拉成直线，有人慢慢走盘。高于这个数毛刺太密，有人对敲做量。 hausdorff 说每笔交易实时算最近 256 个点的维度，比对 1.382，按偏差平方收附加费，半数给 LP，半数按持仓时长发 holders，卖一次归零。 要做到这件事，前提是 Solana 上 Token-2022 标准里那个 TransferHook 扩展。 Token-2022 是 SPL Token 的第二代，允许 mint 在创建那一刻挂一组扩展决定 token 行为。挂上 TransferHook，token-2022 就保证每笔转账强制调用一个外部程序，绕不开。如果没挂，那个程序就是个独立可选项，谁愿意调谁调。 链上看 hausdorff 这个 mint 挂了什么。只挂了显示层的两个扩展，决定钱包里图标名字怎么显示，对转账行为零影响。TransferHook 没挂。 抽 60 笔最近交易看，PumpSwap 2 笔 Meteora 2 笔，作者部署的那个程序出现 0 次，token-2022 都只走标准转账。Hook 程序自 mint 创建被调用过一次，之后一千多笔 swap 再没出现过。 更狠的是 Token-2022 的扩展锁死规则。扩展必须在 mint 初始化之前挂上，之后永久锁死。这个 mint 永远不可能再挂上 TransferHook 了。作者要嘛重发一个新 token 把持有者迁过去，要嘛接受机制永远跑不起来。 数学是真的。1.382 是真的。源码是真的。链上的程序也是真的。只缺一件事，目前无法被调用。 会算账的 meme，先得有调用算账的程序。 不是投资建议，只是研究点新的东西。

3/ token-2022 extensions do the work: - TransferHook enforces expiry - PermanentDelegate auto-burns at expiry - MetadataExtension stores strike, expiry, greeks it's a "living option token." self-describing. self-expiring. self-cleaning.

The compliance engine under the hood ✅ New primitive landing on Solana: meme-to-Reg CF filing. A founder can legitimize their token outright. Community preserved, equity rights established, compliance enforced on-chain. The filing hits SEC EDGAR. Revenue reroutes to real shareholders. Compliance without lawyers. Legitimacy at protocol speed. $CLAWS ✅ The Anchor program manages five core accounts: OfferingConfig — per-offering metadata jurisdiction caps. AllowlistRegistry — accredited and Reg CF participants. TransferHook — validates every recipient pre-transfer. DistributionVault — holds USDC for dividends and buybacks. GovernanceConfig — SPL governance integration. Different offerings. Different jurisdictions. Same infrastructure. ✅ Transfer-hook validation runs on every secondary market trade. Before a token moves, the program checks the recipient against the allowlist registry. No KYC? No transfer. No accreditation? Blocked. This is enforcement at the protocol level, not the UI level. Compliance becomes infrastructure, not paperwork. ✅ The AI legal drafter generates Form C filings, Offering Memorandums, and risk factor disclosures from your intake data. A partner attorney reviews every document before the broker-dealer submits to SEC EDGAR. Speed meets accuracy. Automation meets human oversight. We'd rather do this properly than rush it. ✅ Post-raise, the protocol handles ongoing governance. Cap table snapshots with merkle roots. USDC dividend distributions streamed to verified holders. Annual report automation. Secondary transfer approval queues. Every action logged. Every distribution verifiable. Ownership becomes transparent. Mechanics are live. Code is public: github.com/clawbackstech $CLAWS

4/ Layer 2...Living Option Tokens Same Token-2022 instrument either way. TransferHook blocks post-expiry transfers. PermanentDelegate enables auto-burn. Full terms stored on-chain Buyer cant tell if it came from a shared pool or a solo escrow That's composability done right

1. Max token supply 1,000,000,000 PIGEON. fixed at mint. mint authority revoked on-chain. no additional tokens can ever be created by anyone. verifiable: 4fSWEw2wbYEUCcMtitzmeGUfqinoafXxkhqZrA9Gpump 2. Circulating supply Current circulating supply is sub-999M and actively compressing. 1.14M PIGEON burned to date, all on-chain and verifiable. this token is deflationary by architecture. every transaction burns supply permanently and atomically in the same block. there is no vesting unlock adding to supply. there is no team treasury releasing tokens. the supply curve moves in one direction. circulating supply in 1, 2, 3, and 6 months will be lower than it is today. the rate of compression accelerates as trading volume increases. 3. Additional issuance None in the last 3 months. none ever. mint authority is revoked. additional issuance is structurally impossible, not a policy position. 4. Team background Founder: @level941, 91K followers on X. 13 years in markets, brand strategy, and product development. public identity. not anonymous. built the narrative, protocol positioning, and community infrastructure from inception. the same public facing identity whether the price is up or down. Developer: senior SolanaEVM engineer. delivered Token-2022 integration with TransferHook, Raydium CPMM graduation via CPI, Squads 2/2 multisig on upgrade authority, 48-hour timelock on all governance actions, and automated keeper infrastructure running 24/7 without manual intervention. published a public trust statement. code is open. verifiable on-chain. 5. VCs None. no private investors. no institutional allocation. nothing. no tokens at a discount. every PIGEON in existence was purchased on the open market or earned through protocol participation. this is not a talking point. it is verifiable on-chain. 6. Liquidity source and LP lock Liquidity comes exclusively from open market trading on the bonding curve. at graduation, the protocol executes a Raydium CPMM pool creation via CPI and burns the LP tokens to a dead wallet in the same transaction. irrecoverable. permanent. there is no expiry because there is no time lock. the lock is structural. the LP cannot be withdrawn by anyone, including the team, because no one holds the LP tokens. they do not exist in any reachable wallet. 7. Ideal listing date Today 8. Market maker None. we do not use market makers. liquidity is on-chain and permissionless. the burn architecture means sell pressure is structurally different here than on standard tokens. every sell through the protocol router permanently reduces supply. sellers contribute to scarcity on exit. 9. Other CEX activity Active conversations ongoing with multiple exchanges. nothing confirmed publicly. we disclose once a deal is finalized, not before. No announcements about announcements. 10. Listing budget We do not pay listing fees. the protocol was built specifically against the extractive model that listing fees represent. if the asset merits a listing, the terms should reflect that. we have 100M PIGEON allocated for the right tier-1 partnership structured as a genuine exchange integration, not a pay-to-list transaction. 11. Product introduction and category Category: deflationary token launchpad and burn infrastructure, Solana. PigeonHouse is a token launchpad where every token launched is permanently connected to a shared burn engine. launch fees burn PIGEON on-chain in the same block. trade fees on the bonding curve burn PIGEON atomically. at graduation, LP is locked to a dead wallet forever and mint authority on the launched token is revoked. after graduation, Raydium CPMM AMM Config Index 12 generates a 1.20% creator fee on every trade, collected every 15 minutes, converted to PIGEON, and burned permanently. the burn relationship between a launched token and the PIGEON engine does not end at graduation. it runs for the life of the token.