I'm almost certain they've all been Canadian citizens for a long time!

This could be a good idea for Canada. What do you think?

It's outrageous, and this is tolerated in Canada! Is there a single Sikh leader in Canada who can condemn the images of child suicide bombers?

Flashback

Voilà ce que m'a coûté le combat pour la liberté. Je suis prêt à recommencer. youtu.be/3xagMWNdZns?si=8rh1…

La semaine dernière, le gouvernement Carney a lancé sa dernière attaque contre la liberté d'expression en ligne. Ils appellent cela stopper les contenus « nuisibles ». J'appelle cela de la censure. Le projet de loi C-34 crée une nouvelle bureaucratie : la Commission de la sécurité numérique du Canada. Son rôle sera de surveiller ce que vous dites et lisez en ligne. Sous le couvert de la « protection des enfants », ce projet de loi oblige les plateformes de médias sociaux et les entreprises d'Intelligences Artificielles à limiter l’exposition aux « discours haineux ». Un « discours haineux » est « un contenu exprimant de la détestation ou de la diffamation » à l'égard d'une personne ou d'un groupe de personnes, fondée sur des motifs de discrimination interdits. Or, les tribunaux ont toujours exigé que la « haine » soit extrême pour constituer un crime. Cette nouvelle définition n'inclut pas le terme « extrême », contrairement à la jurisprudence. Le gouvernement élargit donc la définition de la « haine ». De plus, la notion de « haine » ne sera plus tranchée par les juges. Cette décision sera prise par des bureaucrates non élus et des employés du secteur technologique apeurés et menacés d'amendes de 10 millions de dollars. Les entreprises de médias sociaux et d’Intelligences Artificielles, afin d'éviter les amendes, pencheront probablement pour la censure, en bloquant ou en filtrant davantage d'expressions. Plus choquant encore, le projet de loi censurerait les réponses d'intelligence artificielle comme ChatGPT afin d'éviter qu'ils ne donnent des réponses « nuisibles » sur des sujets sensibles. Cela aura pour conséquence que l’intelligence artificielle refusera de répondre honnêtement sur des points de vue impopulaires. Et un internet aseptisé où il sera impossible d'avoir des conversations et des débats difficiles sur des sujets politiquement incorrects, comme ce fut le cas lors de la crise de la COVID. Pour empêcher les moins de 16 ans d'accéder aux médias sociaux, le projet de loi obligerait les plateformes à vérifier l'âge des utilisateurs. Cela pourrait impliquer d'exiger de tous les adultes qu'ils présentent un permis de conduire pour créer un compte. Soyons clairs : le Parti populaire du Canada appuiera toujours la protection des enfants contre tout préjudice réel. Mais « sécurité » ne signifie pas censure. Ce n’est pas un projet de loi sur la sécurité des enfants. C’est un projet de loi de contrôle et de censure. Une société libre et démocratique protège les propos déplaisants, impopulaires ou contraires à l’opinion dominante. Sans cela, la démocratie meurt. Nous ne troquerons pas la liberté contre l’illusion de la sécurité. Nous ne laisserons pas Ottawa devenir la police de la parole en ligne.

Last week, the Carney government launched its latest attack on free speech online. They call it stopping “harmful” content. I call it censorship. Bill C-34 creates a new bureaucracy: the Digital Safety Commission of Canada. Its job will be to police what you say and read online. Under the guise of “protecting children,” this bill forces social media platforms and AI companies to mitigate exposure to "hate speech.” A “hate speech ” is a “content that expresses detestation or vilification” of an individual or group of individuals based on prohibited grounds of discrimination. But, courts have always required that "hatred" be extreme to be a crime. This new definition does not include the term "extreme," contrary to case law. The government therefore broadens the definition of "hatred.” Furthermore, the concept of "hate" will no longer be decided by judges. This decision will be made by unelected bureaucrats and scared tech employees facing $10 million fines. Social media companies and AI companies concerned about facing fines will likely err on the side of censoring more expression by blocking it or filtering it out. Most shockingly, the bill would censor the output of artificial intelligence like ChatGPT to ensure they don’t give “harmful” answers on sensitive topics. This will result in AI that refuse to give honest answers on unpopular viewpoints. And a sanitized internet where people cannot have difficult conversations and debates on subjects not politically correct, like it happened during the COVID hysteria. To keep kids under 16 off social media, the bill would force platforms to verify your age. This could involve requiring all adults to present a driver's license to create an account. Let me be clear: the People’s Party of Canada will always support protecting children from real harm. But “safety” does not mean censorship. This is not a child safety bill. It is a bill of control and censorship. A free and democratic society protects speech that is distasteful, unpopular, or contrary to the mainstream. Without that, democracy dies. We will not trade liberty for the illusion of safety. We will not let Ottawa become the online speech police.

“(…) the specifics of Carney's food strategy are chock full of harmful policies. It involves more than $3 billion of spending over 10 years. Canada's food system is about to become more expensive and less secure thanks to Mark Carney's new National Food Security Strategy, which expands government control over food production and sales.” The Carney government is borrowing and spending billions of dollars we don't have on subsidies and imposing more regulations and controls, when what we need is more free markets. The first step to ensuring food affordability is to abolish the dairy, poultry, and egg cartel. Neither the Liberals nor the fake Conservatives will do it.

Au printemps 2022, Wagner déclarait au journal Le Devoir que le convoi de la liberté marquait « le début de l’anarchie » et que certains manifestants avaient entrepris de « prendre d’autres citoyens en otage ». Des propos forts. (…) L’appel concernant l’utilisation par Ottawa de la Loi sur les mesures d’urgence est maintenant devant sa cour, et Wagner refuse de se récuser. (…) Le critère de la récusation n’a jamais reposé sur ce qu’un juge croit pouvoir annuler en privé. Il repose sur la façon dont un refus de se récuser est perçu par un observateur raisonnable et informé. « La justice ne doit pas seulement être rendue », comme l’a dit Lord Hewart il y a un siècle, « mais elle doit être manifestement et indubitablement perçue comme telle. » Difficile d’imaginer comment un juge en chef qui a qualifié le convoi d’acte d’anarchie peut aborder un appel à ce sujet avec impartialité. (…) Il y a des raisons pour lesquelles les juges sont de plus en plus perçus comme des obstacles à la volonté populaire : les Canadiens ont vu la Cour suprême passer outre les décisions du Parlement sur les questions qui leur tiennent le plus à cœur. NE ME DEMANDEZ PAS POURQUOI LES CANADIENS ONT PERDU CONFIANCE EN NOS INSTITUTIONS !

“In the spring of 2022, Wagner told Le Devoir the Freedom Convoy was “the beginning of anarchy” and said some protesters had set out to “take other citizens hostage.” Strong words. (…) the appeal over Ottawa's use of the Emergencies Act is now before his court, and Wagner won't step aside. (…) The test for recusal has never turned on what a judge privately believes he can set aside. It turns on how a failure to recuse looks to a reasonable, informed observer. “Justice should not only be done,” as Lord Hewart put it a century ago, “but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.” Hard to see how a chief justice who called the convoy an act of anarchy can be seen to approach an appeal about it with an open mind. (…) There are reasons judges are increasingly viewed as obstacles to the popular will: Canadians have watched the Supreme Court override Parliament on the questions they care about most.” DON'T ASK ME WHY CANADIANS HAVE LOST FAITH IN OUR INSTITUTIONS!

Dear Albertans, For decades, Ottawa has treated your province not as an equal partner in Confederation, but as a subordinate and an ATM. The unfair equalization formula has taken your wealth for 61 years. You’ve sent billions of dollars and have never received a single penny back. In October 2021, 62% of you voted in a referendum to stop this wealth drain. And nobody is listening to you. Certainly not the Liberals. And not the Conservatives who take your vote for granted while doing nothing for you. You’re right to be enraged. Ottawa blocks your pipelines, strangles your energy sector, kills your jobs, and then demands your money. They want your wealth but deny you the means to earn more. I share your frustration. Now you have a chance to be heard. On October 19, you will answer a critical question:  “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?” You have two options: Should Alberta REMAIN a province, or COMMENCE the legal process to hold a binding referendum on separation?  The “Remain” option changes nothing. That’s the status quo. Alberta remains a colony of Ottawa’s imperial federalism.  That means allowing the federal government to continue interfering into provincial affairs with its unconstitutional laws, regulations and spending programs on sectors such as healthcare, natural resources development, education, and others.  That means pipelines being held hostage to costly carbon capture schemes, industrial carbon taxes killing your competitiveness, no equalization reform and zero control over immigration. The “Commence the legal process” option is the only way to a strong Alberta. Voting to start the legal process for a secession referendum launches genuine negotiations for greater autonomy for Alberta. It puts a knife to the throat of Ottawa’s establishment. It gives you bargaining power. Poilievre’s fake Conservatives and Carney’s Liberals will work together and promise you autonomy, just like they promised Quebec at the last referendum.  The result was the opposite, even with a very close 49/51% vote. More centralization and more trampling of provincial jurisdictions, including another bunch of unconstitutional federal programs created by Justin Trudeau in recent years: national daycare, pharmacare, dental care.  Don’t believe them. History shows Ottawa only listens when faced with a credible democratic threat to its authority. The federalist camp will lie and say a “Commence” vote means separation, and also untold catastrophes and the end of the world as we know it. That's not the case.  It’s a vote to start negotiations that could of course lead to separation, but not necessarily. It’s also a vote for an end to federal imperialism. A vote for autonomy, for fairness, for respect. As in Quebec, that’s very likely what the large majority of voters want in Alberta, and that’s what would be by far the best outcome for everyone. And to genuine Alberta separatists who want a more radical break anyway, I say: be patient. That debate comes later, after a strong “Commence” vote and possibly failed negotiations. The People’s Party of Canada stands with all of you who are fed up with the status quo and want a radical change, whether it’s radical decentralization – as my party has been proposing for years – or outright separation.  We support the “Commence” option. We believe in a united Canada, but unity cannot be forced through coercion and constitutional overreach. True unity requires respect for our Constitution. This is your moment Albertans. The time for decisive action is now.  But, let's be clear: Ottawa doesn’t listen to polite demands. It doesn’t listen to reason. It only listens to power.  Use your power. Vote to COMMENCE this legal process. Vote for a new beginning for you and the country.

Ottawa is driving Canada toward a financial disaster. youtu.be/c8QjkK3MeNI?si=Ye1H…

Flash-back five years ago

This is what the fight for freedom cost me. I am ready to do it again. youtu.be/qMHBoxn1foM?si=UD7k…

Anti-immigrant sentiment is growing in Europe and North America. Why? Because of the mass immigration and multiculturalism policies that elites have imposed on their citizens. We need a MORATORIUM on all forms of immigration and the abolition of the policy of multiculturalism and its funding.

Restore Canada! Close the doors and deport!

Xavier Moreau retourné en France pour des raisons fallacieuses politiques par les services douaniers. Des raisons POLITIQUES! Mais on laisse entrer des terroristes d'AL-Qaeda comme la mairesse conne de Toronto veut faire! @FNLfreedomnews @StefBlaisFDDLP @MaximeBernier