Joined December 2017
263 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
18 Feb 2025

6
9
48
12,945
要不要来玩?
明天晚上20点准备开一个Space,好久没开了,社区成员建议开一开甚至定期开,我努力满足大家要求 RGB茶话会(01):关于RGB,你想要知道的都在这里 🔴自由麦性质,但限于RGB相关话题 🟢RGB协议的技术、发展、进度、动态等都可以聊,有相关问题也可以自由提问 🔵有兴趣的可以边喝茶边参与 twitter.com/i/spaces/1PKqrrq… #BTC #RGB
1
3
261
Botanix关闭-BTC生态要完了? Botanix 是当时在比特币生态最热闹的时候,非常受关注的西方二层扩展项目。它的关闭从侧面反映出,这个生态现在确实非常冷清。 当时在做比特币生态扩展时,其实有很多条路径,比如做 跨链桥,比如使用 BitVM 这种方式。这种跨链桥也包括中心化、半中心化和去中心化的方案,而目前最去中心化的方式应该是 BitVM,现在也还有很多团队在推进。我记得 Botanix 当时做的是一个联合方案,偏POS的方案。从投资阵容可以看出来,Botanix 曾是比特币生态在西方的一面旗帜,但今天它也停止运营了。 我个人觉得比特币生态一直都有希望和机会。但它到底会成长成什么样?因为比特币生态没有像 Vitalik 这样的人物,也没有一个统一的 Vision(愿景),所以它没有一个所谓更“正统”或更被认可的方向。 但从另一个角度来看,这其实是件好事,因为你会看到百花齐放、百家争鸣。关于比特币生态扩展到底该怎么做,目前有很多尝试: 1. 协议层:比如 Ordinals 或 Runes。 2. 创新技术:比如 BitVM。 3. 创新模式:比如多签的统一账户钱包。 4. 侧链模式:尝试最久的方案。 5. 语言或者脚本:因为可能会影响现有网络所以非常谨慎。(例如OP CAT;Simplicity语言) 我个人目前比较看好的还是 RGB 方向: (a) 它比较受比特币“原教旨主义”的推崇,没有给网络带来额外负担。 (b) 它拥有全新的模式,比如基于 UTXO 的结构,这会导致它与账户模型有完全不一样的玩法。 (c)极致的隐私 (d)和闪电网络的完美兼容能解决性能问题 虽然 RGB 概念不算新,但因为它确实比较难做,从提出想法到现在,才刚刚开始有一些可以使用的设施或基建。接下来随着 RLN 的上线,整个 RGB 的这条路径可能会慢慢展现在众人面前,我很期待这件事的发生。 最近也看到了甲烷还有unisat的一些动作,看来大家也都没有放弃,挺好的。 风会吹回BTC生态,在之前狂欢过的废墟之上,有些真的有价值的东西正在成长,耐心一点,给他一点时间,能赢!
It is with a heavy heart that we announce we are winding down the Botanix network. This decision is the hardest one we have made in four years, and we want to share the reasoning openly because the people who backed us, built with us, and used what we shipped deserve more than a quiet shutdown notice. First off, an immediate practical consideration for the Botanix community: please withdraw your Bitcoin and other assets before July 9th, 2026. When we started in 2022, the pitch was simple enough to say in a sentence: bring real utility to Bitcoin. What that actually meant in practice, and what we have spent nearly four years building toward, was more ambitious than that sentence made it sound. We were trying to build a Bitcoin-based blockchain that could find genuine product-market fit as a platform for Bitcoin applications, without using token incentives to drive growth, manufacture users, or simulate utility. Almost every chain that has launched in the last cycle has reached for the same playbook (issue a token without PMF, engineer the incentive surface, point at the resulting metrics), and we did not believe this route is a viable strategy in the long term. We wanted to know whether a Bitcoin chain could earn its users on the strength of what was built on top of it, the value it brings in the market with Bitcoin itself as the only meaningful economic primitive in the system. And we built it. The Spiderchain went live and stayed live, a year of mainnet operation with one hundred percent uptime and zero security incidents on a genuinely novel cryptographic architecture. We built Dynafed, a dynamic federation that turned the Spiderchain from a static multisig set into a rotating, decentralized one, the technical milestone that most people in this space said could not be built on Bitcoin without compromising trust assumptions. Twenty-five million transactions, two hundred thousand wallets, and tens of millions of dollars in assets moved across the chain, every single number of that earned organically without a token, without airdrops, without points programs, or any of the manufactured-demand machinery. Chainlink, Morpho, GMX, Dolomite, Fireblocks, Alchemy, Galaxy, OKX Wallet, all integrated. We shipped a Bitcoin neobank with BINK on iOS and Android, with self-custodial email login for Bitcoin (something that had never existed before), native Bitcoin yield, and the lowest borrowing rates against Bitcoin anywhere in the world, all of it downstream of owning the infrastructure. The point of saying this is not to argue with our own conclusion. The protocol works, the product works, and our team and ecosystem worked in concert to do exceptional work. We have run this experiment in earnest, with a working protocol, real applications, and a serious team, for over a year on mainnet and nearly four years in total. The honest answer we have arrived at, after living inside it every day, is that it did not work, at least not in this market and not on this timeline. We want to share what we think we learned, with the caveat that some of this is conviction and some of this is still suspicion, and we would rather be transparent about the difference than pretend to have clarity we do not have. The first thing I've had to sit with is timing. Bitcoin utility, making Bitcoin programmable, productive, and integrated into real financial activity, isn't where the real world users sit right now. The conversation is still on Bitcoin as a reserve asset, on its monetary and political positioning, on base-layer conservatism. Those questions are upstream of the ones a Bitcoin L2 needs people to be asking. I still believe Bitcoin gets there, but belief in the destination is not the same as being able to predict when, and nobody can. It's also possible the destination never materialises at all, and that Bitcoin's role as a reserve asset is simply where it settles. If that's true, there will never be a market for what we were building, and no amount of time or capital would change that. The second is the token question. We intended to eventually launch a token. We saw it, and still see it, as a genuinely new form of equity, something closer to an IPO than an airdrop, to be done when you reach product market fit and the moment is right. That moment never came. What became clear over the last year is that the market largely stopped rewarding even the more considered versions of that playbook. Token launches across the board have broadly underperformed, and those that did go to market with tokens haven't seen the outcomes or PMF that the model is supposed to produce. The third lesson is about where DeFi demand on Bitcoin actually lives. For most use cases that exist today, lending, yield, leveraged exposure, WBTC on a mature general-purpose L2 is genuinely sufficient. Users have voted with their behaviour, and the verdict is that the trust assumptions of a wrapped representation on Ethereum are acceptable to almost everyone who wants Bitcoin-denominated DeFi. Decentralisation matters to people in principle and in conversation; in practice, when something cheaper and easier is in front of them, they use it. The security case for a dedicated Bitcoin L2 is real, but it only matters for a narrower band of applications than our thesis required, one of the clearer lessons this market has taught us. The fourth lesson is structural. The on-chain economy is consolidating around venues that own the user relationship: Hyperliquid, Robinhood, the major CEXes, and now TradFi participants absorbing an ever-larger share of attention, flow, and revenue. Convenience and institutional credibility win, every time, as soon as they're available. As retail participation thins, that concentration only deepens. We were, and still are, believers in decentralisation, but the current direction of on-chain growth is running through distribution, and any team building base-layer infrastructure today is rowing upstream against that current. We were no exception. The fifth lesson is the most concrete. Both of the above played out directly in our economics. The users we attracted were primarily using Bitcoin as a store of value for yield, a legitimate use case, but not the high-frequency transaction volume that drives fee revenue on a network like ours. BINK was our answer to that: a Bitcoin neobank designed to bring daily usage of BTC and stablecoins on-chain, driving the transaction volume the network needed. It was the right strategic instinct, and one we never got the chance to fully test. BINK only landed on both app stores in the last few weeks, a product that by its nature could only be built once the underlying infrastructure was proven and live. When users choose the convenient option and economic gravity pulls toward distribution, what's left on a decentralised infrastructure layer is a user base that costs more to serve than it generates. Infrastructure costs are what they are, and the fee income never came close to covering them. If you would like to see how we were imagining a Bitcoin future and what we have been working on since September, feel free to download BINK and give it a spin: it’s a full-fledged self-custodial Bitcoin Neobank with email login, one click borrowing, a Lightning integration and more. App store: apps.apple.com/us/app/bink-b… Play store: play.google.com/store/apps/d… This UX is where we think Bitcoin is ultimately heading towards although it feels too early. You can use invite code 1SD31R, but remember to remove your funds by July 9th. We could keep going. We have chosen not to, however, because continuing past the point where additional time stops producing additional learning is not conviction, it is something that looks like conviction from the outside while corroding into something else on the inside. We would rather stop now, with integrity intact and resources available to take care of the people who took a chance on us, than push the experiment past the point where it still has something to teach us. Reminder: Please withdraw all your assets by July 9th. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. After this, the federation will sweep the remaining Bitcoin. Any other assets or tokens on the network from then onwards will unfortunately be unrecoverable. To our investors, who backed a thesis that was harder to defend than it should have been, to our partners who built alongside us and bet pieces of their own roadmaps on ours, to the developers who deployed on Spiderchain, to our users and the BINK community who showed up for something experimental and stayed, and most of all to the Botanix team who shipped a genuinely novel system with rigour and care and who made every hard day worth the difficulty: Thank you, more than the words available here can carry.
4
4
17
1,256
卡牌类项目学习报告 链上实物卡牌 RWA 这条线,最近明显热起来了。也很好理解,因为区块链利用其擅长的交易特性,解决了卡牌交易中欠缺的即时性、有效性和公平定价等问题,可以说是完美契合。 它的机制也比较简单:实体卡在 vault 里,链上资产负责交易、流动性、开包、赎回和金融化。 现存市场上的项目按机制可以分 3 类: 1/ 开包类:Pack-opening / Gacha / Vending 代表项目: - Courtyard io - Collector Crypt - Phygitals - RIP FUN 这一类最像把线下拆包体验搬到链上: 买数字包,随机开出实体评级卡对应的 NFT,用户可以继续持有、交易,或者烧 NFT 赎回实体。 优势很明显: - 用户体验强,拆包天然有传播性 - 平台能做 live odds、VRF、公平性证明 - 二级市场、排行榜、回购机制容易做增长 但风险也最集中: - 机制容易被质疑为博彩化 - pack EV、概率、库存透明度很关键 - 托管、保险、审计、赎回速度决定信任底座 2/ 交易类:Marketplace / 1:1 实物 NFT 代表项目: - Courtyard marketplace - Collector Crypt marketplace - Only Gems(早期案例) - 4K Protocol(泛实物资产协议) 这一类更接近标准 RWA: 一张实体卡对应一个链上凭证,卡存在 vault,NFT 负责转让和赎回权。 优势: - 降低跨境交易与物流摩擦 - 减少真假验证和重复交割成本 - 可以接抵押、借贷、组合管理等 DeFi 场景 短板: - 流动性仍集中在热门 IP 和少数高价值卡 - 链上价格需要线下市场做锚 - 法律所有权、托管破产隔离、审计频率必须看清楚 3/ 碎片化类:Fractional / Shards 代表项目: - Market Cards - Grail - Dibbs(历史案例,现已转型/非活跃) 这类的目标是解决高价卡门槛: 把 Messi、Haaland、Pokemon grail card 这类资产拆成更小份额,让更多人参与交易。 优点: - 降低入场门槛 - 提升高价卡潜在流动性 - 可以做集齐、竞拍、收益分配等玩法 但流动性是最大的挑战: - AMM最容易炒,但极容易圣诞树套人脱离卡价值本身 - 订单簿模式用户体验可能会比较差 关于这几个机制,我个人不喜欢拆包,因为运气一般的话基本回不了本,但赌博特性天然会有很大流量,交易量也确实证明了这个判断; 1:1因为高价卡天生会拒绝大部分参与者,但是不知道普卡会不会有人愿意玩和提供流动性; 碎片化有可能是比较适合大部分人去赌一把的模式,但是对流动性比较有考验。 我在Grail和Market cards都参与体验了一下,目前Speed已被套😂
6
4
9
603
自己没那么懂足球,但是又想参与球星卡的市场,所以我让Codex做了一个很有意思的球星卡世界杯赔率模型。 这么玩对吗?@MarketCardsHQ @Jhy256 @ch999degen 核心问题是: 如果某个球员所在国家队赢下 2026 世界杯,并且他本人是夺冠过程中的核心人物,那么他的球星卡价格应该会获得一轮明显的“冠军叙事溢价”。 所以我想把每张卡拆成一个类似赔率的模型来看。 这不是博彩公司盘口,也不是投资建议,而是一个球星卡收藏/交易视角下的事件驱动分析。 一张卡是否值得押注,我主要看 4 个变量: 1. 当前卡价 价格越高,说明市场可能已经提前定价,后续涨幅弹性会下降。价格越低,涨幅空间更大,但流动性和确定性也更差。 2. 国家队夺冠概率 球队越有可能夺冠,卡片触发冠军叙事的概率越高。这里我参考了 2026 世界杯前的公开预测模型和冠军赔率。 3. 球员在国家队的地位 头号球星、队长、进攻核心、决赛潜在主角,权重更高。轮换球员、新星、入选不稳的球员,权重更低。 4. 夺冠后的叙事强度 有些球员夺冠后会直接改变历史地位,比如 Mbappe、Yamal、Messi 相关卡。有些球员即使夺冠,也可能只是团队冠军,市场反应会弱一些。 我用的简化公式是: 条件涨幅 = 60% × 球员队内地位系数 × 当前价格弹性系数 机会指数 = 国家队夺冠概率 × 条件涨幅 这个“机会指数”越高,代表这张卡在世界杯夺冠叙事下的赔率越有吸引力。 模型跑下来,最强的一组基本集中在西班牙球员身上。 原因很简单: 西班牙目前是冠军概率最高的球队之一,而且队内有很多年轻、核心、具备长期收藏叙事的球员。 我算出来最靠前的是: 1. Dani Olmo 机会指数约 20.39% 他现在卡价不算特别高,但如果西班牙夺冠,而且他在淘汰赛里继续贡献进球或助攻,卡价叙事会非常直接。 2. Rodri 机会指数约 20.24% Rodri 的逻辑很强。他已经有金球奖、欧洲杯和俱乐部荣誉,如果再拿世界杯,他的历史中场地位会继续上升。相比顶级新星卡,他的价格弹性仍然不错。 3. Pedri 机会指数约 19.43% Pedri 是西班牙中场核心叙事里最容易被收藏市场理解的名字。如果西班牙夺冠,他会被重新定价成“这一代西班牙中场代表人物”。 4. Pedri / Ferran Torres 双人卡 机会指数约 18.62% 这张卡的逻辑是西班牙冠军组合叙事。Pedri 提供核心中场价值,Ferran 如果有关键进球,会进一步放大这张卡的故事性。 5. Mikel Oyarzabal 机会指数约 18.62% 这张很有意思。Oyarzabal 不是最大牌的名字,但价格相对低,而且他已经有欧洲杯决赛进球的叙事基础。如果世界杯再来关键球,卡价弹性会非常高。 6. Lamine Yamal 机会指数约 17.69% Yamal 的叙事可能是所有球员里最强的。 问题是,他的卡价已经很贵了。也就是说,市场已经提前买入了一部分“未来球王 西班牙冠军核心”的预期。 所以他不是没有机会,而是赔率没有看起来那么便宜。 7. Kylian Mbappe 机会指数约 14.54% Mbappe 是法国方向最清晰的选择。 如果法国夺冠,他作为队长和头号球星,很容易拿到最大叙事:第二座世界杯、法国时代核心、历史地位继续上升。 他的确定性很强,但卡价也已经不低。 8. Michael Olise 机会指数约 11.74% Olise 是偏赔率型的法国卡。 法国夺冠概率高,他的价格相对低。风险在于:他必须真的成为主角。如果只是轮换或者边缘贡献,卡价未必能吃到法国夺冠的最大红利。 9. Julian Alvarez 机会指数约 10.85% 阿根廷方向里,Alvarez 是我比较喜欢的赔率型卡。 如果阿根廷再次夺冠,Messi 叙事当然最大,但 Alvarez 可能会成为“后 Messi 时代冠军前锋”的代表之一。 10. Enzo Fernandez 机会指数约 9.91% Enzo 的逻辑是阿根廷中场核心。如果阿根廷完成世界杯连冠,他的历史履历会非常漂亮。 11. Maradona / Batistuta / Messi 三签卡 机会指数约 9.85% 这张卡的绝对叙事极强。 问题是当前价格已经非常高,约 50,000 美元。它更像顶级收藏品,不是赔率最高的弹性资产。 12. Thiago Almada 机会指数约 8.58% 这是典型低价赔率卡。 如果阿根廷夺冠,而且他能进入重要轮换甚至有关键表现,涨幅弹性会很大。但前提条件也最多。 总结一下: 如果只看“冠军叙事 价格弹性 国家队概率”,我最看好的不是最贵的卡,而是中间价格带里那些既有冠军概率,又有队内核心地位的球员。 第一梯队: Dani Olmo Rodri Pedri Mikel Oyarzabal Lamine Yamal Kylian Mbappe 第二梯队: Michael Olise Julian Alvarez Enzo Fernandez Raphinha Vinicius Jr Bukayo Saka Jamal Musiala 高叙事但赔率没那么便宜: Messi 三签卡 Cristiano Ronaldo Haaland Neymar Modric Salah Son 这些球员的个人故事都很强,但要么卡价已经很高,要么国家队夺冠概率太低,所以模型里的机会指数会被压下来。 我觉得球星卡最有意思的地方就在这里: 它不是单纯买球员实力,也不是单纯买国家队强弱。 它买的是一个未来故事。 世界杯就是最大的故事放大器。 如果你能在故事发生前,找到那些“概率还不错、价格还没完全反映、球员有机会成为主角”的卡,那才是真正有赔率的地方。
9
4
14
5,929
RGB还是太难收了,你们也太钻了,离心目中想要的数量还是差一些没收齐。 虽然收货成本提升了,但从另外一个角度来说,证明这个方向没问题。有很多人同样认可这个赛道这个项目。 从120sats到400sats,币本位3倍多了,想止盈的也可以考虑了。 虽然价格涨了不少,但是6M的总市值依然很有值搏率。
不知不觉, $RGB 突破了新高 我觉得这也是必然的事情,因为 #RGB 协议有太多的优点可以说、值得说,我也说了很多次了 早期阶段,大幅度的涨涨跌跌都是正常事情 1. 看好的可以保持关注或者保持持仓 2. 觉得有些fomo了的建议适当的落袋为安,浮盈不是盈 3. 不看好的如果有货可以出掉,不然持仓体验差了反而耗散自己的精力 未来的RLN测试,我在构想在社区进行一个大型的测试活动,助力RLN的大规模测试通过(为什么我这么强调大规模测试,因为对于RGB这种复杂协议,没有经历过这样水准测试的产品很难值得信任)
8
14
2,735
这个已经开始交易了,一个号涨幅11%,另一个号涨幅30%,看来抽到哪个卡还是有区别。暂时不准备出手,等世界杯发酵一下看看。另外有没有懂足球的兄弟帮忙看看哪个卡有潜力啊?到时候再去埋伏点!
塞了一点,有像我一样对这个卡牌赛道感兴趣但是不知道如何入手的,我感觉这个方式挺好。 68张足球的1/1卡分成了30000份,参与这个项目像极了买入了足球卡的ETF! 在世界杯之前买入,总感觉不会亏的样子。
1
4
281
半天多的时间,认购已经超过80%了,还是挺快的。估计Christian老板说的折价也是个原因?那就再加点。
塞了一点,有像我一样对这个卡牌赛道感兴趣但是不知道如何入手的,我感觉这个方式挺好。 68张足球的1/1卡分成了30000份,参与这个项目像极了买入了足球卡的ETF! 在世界杯之前买入,总感觉不会亏的样子。
5
232
塞了一点,有像我一样对这个卡牌赛道感兴趣但是不知道如何入手的,我感觉这个方式挺好。 68张足球的1/1卡分成了30000份,参与这个项目像极了买入了足球卡的ETF! 在世界杯之前买入,总感觉不会亏的样子。
2
4
879
这跌法还以为是312或者94来了! 开始准备子弹了!
1
143
我记得Shuyao在早期节目里自己称Mega是underdog,underdog怎么还采用这种上个世纪的积分体系?赶紧扔进垃圾堆里去! “用户数据”不重要,强使用场景正在成为Crypto的路: 用完稳定币支付再去用银行账户支付肯定会骂娘; 链上美股的交易体验和便利性直接吊打传统券商; Mega呢?
May 31
Terminal Program has concluded. We've finalized points and are getting ready to distribute rewards to the community. Wallet Delegation is now live. You can visit terminal.megaeth.com to check your eligibility. Before June 10th, you must: 1. Select a wallet to receive your rewards 2. Subscribe with your email for the latest updates & reward releases After June 10th, all profile changes and wallet selections will be locked.
1
1
290
避坑!这么做会烧毁你的RGB资产! 推荐了一个朋友进场玩RGB,然后朋友告诉我他的RGB资产消失了,虽然知道的RGB的进场门槛比较高,但是在bitlight更新完基础设施之后还是比较少发生这样的事情了。他到底做了什么骚操作,会给RGB通缩做贡献了呢? 拢共分三步,买了50个RGB,卖了50个RGB,同时买了100个RGB,然后资产余额为0了. 所有的这些操作都是在RGBMarket上发生的,事后也与项目方一起复盘了所有的操作,基本确认原因如下:因为市场是挂单的模式,所以当我朋友在挂单出售50个RGB的时候,他是可以开出invoice的,(因为RGB还是在他钱包里)所以他拿着invoice去收货去了。但当他的卖单成交,他把50个RGB发出去之后,他的绑定RGB资产的utxo就解除了;这时,他收货的订单成交,卖家发货到了一个已经解除UTXO的invoice上。至此,艺术已成。 这种情况估计不是整天倒买倒卖的应该不会碰到,但是对于一个新进入生态的人来说确实是很懵逼很奇怪的,这也是RGB生态在不断完善过程中必然会碰到的情况。rgbmarket的项目方最终补偿了这次的损失(感谢感谢,虽然我并不知道到底是市场的原因还是钱包的原因。虽然也没多少钱,但是态度很暖心),我也提醒他们应该就这样的情况做一些提示,毕竟大部分普通用户是很难理解我把代币转空了再转进来还需要再创建一次UTXO的情况。 这个事情我在跟大胖墩老师沟通的时候,他提到之前好像是社区建议在余额归零之后自动解除这个utxo的。我能理解这个建议,但是,但是!是RGB合约的utxo绑定解除了,这个utxo还是锁定的,这并没有给用户带来便利,反倒是带来了很多麻烦,所以我建议这个设置还是不要在余额归零之后自动解除绑定RGB,@Bitlight_wallet @BitlightLabs 这个建议强烈建议官方考虑!就像你sol账号最终是可以去自己解除一些绑定拿回来一些sol一样,大家是能够接受的。 RGB一直在变好的路上,也一直在通缩😂,充分体现了它的价值!
1
1
7
2,560
数字黄金梦已醒,期待RGB能重启比特币。
3
3
336
Stash开了内测,有兴趣的可以看看,入选有rgb的激励,不过人数比较少,希望有机会入选。
🧪 Join the Invitation Test — test.rgbs.fun and Stash Node Early Access is Now Open Want early access? Here's how to qualify 👇 1/4 📋 Eligibility ✅ Follow the official @rgbstashlabs X account ✅ Actively participate in discussions related to this post ✅ Share this post & engage in related threads Selected users will receive early testing access before public launch. ⏳ Campaign ends: May 29, 2026 2/4 📬 What happens after the event? We will invite 5–10 selected users into our private Telegram community. 🎁 Every user who joins the Telegram group will receive a thank-you incentive of 300 in $RGB > ⚠️ Note: This is a historical thank-you incentive, not a testnet reward. As of this campaign, we have distributed a total of 6,900 $RGB to the community. 3/4 🎟️ Testnet Reward System — Ticket-Based We've launched a complete Ticket system for testnet rewards: → Submit feedback & report issues via test.rgbs.fun → All accepted feedback is permanently recorded on Stash Network → Anti-bot mechanism to ensure fair participation for everyone No engineering shortcuts. Real users, real rewards. 4/4 💬 Thank you for your support and belief in what we're building. The future of Bitcoin assets starts here.
1
426
鸭梨Bfun retweeted
🧪 Join the Invitation Test — test.rgbs.fun and Stash Node Early Access is Now Open Want early access? Here's how to qualify 👇 1/4 📋 Eligibility ✅ Follow the official @rgbstashlabs X account ✅ Actively participate in discussions related to this post ✅ Share this post & engage in related threads Selected users will receive early testing access before public launch. ⏳ Campaign ends: May 29, 2026 2/4 📬 What happens after the event? We will invite 5–10 selected users into our private Telegram community. 🎁 Every user who joins the Telegram group will receive a thank-you incentive of 300 in $RGB > ⚠️ Note: This is a historical thank-you incentive, not a testnet reward. As of this campaign, we have distributed a total of 6,900 $RGB to the community. 3/4 🎟️ Testnet Reward System — Ticket-Based We've launched a complete Ticket system for testnet rewards: → Submit feedback & report issues via test.rgbs.fun → All accepted feedback is permanently recorded on Stash Network → Anti-bot mechanism to ensure fair participation for everyone No engineering shortcuts. Real users, real rewards. 4/4 💬 Thank you for your support and belief in what we're building. The future of Bitcoin assets starts here.

58
41
36
5,246
鸭梨Bfun retweeted
如果你不清楚 #RGB 的潜能,可以阅读一下Ajan老师在2023年写的这篇文章: btcstudy.org/2023/09/12/the-… 借用文中最后一句话: 这也解释了,为什么不理解比特币的人,将很难理解 RGB。而喜欢比特币的人,会认可 RGB 已经作出的设计。 #RGB $RGB

7
3
28
3,052
那么多人离开ETH,但是ETH的价格没有什么大的影响。 换个角度看,车轻了。 应该是健康的换手。
2
324
RGB的微信共识群挂了,新弄了两个方式 1 推特的Chat:x.com/i/chat/group_join/g205… 2 QQ群: 1102058979 欢迎大家加入,另外听说企业微信会好一些,有用的大哥给说说吗?

5
2
7
2,085
现在买入RGB像极了天使轮投资,盈亏比非常好但是风险非常高,就像在SpaceX火箭回收成功之前投资SpaceX一样。你问我为什么不在SpaceX成功了之后再投资?那时候哪还轮得到你啊!
2
3
360
Monad上的协议被盗了,没盗走很多钱,好奇去看了看Monad上的TVL-410M. 然后又去看了看更被质疑的Mega的TVL-710M(高度集中在AAVE). 高性能公链看来真的需要PMF的case。
1
375