Maybe you should watch Larry Sinclair testify in front of Congress Mark.

Is he a midget? @R0BERTDENlR0

We don't need your selfish vote. You suck.

No agreement has been reached or disclosed moron.

Useless Mars

Except the people who lost love ones asshole.

Israel and the USA are 2 different countries moron.

Tommy Robinson has just walked out of court with a victory that is already being called one of the most explosive free-speech moments in Britain. The terrorism-related case against him — linked to his refusal to hand over his phone PIN to UK police — was thrown out after the judge ruled the stop unlawful and reportedly said Robinson had been targeted because of his political views. This was not just about a phone. This was about power, politics, journalism, and whether the state can treat someone like a national security threat simply because it dislikes what they say. Robinson says he refused to unlock his phone to protect journalistic sources. The state treated it as a terrorism matter. The court, according to Robinson’s reaction, saw something far more disturbing: political targeting. Then came the detail that made the story explode worldwide: **Elon Musk reportedly helped finance Robinson’s legal defense**, stepping in where others stayed silent and turning the case into a global battle over free expression. Robinson thanked Musk publicly, asking why it had taken an American businessman to fight for justice in Britain. “First of all, thank you, Elon Musk,” Robinson said, before adding that he was targeted because of his political beliefs and that counterterrorism police were allegedly used to get access to his phone as a journalist. For supporters, this ruling is a brutal warning to the establishment: if terrorism powers can be used against controversial speech today, who will be next tomorrow? Critics will still call Robinson divisive, but this case has forced a bigger question onto the table — do rights only apply to people the government likes?

Prime example of why Americans won't give up their guns. 👇

🚨 THEY CAN'T CONTROL THE BORDERS. BUT THEY CAN CONTROL YOU. The government cannot stop the boats. Cannot stop the hotels filling up. Cannot stop the public anger. Cannot stop the protests spreading from city to city. But it can ban social media. Interesting. Because when governments begin losing control of events, they often become increasingly interested in controlling information. Millions of people are worried about immigration. Worried about crime. Worried about the future of the country. Yet instead of addressing the concerns driving that anger, the political class appears increasingly focused on regulating what people can see, hear and say online. The public is beginning to ask a simple question: Why is controlling access to information suddenly more urgent than controlling Britain's borders? That question is not going away. In fact, it is getting louder by the day.

What about Muslim 10 yr. Old women who are child bearing? I guess they are exempt? Right @Keir_Starmer

Rivers never used Drugs. Faaa Cue

Fuck you Portnoy! Where in TF were you when the left and democrats were calling Melania a whore? GOFUCKYOURSELF you little spinless fucking pussy ... and I'll tell that to your face!

What does Trump have to do with this. Stfu. You have no idea how Trump feels or how he responded.

Yes

A 100%

For👍

Total lie

Then the British set it on fire. We built it again. What is your point dumb ass?

Happy birthday Dad ! 🇺🇸 Love you !