Yes, the more you become aware the more you see, but only if you actually step back and contemplate and really look beyond your own bias, but many are still in the same Circles and Cycles , speaking about the same things. “Same Shit different Toilet” 🤣🤣🤣

⭐️ Stargazing ⭐️ Hawaiʻi has some of the most breathtaking views of the universe. On a clear night, far from the city lights, the stars remind us just how vast existence truly is. Unfortunately, places like Oʻahu continue to see more light pollution each year, making those views harder to find. What fascinates me is that throughout history, people would sit beneath the stars and contemplate their place in the world. They looked outward to better understand what was within. Today, many spend countless hours staring at screens, yet rarely pause to look up. “The man who looks at the stars without reflecting on himself sees only lights in the sky. The one who reflects sees a mirror of infinity.” Sometimes the greatest perspective isn’t found online, but in stepping outside, feeling the night air, and remembering that we’re part of something far bigger than ourselves.

With all the kids away from the hale, we had a rare opportunity to spend some quality time together. I went diving, caught a few fish, and made fresh fish tacos right there on the beach for the wife and me as we watched the sunset. Moments like these are a good reminder of how important it is to spend time with one another, get outdoors, and truly live beyond our digital spaces. It’s easy to get caught up in screens, notifications, and the constant noise, but some of life’s best moments are found in the simple things, fresh air, good food, meaningful conversation, and being present with the people who matter most.

Been getting ready for the next trip, went back to my old gym where i started to really put in the work In them days when fighting was a really big thing in my life. Remembering all those blood sweat and tears, all those breakdowns, life’s struggles, I threw it all at the bag, mitts and opponents, Now not so much, but still beating that drum and helping the younger ones along the way. Man this was highschool😂🤣😂 🔥The good ol’days🔥

Golfing and Poke🔥🔥. Honestly I never thought I would like golfing. But it’s fun.🤷🏾‍♂️massive Poke Bowl🤤🤤🤤🤤the spicy ahi sauce is fire🤤🤤

The delusional keep telling themselves that more tokens automatically means more value. Thank you for proving my point yet again. You keep talking about your token count, while I’m talking about portfolio value. Saying your TX holdings tripled since April doesn’t tell us whether your investment has tripled. It only tells us you have more TX. Those are not the same thing. If I own 1,000 of something and it becomes 3,000 of something, but the value of that something continues to decline, my wealth has not necessarily increased in proportion to my token count. That’s the part you keep glossing over. You also keep using your personal experience as if it applies to everyone. Many people entered SOLO, COREUM, and now TX at very different prices. Many averaged down. Many added capital over time. Their break-even points are not the same as yours. Which you also have been holding on to those losing positions till the merger than those losses compounded into TX😂 And let’s be factual. PSE rewards are not free value. They are additional TX. The value of those rewards is still dependent on market demand and price. If more tokens alone created wealth, every inflationary token would make everyone rich. You say it’s pure math, but you’re only applying half the equation, which is half ass math😂. The other half is market value. The losses are real. The drawdowns are real. The additional token count is real. Future prices, future demand, future participation rates, and future staking outcomes are projections. That’s been my point from the beginning. You’re presenting a best-case scenario as if it’s a certainty, while I’m looking at the actual results people have experienced from SOLO to COREUM and now TX. The market doesn’t care how many tokens someone has. What ultimately matters is portfolio value, realized gains, and whether the investment actually recovered the losses that came before it.

💯🔥Facts🔥💯 What we give our attention to ultimately rewires our connections, making that thing even more prominent in our lives, whether it’s good or bad. What we do every day shapes our perception of tomorrow, and through consistency and continuation, those patterns become even stronger. The subtle manipulation we put ourselves through is happening all the time. It can work for us or against us, and whether it’s beneficial or harmful depends entirely on the individual and what they choose to reinforce. If we continually reinforce nonsense, make-believe, and confirmation bias, those pathways become stronger and harder to recognize for what they are. Over time, we stop testing our assumptions and start defending them. But when we become more aware of these tendencies, question our own beliefs, and remain grounded in reality, we create space for growth, learning, and a clearer understanding of the world around us.

Facts and The funny part is this doesn’t just apply to Bitcoin. I’ve watched the same thing play out in the XRP community to SOLO, Coreum, and TX, to many others in these crypto streets. People talk about doing research, but most of what they call research is repeating whatever influencer, Spaces host, or community figure they already agree with. The second reality starts exposing flaws in the narrative, the story changes, the targets move, and somehow the people who were wrong yesterday become the experts again today. Many don’t study fundamentals, adoption, utility, liquidity, token economics, or even their own performance. They study confirmation bias. That’s why some sit through massive drawdowns, hold losing positions for years, ignore opportunity cost, and still convince themselves they’re winning because someone posted a bullish chart or a new narrative😂😂prime examples in recent interactions on my feed😂😂

Some of these people never learn 🤷🏾‍♂️

And this is exactly where the conversation shifts from math into assumptions. I ain’t disputing that if TX reaches $0.11, a staked position would be worth substantially more. The question is whether a 2.618 Fibonacci extension is evidence that the market will value TX at $0.11, or simply a price target drawn from a chart. A projected outcome is only as reliable as the assumptions behind it. In this case, the projection requires continued staking participation, successful compounding, sufficient demand to absorb ongoing emissions, and a market willing to support a valuation that is dramatically higher than today. What concerns me is that the downside is treated as reality while the upside is treated as certainty. The 91% drawdown is not theoretical. It happened. The losses are measurable. The $0.11 target, however, is a projection. Just as the market was expected by many to move in other directions over previous cycles, it can also fail to reach projected extension targets. The statement that a $1,000 investment can become $10,000 if TX reaches $0.11 is mathematically true. But it’s no different than saying any asset can produce extraordinary returns if it reaches a specific price target. The critical question is not whether the multiplication works. The critical question is whether the assumptions required to reach that target are realistic. This is why I focus on actual outcomes rather than hypothetical ones. Many participants have already lived through multiple cycles where recovery was always presented as being just around the corner like you and the many cycles with the same team . The market doesn’t reward projections, it rewards what ultimately materializes. More tokens, staking rewards, Fibonacci extensions, and compounding models can all look impressive on paper. In the end, portfolio recovery still depends on one thing: sustained demand that is willing to pay increasingly higher prices for the asset. Without that, every projection remains exactly that, a projection. Only to confirm ones bias.

Many have been at a loss from this same team for multiple cycles, including this one with TX. Using a simple $1,000 example, if someone held a portfolio that was split evenly between SOLO and COREUM at the pre-merger snapshot, they would have received roughly 16,275 TX after the conversion. At today’s price of around $0.0055 per TX, that position would be worth approximately $89.50. That represents a loss of about 91% from the original $1,000 investment, which aligns with what many participants have experienced. This is where understanding recovery math becomes important. A 91% drawdown is not recovered by a 91% gain. To get back to the original $1,000 value without considering additional emissions or rewards, TX would need to rise to roughly $0.0615 per token, an increase of more than 11 times from current levels. Some often point to PSE as a way to accelerate recovery. While PSE can increase an individual’s token count through staking and compounding, it does not eliminate the need for significant price appreciation. The emissions are distributed across the network over seven years and are shared among participants, meaning everyone is competing for a portion of the same allocation. Even under optimistic early-stage scenarios where staking rewards substantially increase a holder’s TX balance, the investment would still require meaningful price appreciation to fully recover losses. A larger token balance helps, but the primary driver of recovery remains the market value of the token itself. This is why it is important to separate token accumulation from actual portfolio recovery. Receiving more tokens can feel encouraging, but unless the market places a higher value on those tokens, the loss remains largely unchanged. The math is straightforward. after a 91% decline, recovery requires both substantial appreciation and sustained demand. Emissions alone do not change that reality. And this is just an example some have been in more of a loss with even adding more money trying to recouped better positions.

Don’t forget, if you’ve been holding a position through major drawdowns, the climb back gets much steeper than most people realize. A 60% loss requires a 150% gain just to break even. A 70% loss requires a 233% gain. An 80% loss requires a 400% gain. A 90% loss requires a 900% gain. The deeper the drawdown, the harder it becomes to recover. It’s also why I’m critical of confirmation-bias-driven TA. When analysis is built around defending a preexisting belief, the perspective often changes more frequently than the market itself. Every move gets reframed to fit the same conclusion rather than adapting to what price is actually showing. Before celebrating every rally, remember that many market commentators have held positions through multiple cycles. Looking only at recent gains while ignoring the size of previous drawdowns can create a distorted picture of performance. Reality is measured from where you started and what it takes to recover, not by constantly shifting the narrative to match the latest price action

Adventuring somewhere in the middle of the Pacific.🔥🔥🔥

The reason I’m so adamant about biased TA is because it becomes a tool of manipulation rather than a reflection of reality. Just like this @BRW_Solo and his crew of people that’s been engaging together since the Solo days. When analysis is grounded in reality, you can prepare for multiple outcomes well in advance. That’s what I’ve been showing here from the end of April through today, these levels were being discussed and anticipated. There is no need to constantly produce a new take every time price moves. If your analysis is built on a solid framework, the possibilities are already mapped out ahead of time. Constantly shifting narratives to fit the latest move isn’t analysis, it’s just performance. Reality doesn’t need to be reinvented every day. It only needs to be understood.

Just sitting at the park waiting for the sun to go down🎶🎼🎵🎵

As I stated at the beginning of this year, and many times since, many people didn’t even think these levels were possible again. When your analysis is heavily influenced by bias, it stops being analysis and starts becoming confirmation-seeking. You’re no longer evaluating reality as it is, you’re filtering everything through a preexisting belief. Over time, that impacts decision-making. Instead of adapting to what the market is showing you, you end up defending a narrative. Reality has a way of humbling that approach, which is why remaining objective is one of the most valuable skills anyone can develop.

🤣Than and Now🤣 4/19/26 he tried to talk to me about natural and unnatural patterns😂🤣😂🤣 obviously he wasn’t prepared and doesn’t comprehend the topic because since than. We fell, which he wasn’t even looking towards these levels till recently🤷🏾‍♂️many who are holding since their first initial drop of this token is at a loss, and also what’s not included is the losses many took from solo and Coreum ecosystems that is getting compounded into TX🤦🏾‍♂️, really think about that and the deep sentiment ties that it has with its participants. Calling that early launch down fall natural🤣😂🤣

I love my life and the many adventures I’m able to take my Ohana on. At some point, like now in the present, many people need to step away from these crypto spaces and reconnect with who they truly are beyond the charts, narratives, and endless noise. Not everyone moves the same. Some move in intellectually dishonest ways, chasing attention, engagement, or the next story. Others move in reality, grounded in experience, accountability, and what they actually do with their lives outside of these spaces. Focus on the ones who share more than what crypto/blockchain has to offer. The ones building families, creating memories, helping their communities(not manipulating them through just positivity too), learning new skills, and experiencing the world around them. Markets will come and go, narratives will change, but the things that truly matter have always existed beyond the screen. Never forget to live the life you’re working so hard to build.

More on decentralization process in renaming🤔because RippleD just sounds like it’s Ripples, 😂cough cough it is RPCA😂