Pro Tip: do not trust AI to handle your SEO

I can always understand a clueless founder/CEO getting attracted to AI slop and ruining their website's SEO with it. What I'm shocked by is the amount of one's that understand SEO and still choose to automate with slop

Claude GSC SEO Hack: 1. Go to Google Search Console 2. Pick 1 page thats doing well in the last 90 days 3. Filter and download all the queries data for that page 4. Upload this CSV to Claude with the following prompt: "I wrote this article, its getting some traffic - [LINK] im attaching gsc data for this page.. Suggest new content sections to add to the page or new pages that can be created based on the queries data in gsc" Claude will analyze your page your queries will find content gaps in the page to improve its quality will find ideas for new pages to create based on the adjacent queries you're getting impressions for Apply the changes Claude suggest.. Repeat for 1 article every day.. See your SEO shoot up 🚀 Pro tip: Use claude code to actually create these pages - no manual grunt work super fast execution..

Google got better at connecting entities and building trust through clusters. If OP is correct, sounds more like a cannabilization problem than a quality one; Should be default not allowed to create new posts on topics that already exist indexed rank.

Sadly had to part ways with @outrank_so - A simple case of 'it worked until it didn't' Major Google changes in December really hit this site hard in January. My understanding is it was simply too much volume over quality. i.e a blog called creative-brief was doing amazing but Outrank did successive blogs (because it ran out of ideas) like creative-brief-2 and Google just said nono, enough of that. Good for new sites I think, for maybe a maximum of 3-6 months, but after that it just churns out the same content over and over. Some feedback for the creators, It would have been better and more proactive if the core Google update was addressed and what Outrank were doing about it.