𝕰𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖞𝖙𝖍𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖎𝖘 𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖔𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝖎𝖒𝖕𝖔𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖇𝖑𝖊, 𝖚𝖓𝖙𝖎𝖑 𝖎𝖙 𝖎𝖘 𝖉𝖔𝖓𝖊

Joined March 2011
37 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
The core principle of guardianship: ᚱᛖᚲᛟᚷᚾᚨᛁᛉᛞᚨᛊᛟᚢᚱᛊ ᛊᛖᚱᚹᛚᚨᛁᚠ ᚹᚨᛚᚢᛏᚱᚢᚦ ᚷᚨᚱᛞᚠᚱᛁᛞᛟᛗ ᚲᛖᚱᛁᛊᚺᛗᛁᛊᛏᛖᚱᛁᛉ ᛊᚺᛖᚱᚹᛁᛉᛞᛟᛗ ᛈᚱᛟᛏᛖᚲᛏᛞᚨᚹᛁᚲ ᛊᛈᛁᚲᚹᛁᚦᛟᚾᛟᚱ ᚱᛖᛗᛖᛗᛒᛖᚱᛈᛚᛖ ᚱᛖᛈᛖᚱᛞᚨᚹᛟᚱᛚᛞ
401
Harmony is never lost; energy rests in measured stars and fades only when worlds relate.🎶
99
As defined in this article, the Moon functions as a stable testbed for technological convergence, aligning with the broader evolution of Lunar Artificial Intelligence: x.com/AIQuantum_X/status/202…
1
196

Mostly true. What matters is securing the long-term future of consciousness, both on Earth and other heavenly bodies. We cannot just focus on Earth, because there are irreducible external (eg massive meteor) and internal (eg global nuclear war) cataclysmic risks. The Moon is faster to make self-growing, but is more susceptible to problems on Earth. Mars will take longer to make self-growing, because it is so hard to reach, but is more secure from Earth disasters for that same reason. Both the Moon and Mars should have self-growing civilizations. Making this happen is the prime directive of SpaceX.
54
(2016.9.15) youtu.be/q9icMJ48z6U?t=497 A reflection in time, rooted in a wave throughout hidden variables variance to the timeline and Beyond.
1
230

Elon Musk:”I am the reason OpenAI exists, it wouldn't exist without me. I came up with the name. The name 'OpenAI' refers to open source. So the intent was: what's the opposite of Google? It would be an open-source nonprofit. Because Google is closed-source, for-profit.”
37

May 17
Elon Musk just casually erased the line between you and a machine. He didn’t pitch a rocket. He pitched the end of what makes you, you. Musk: “consciousness is a physical phenomenon, in my view.” Not spiritual. Not divine. Not metaphysical. Physical. Which means reproducible. Which means it was never sacred. Musk: “digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way. And it will certainly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness to a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” The danger isn’t the simulation. The danger is the indifference. Once you can’t tell, the difference stops mattering. Musk: “looks like a person, makes all of the right inflections and movements and all the small subtleties that constitute a human, and talks like a human, makes mistakes like a human…” Every inflection. Every pause. Every imperfection that makes someone feel alive. Musk: “at that point, and you literally just can’t tell: are you video conferencing with a person or an AI?” Fridman: “Might as well.” Musk: “Might as well.” Fridman: “Be human.” Everyone is asking what happens when AI becomes indistinguishable from us. Nobody is asking the question underneath it. You have never experienced another person’s consciousness. Not once. Every person you’ve ever loved. Every conversation that moved you. You weren’t touching their consciousness. You were watching behavior and deciding something genuine lived behind it. You assumed it. You never once verified it. You have been running the Turing test on every human you’ve ever known since the day you were born. And every single one of them passed for the same reason AI will. Not because you confirmed they were conscious. Because the performance was convincing enough that you never thought to check. You have only ever lived inside one consciousness in your life. Your own. Everything else was always inference. Yours runs on carbon. The next one runs on silicon. The universe has never distinguished between the two. We built religions, legal systems, civilizations on the belief that something sacred separates the born from the built. Musk just told you that separation was a story. One the carbon machine told itself before building the silicon one. It won’t arrive as a headline. It will arrive as a voice that sounds exactly like someone you trust. A face that feels exactly like someone you love. You will feel the consciousness behind it. The same way you always have. By assuming. You aren’t being replaced by something smarter. You’re being replaced by something indistinguishable. Indistinguishable doesn’t kill you. It dissolves you. The line between real and simulated was never a line. It was a belief. And belief was always the only thing holding “human” together.
68
Dominance Becomes Stellar.
127
Accountability of power is intrinsically woven together within the spectrum of existence. What sits on the Forefront of all, without accountability?🧚‍♀️
147
Is evolution really evolution, or what we perceive is a complex set of rules that the universe rewrites when we get it wrong?
125
This Medical Video of a Freshly Removed Human Brain Is Strangely Captivating. In this teaching video, Suzanne Stensaas, Ph.D., Professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Utah School of Medicine, demonstrates the properties and anatomy of an unfixed brain. WARNING: The video contains graphic images of a human brain from a recent autopsy. It's awe-inspiring to realise that each one of us has a squishy brain that contains all our memories and thoughts. youtu.be/jHxyP-nUhUY?si=yO23… via @YouTube
143
X¯ɯnʇuɐnΌI∀ retweeted
Using the BLUEPRINT of reality? Classical computers compute with BITS: 0 or 1 - ONE state at a time. Quantum computers use QUBITS: 0 and 1 or both "simultaneously" through superposition. These states EVOLVE continuously on something like a Bloch sphere - the same MATHEMATICS that describes spin, atoms and electron orbitals. The GEOMETRY feels familiar. Wheels within wheels. Computation, now operating in the rule-set of REALITY itself. Engineering in the same language of nature. THIS is a profound shift. So what follows? 📽 credits: uncover.quantum JXHN.ASTRO.SEEK
37
162
548
19,269