I'm going to love when the VFX breakdowns drop later in the year for the Oscars! Yes they flew the planes, yes some of it was practical but let's not forget the 400 (and counting), VFX artists, on IMDB. A lot of those BGs, mountains & planes are full CG! ign.com/articles/how-top-gun…
"As long as I’ve been involved, we’ve never had Darth Maul in any of it. Dave [Filoni] did a beautiful job of telling that story already."
— Deborah Chow on reports of Maul originally appearing in OBI-WAN KENOBI
(@totalfilm)
You can argue that it isn’t “good” cinematography if you want. But it is classified as cinematography. You can’t just decide that word means what you want it to mean
Yes, because they don’t have actual cameras the act of producing an animated film is different from producing a live action movie with a camera
Some 3D animated movies might have “virtual cameras” but fundamentally cinematography is different for animation than for live action
Well it's not exactly cinematography is it. They didn't build a set, or shoot in location, light it in the correct colours and requirements, with all the correct angle and depth etc. It's just a green screen.