If markets stabilize, oil falls, and a larger regional conflict is avoided, will history view the cost as justified?
Or will people look back and ask why negotiations weren't pursued more aggressively before lives and billions were lost?
Which side do you lean toward?
The U.S. and Iran have a deal to work on a deal. During the next 60 days, there'll be a ceasefire and the Strait of Hormuz will be open. In other words, the same situation we had before the war, only lives have been lost, oil is far more expensive, and about $100B has been spent.