"Bangers" essentially live in the tails of the distribution.
Modern post-training is designed to chop those tails off to prevent high-perplexity "weirdness." We optimized for Safety > Vibes, so now we have models that are perfectly polite and statistically incapable of being interesting.
It happened again! I brainstormed a new name for a library, and gpt-5.2 and Opus 4.5 were both kinda mid. They had "logical" names but none fitting quite my taste, being too cookie cutter.
Each one had one OK suggestion among many. Surprisingly, both models had the same name idea as their favourite one, independently.
Then I asked GPT 4.5. And damn, it spit out banger after banger name ideas, to the point where now I can't decide between multiple great names.
This model has a special place in my heart. Sorry for somewhat vague-posting again :)