BREAKING: United States inflation falls to 4%, lowest since March 2021

For what it’s worth, under the Constitution, no member of Congress can be prosecuted for reading aloud on the floor any of the documents Trump allegedly has copies of.

Lots of confusion about what’s going to happen on the House floor. There may or may not be a vote. No deal btwn @SpeakerMcCarthy & conservatives yet

Wow. Kevin McCarthy defends Trump hoarding stolen national security documents in his Mar-a-Lago bathroom: “A bathroom door locks!” (h/t @AccountableGOP)

GOP Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska called the obstruction allegations against Trump “inexcusable.” “As a retired brigadier general who worked with classified materials my entire career, I am shocked at the callousness of how these documents were handled,” cnn.com/2023/06/09/politics/…

The Northern Atlantic Ocean is heating up so rapidly that it is literally, nearly off the charts. Pay heed. This is well beyond record-breaking.

This exchange between an audience member and Charlie Kirk really exemplifies the entire weekend. She tells him she's a student who dreams of being a surgeon and isn't interested in marriage. Kirk: "You’re going to have to choose which one matters more.”

Love. This. Chart. #13millionjobs

That’s not how the Obama judge ruled in 2012, when Clinton got caught with 8 years of highly classified audio recordings in his sock drawer. Regardless, the Presidential Records Act allows a former president to have his presidential records anytime he wants. It doesn’t matter whether they are classified, agency records or otherwise. Congress gives former presidents the Office of the Former President, with secure office space, staff with clearances, and Secret Service protection. There’s not even a criminal component to the Presidential Records Act. This is a political hit on Trump. What are your thoughts on Biden’s and Hillary’s stolen classified records? Haven’t seen them.

Bill Clinton had national security information in his sock drawer. Clinton never formally declassified it. When sued to return it to Archives, a federal court dismissed the case. Why? Because by law the President's mere act of removing the records made them his personal records.

The facts don’t fit the Establishment’s narrative, and neither does the law. Jack Smith’s prosecution of President Trump is likely unlawful under the Presidential Records Act. Directly from the 2012 federal court decision on the Clinton Sock Drawer case relating to classified documents: “The decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President’s term and in his sole discretion.” “The [Act] does not confer any mandatory or even discretional authority on the archivist… Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President.” This is hard judicial precedent, these are the hard facts.