Fable 5 just oneshot the first open-source MMORPG 🤯 Play it on worldofclaudecraft.com Contribute via github: github.com/levy-street/world…

Lord @RichardHeartWin, Here’s an open, no-bs proposal we truly believe could benefit Pulsechain. No flattery, no empty praise. Straight to the point. Create a Pulsechain Foundation (just a suggestion, and we already own the domain), and lead it yourself. A foundation that rewards key protocols and incentivizes every product that brings real value to the chain. You know better than anyone, countless good devs are burned out and tired of being milked by VCs and leaders. They just want a place where building something actually good means getting recognized, by you. Here’s the play 👇 Create a form, public or private. Let protocols apply with their contract addresses. Measure their on-chain impact: gas usage, PLS/PLSX burn contribution, sybil-filtered metrics, and reward the ones that truly push the chain forward. Call it Builder Mining Rewards. More successful products = more transactions. More transactions = more PLS burned. Simple math, right? It’ll boost innovation, bring in new devs, attract fresh communities, and multiply Pulsechain’s utility. And while we’re talking rewards, imagine how much PLS gets burned in the process, it’s a win on every level. Let’s be honest. If you do this, the biggest beneficiaries would likely be PulseX and Piteas. So before anyone screams self-interest, here’s our promise: whatever we earn, we’ll happily share with our users. No greed here, just growth. Because when every protocol supports this model, the whole ecosystem wins fairly. You’ve seen all those grants programs from other chains and leaders... Millions spent, zero real value. VC puppets everywhere. Huge user bases, armies of devs and yet nothing that lasts. It’s easy to lose people, hard to win them back. But when a leader extends a hand, everyone listens. Your move, @RichardHeartWin. Will the Pulsechain Foundation rise under your command with Builder Mining Rewards?

It's vital that you go to ProveX.info and inspect the leaderboard. A random check discovered an XRP address that was credited more than it should have been. And if a random check finds an error, there's likely more errors. If you don't verify that every single sac is legit and credited right, then fairness is less likely to exist upon the tokens launch. I think there's only 7500 to check, and checking is more important towards at the top of the leaderboard than the bottom, value wise. Probably the place where the most errors might be found are in the non EVM things. Or you could also not inspect, but fairness is cool and worth working for. If you don't want to post what you find here, there's a 1:1 simplex chat link on app.provex.com if you click the question mark.