A research program exploring whether the constants of nature are counts: topological invariants of a compact geometry. Founding framework: GIFT.

Joined October 2025
15 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
A naming update: the research program formerly known as GIFT is now Arithmon. Same mathematics, same frozen predictions, same timeline: a durable name for a durable question: are the constants of nature counts? find out more 👇 arithmon.substack.com/p/the-…

8
Arithmon retweeted
John v. Neumann on 'the usefulness of Mathematics' A large part of mathematics which becomes useful developed with absolutely no desire to be useful, and in a situation where nobody could possibly know in what area it would become useful; and there were no general indications that it ever would be so. By and large it is uniformly true in mathematics that there is a time lapse between a mathematical discovery and the moment when it is useful; and that this lapse of time can be anything from 30 to 100 years, in some cases even more; and that the whole system seems to function without any direction, without any reference to usefulness, and without any desire to do things which are useful. -- as mentioned in "The Role of Mathematics in the Sciences and in Society" (1954)
17
109
471
31,692
You're walking north out of Whiterun. A ruined fort on the horizon, held by bandits. You've been there before. Ask yourself a simple question: right now, while you walk, what are the bandits doing? Are they cooking? Sharpening axes? Tending the fire? Answer: nothing. They don't exist. No line of code is running for them. They're waiting for an observer. Episode 5 is up. It's about that strange thing every open-world gamer has lived without ever putting words on it: a universe that only runs where you place your gaze. And the question John Wheeler spent his late career on: maybe that's a little bit true of the real universe too. giftheory.substack.com/p/epi…

13
Arithmon retweeted
The book of nature is written in the language of mathematics. – Galileo Galilei
19
84
460
14,193
The strong coupling α_s and electroweak couplings emerge from the same G₂ structure constants. Unified origin. #GIFT #StandardModel #Geometry DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18837071
10
Run a wet finger around a wine glass and it sings. Nobody chose that note. It comes straight from the shape of the glass. What if the 26 numbers that run the entire universe work exactly the same way? New post: giftheory.substack.com/p/the…

5
Exhaustive search over 3,070,396 topological configurations: GIFT's K₇ (b₂=21, b₃=77) is the unique optimum. Not a coincidence. #GIFT #Physics #Geometry giftheory.substack.com

14
Episode 4 is live. Every Minecraft sphere is a lie that gets better with resolution but never becomes the truth. So is every numerical simulation of physics. And maybe, says quantum gravity, so are you. giftheory.substack.com/p/epi…

149
Zero free parameters means zero fine-tuning. If GIFT is right, the universe couldn't have been otherwise. #StandardModel #Geometry #G2Holonomy giftheory.substack.com

6
Arithmon retweeted
Philosophy is written in that great book which ever lies before our eyes — I mean the universe — but we cannot understand it if we do not first learn the language and grasp the symbols, in which it is written. This book is written in the mathematical language, and the symbols are triangles, circles, and other geometrical figures, without whose help it is impossible to comprehend a single word of it; without which one wanders in vain through a dark labyrinth. -- Galileo Galilei (translated quote) as mentioned in Il Saggiatore (1623) 📷 Galileo's portrait by After Justus Suttermans
23
72
316
12,647
One year of unorthodox research. New post. 6 free parameters → 0. 38 axioms → 4. 95 predictions, more than half formally verified. One falsifiable bet: δ_CP = 197° ± 5°, DUNE will tell us between 2028 and 2040. Neither believe nor reject. Just keep going. open.substack.com/pub/gifthe…

21
so(7) = g₂ ⊕ g₂⊥ — the Ambrose-Singer decomposition: 21 = 14 7. Formally verified in Lean 4. #Lean4 #GIFT #StandardModel DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18837071
1
41
Here's the one tricky thing about quantum entanglement: it doesn't let you send a message faster than light. It produces correlations, not a cosmic walkie-talkie. That distinction matters, and it's hard to feel without an example. Mario Kart turns out to be a surprisingly good one. The blue shell finds you because you're in first, regardless of where you are on the track. It targets a relational property, not a position. That doorway, "a property that's nowhere can still hit somewhere", is exactly what you need to understand entanglement properly. Episode 3 is up. open.substack.com/pub/gifthe…

1
14
Three words I tried, none of them fits: conductor, human API, crystallizer. What do you call someone who works with LLMs daily, signs the papers, pays the bills, and isn't fooled enough of the time? New post asking the question honestly. Comments open for better words. giftheory.substack.com/p/no-…

10
Episode 2 of the series. Rotate the I-piece, then slide it: four lines clear. Slide it, then rotate it: it jams against the wall. Same piece. Same actions. Different order. Different result. You just touched the operational core of quantum mechanics 👇 giftheory.substack.com/p/epi… #Tetris #physics #scicomm #quantum #gamingbet66
1
10