I’ve devised a simple test for flat earth believers to gauge their foundational knowledge. Do both polygons below — which are on a planar (flat) surface — have the same perimeter? Most can’t answer or respond with “but what about coordinate systems?!” 😂

“Projections of the graticule” — Flat earth believer, 2025

I don’t live near any mountain but I can help you out with additional funding I’ll amend my $1K Aussie flat earth challenge to run until the end of 2025 and make the aether cosmology crew eligible Good luck. You’ll need it 😂 x.com/australispiper/status/…

Flat Earthers: Can humanity reliably measure distances across the surface of the earth? 🤔

Santa knows …

Let's stop talking about the gleason map, which is a projection of the globe. Stop thinking about the globe. This is flatland. Starting fresh. If the table/Earth is flat then making an accurate map of the world would not require any distortions, right?

Flat Earthers love long-distance photos and shouting “We see too far!” and wonder why more of the peaks aren’t hidden (ignoring the hidden bases 🙄). This photo is different, and it destroys flat earth. This photo isn’t about “seeing too far.” It shows something Flat Earth cannot explain: Objects that are physically higher than the observer appear LOWER than the observer’s horizontal line of sight. That sentence alone is fatal to Flat Earth. In this image: • Observer: 221 m (Traprain Law) • Targets: Ben Lomond (974 m), Beinn Narnain (926 m), Beinn Ime (1011 m) • Distance: 125–137 km All of these mountains are hundreds of meters taller than the observer - yet every one appears below the observer’s horizontal reference line. On a flat plane: • A horizontal line stays parallel to the ground • Any object taller than the observer must intersect that line above it, not below • Distance does not change vertical ordering There is no optical mechanism that can push only distant tall objects downward while leaving nearer terrain aligned. This can only happen if the surface curves downward between observer and target, hiding lower portions first. Curvature explains it trivially. Flat Earth has no mechanism for this - ever. Earth is a globe.

Every conspiracy discussion:

Challenge for all flat earthers: Try explaining a distinct horizon over water without the aid of earth’s curvature

To believe in lay earth means you have to be a lazy arse

“There is only one angular graticule” The language of flerf

Gotta lie to flerf

Finnair's surprise announcement Helsinki-Melbourne flights will make them only the 3rd European airline flying here Before one-stop flights & connecting hubs they were frequent visitors. Let's look back at the smorgasbord of low frequency, multistop flights to Melbourne🧵⬇️

Shane, the flat earther, still doesn’t know what a graticule is. Even though it’s his favourite word

It’s extraordinary that flat earthers don’t look at half the material they posts This graphic would have given Shane multiple clues the earth is spherical: including the marking of the two celestial poles

Aussie flat earth earth believers: You only have one week left to score a grand!

Aluminium in sweat! Can’t be down to aluminium being the major active ingredient in underarm antiperspirant. Must be done to chemtrails! Frankly the most surprising thing here is that a chemtrailer actually uses deodorant.

No airline flies between Abu Dhabi and Auckland via Tokyo. Now or historically Gotta lie to flerf

Flat earther promoting Nazi propaganda wonders why his account was nuked, falsely accuses me of being responsible for his downfall and stupidly posts evidence of him working around a suspension